Re: Re[2]: Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service?
Hi, Just want to know. If we don't have post-url/get-url. Then how we parse the MO? Is it faster to check it directly to MySQL or just send it to an URL? Currently I combine the method. All MO are parsed via *-url. And the result stored to the MySQl and let the SQLBox pick it. Any other idea? What about the membox which is currently developed by Alejandro.G? Regards, Willy On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 19:25 +0300, seik wrote: exactly -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2008 ?. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Hi Seik, If I set the default one like this, I don't need the other service you suggested, right? I think setting a default service with an empty text would be sufficient. I didn't know about the omit empty = true setting, I guess that should do the trick right? So now I have this: # Default sms service. group = sms-service keyword = plaseireallydonotwatntheapachetohandlethisMTmessageTrankYou # get-url = http:// text = omit-empty = true catch-all = true max-messages = 0 That should work, right? Thanks for your help! I really appreciate it. Kind regards, Roland. seik wrote: some additional info: and set the default one with empty response text, and set omit empty = true .. i believe you got the idea -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2008 ?. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Nobody with any ideas? Rolandow wrote: Hi Guys, I am using kannel with the sqlbox, and I am directly processing my messages from the mysql database. So I thought I'd leave the default sms-service with an empty get-url. Unfortunately this gives me an error: 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [1] INFO: Starting to service Yesenia from 4671020481 to 10551 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [6] ERROR: URL doesn't start with `http://' nor `https://' 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [6] ERROR: Couldn't send request to 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [2] INFO: No reply sent, denied. So my question is: how can I make the sms-service a dummy service, which does nothing, and does not take any resources. I could of course to a http://localhost or something, but I think this is a waste. I tried just leaving out the sms-service at all, but this gives me an error too. Any suggestions? Kind regards, Roland. -- [sangprabv] http://www.sangprabv.web.id
Re: Re[4]: Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service?
Hi, So you have an external daemon which check the send_sms table? How fast is it compares to HTTP? Apache has ModPerl which double the speed I guess. In 1 million MO do you experience MO lost? TIA Regards, Willy On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 10:57 +0300, seikath wrote: well , 1. i have here rules on insert dealing with the immediate replay, creating xml or for implementing the MT billing its not possible for mysql :) 2. you have external daemon processing the MO according certain rules as shortcodes and regexp ... which is universal for any db 3. you may patch the sqlbox for your particular needs .. these approaches are for HIGH MO traffic ... in case you have like 100 - 500 K daily, the apache will handle without any issues for sure. -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 Май 2008 г. To: seikath Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Hi, Just want to know. If we don't have post-url/get-url. Then how we parse the MO? Is it faster to check it directly to MySQL or just send it to an URL? Currently I combine the method. All MO are parsed via *-url. And the result stored to the MySQl and let the SQLBox pick it. Any other idea? What about the membox which is currently developed by Alejandro.G? Regards, Willy On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 19:25 +0300, seik wrote: exactly -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2008 ?. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Hi Seik, If I set the default one like this, I don't need the other service you suggested, right? I think setting a default service with an empty text would be sufficient. I didn't know about the omit empty = true setting, I guess that should do the trick right? So now I have this: # Default sms service. group = sms-service keyword = plaseireallydonotwatntheapachetohandlethisMTmessageTrankYou # get-url = http:// text = omit-empty = true catch-all = true max-messages = 0 That should work, right? Thanks for your help! I really appreciate it. Kind regards, Roland. seik wrote: some additional info: and set the default one with empty response text, and set omit empty = true .. i believe you got the idea -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2008 ?. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Nobody with any ideas? Rolandow wrote: Hi Guys, I am using kannel with the sqlbox, and I am directly processing my messages from the mysql database. So I thought I'd leave the default sms-service with an empty get-url. Unfortunately this gives me an error: 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [1] INFO: Starting to service Yesenia from 4671020481 to 10551 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [6] ERROR: URL doesn't start with `http://' nor `https://' 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [6] ERROR: Couldn't send request to 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [2] INFO: No reply sent, denied. So my question is: how can I make the sms-service a dummy service, which does nothing, and does not take any resources. I could of course to a http://localhost or something, but I think this is a waste. I tried just leaving out the sms-service at all, but this gives me an error too. Any suggestions? Kind regards, Roland. -- [sangprabv] http://www.sangprabv.web.id
unsubscribe
unsubscribe
Re[6]: Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service?
no lost MO sms so far, i work in both ways, according the service description have to say web servers have their limitations, especially in case when the db connection drops and suddenly kannel starts to flood the web server with its endless retries ... when the web server reaches the connection limit, you can imagine its getting even worse my usual setup is a sqlbox with db pool of PostgreSQL started with option for 2000 concurrent connections, which is far beyond the usual smpp concurrent peak load .. :) but, its a box i use for live TV voting shows with HUGE MO peaks ... these days i use the postgresql just to write xml files , there is a kernel inotify feature to watch the xml repository for a file creation on file creation i just process the xml data in parallel so i keep the postgresql only for th usual sqlbox activity, and the processing of the MO data is damn fast .. anyway, my advice: use the technology familiar with. -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 Май 2008 г. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Hi, So you have an external daemon which check the send_sms table? How fast is it compares to HTTP? Apache has ModPerl which double the speed I guess. In 1 million MO do you experience MO lost? TIA Regards, Willy On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 10:57 +0300, seikath wrote: well , 1. i have here rules on insert dealing with the immediate replay, creating xml or for implementing the MT billing its not possible for mysql 2. you have external daemon processing the MO according certain rules as shortcodes and regexp ... which is universal for any db 3. you may patch the sqlbox for your particular needs .. these approaches are for HIGH MO traffic ... in case you have like 100 - 500 K daily, the apache will handle without any issues for sure. -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 Май 2008 г. To: seikath Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Hi, Just want to know. If we don't have post-url/get-url. Then how we parse the MO? Is it faster to check it directly to MySQL or just send it to an URL? Currently I combine the method. All MO are parsed via *-url. And the result stored to the MySQl and let the SQLBox pick it. Any other idea? What about the membox which is currently developed by Alejandro.G? Regards, Willy On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 19:25 +0300, seik wrote: exactly -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2008 ?. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Hi Seik, If I set the default one like this, I don't need the other service you suggested, right? I think setting a default service with an empty text would be sufficient. I didn't know about the omit empty = true setting, I guess that should do the trick right? So now I have this: # Default sms service. group = sms-service keyword = plaseireallydonotwatntheapachetohandlethisMTmessageTrankYou # get-url = http:// text = omit-empty = true catch-all = true max-messages = 0 That should work, right? Thanks for your help! I really appreciate it. Kind regards, Roland. seik wrote: some additional info: and set the default one with empty response text, and set omit empty = true .. i believe you got the idea -Original Message- From: users@kannel.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 ??? 2008 ?. To: seik Subject:Using sqlbox, can I disable sms-service? Nobody with any ideas? Rolandow wrote: Hi Guys, I am using kannel with the sqlbox, and I am directly processing my messages from the mysql database. So I thought I'd leave the default sms-service with an empty get-url. Unfortunately this gives me an error: 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [1] INFO: Starting to service Yesenia from 4671020481 to 10551 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [6] ERROR: URL doesn't start with `http://' nor `https://' 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [6] ERROR: Couldn't send request to 2008-05-09 10:12:50 [21023] [2] INFO: No reply sent, denied. So my question is: how can I make the sms-service a dummy service, which does nothing, and does not take any resources. I could of course to a http://localhost or something, but I think this is a waste. I tried just leaving out the sms-service at all, but this gives me an error too. Any suggestions? Kind regards, Roland.
unsubscribe
unsubscribe
Message ID on SQLBox
Dear subscribers, I'm testing SQLBox standalone, it works fine, but I see that there is an ID field in the sent_sms table that is not being filled (MO or MT). This is supposed to be a Kannel-generated unique message ID. Does anyone know if there is a configuration parameter to set this? Thanks in advance. Eduardo -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador
Help Please!!!!!
How can I make an application to connect to kannel over smpp and not HTTP?
Re: Help Please!!!!!
2008/5/14 Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kannel can act as an SMPP _client_. That means, connect to an SMPP server (usaully a Carrier's SMSC) to send and receive messages. This is typically the case of ESMEs/VAS providers, where you have an application and want to send /receive messages to/from it. You need an SMPP server if you want a third party to connect to you using SMPP to send/receive messages over links you have with the carriers. This is tipically the case for integrators/resellers. There are a couple of such implementations, none free afaik. Stipe Tolj has one called smppbox, contact him in private if you want. Regards, Alejandro On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel, I have looked at that issue too and you should write your own smsbox that implements SMPP instead of HTTP. The Kannel user documentations says you can easily write one, but I guess that is only true if you are good with C language. My educated guess is that you should replace the smsbox's HTTP client with an SMPP client/server that would allow you to route messages in/out the bearerbox. The SMPP client part is already done in Kannel, so I'm sure you can re-use that. Does anyone know about an existing smppbox? Eduardo On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Gabriel Malva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I make an application to connect to kannel over smpp and not HTTP? -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador
Re: Help Please!!!!!
In my case it would be more interesting a direct connection the application with server side of kannel via SMPP protocol, but as yet it is not possible to have this solution, there is some expectation of kannel will propose this solution? ** 2008/5/14 Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kannel can act as an SMPP _client_. That means, connect to an SMPP server (usaully a Carrier's SMSC) to send and receive messages. This is typically the case of ESMEs/VAS providers, where you have an application and want to send /receive messages to/from it. You need an SMPP server if you want a third party to connect to you using SMPP to send/receive messages over links you have with the carriers. This is tipically the case for integrators/resellers. There are a couple of such implementations, none free afaik. Stipe Tolj has one called smppbox, contact him in private if you want. Regards, Alejandro On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel, I have looked at that issue too and you should write your own smsbox that implements SMPP instead of HTTP. The Kannel user documentations says you can easily write one, but I guess that is only true if you are good with C language. My educated guess is that you should replace the smsbox's HTTP client with an SMPP client/server that would allow you to route messages in/out the bearerbox. The SMPP client part is already done in Kannel, so I'm sure you can re-use that. Does anyone know about an existing smppbox? Eduardo On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Gabriel Malva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I make an application to connect to kannel over smpp and not HTTP? -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador
Re: Help Please!!!!!
Gabriel, That is exactly what smppbox from Stipe can do. It will enable a direct connection between an external application (ESME) and Kannel. In this case, Kannel acts as a SMPP server and your external application would act as the SMPP client. Eduardo On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Gabriel Malva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my case it would be more interesting a direct connection the application with server side of kannel via SMPP protocol, but as yet it is not possible to have this solution, there is some expectation of kannel will propose this solution? ** 2008/5/14 Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kannel can act as an SMPP _client_. That means, connect to an SMPP server (usaully a Carrier's SMSC) to send and receive messages. This is typically the case of ESMEs/VAS providers, where you have an application and want to send /receive messages to/from it. You need an SMPP server if you want a third party to connect to you using SMPP to send/receive messages over links you have with the carriers. This is tipically the case for integrators/resellers. There are a couple of such implementations, none free afaik. Stipe Tolj has one called smppbox, contact him in private if you want. Regards, Alejandro On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel, I have looked at that issue too and you should write your own smsbox that implements SMPP instead of HTTP. The Kannel user documentations says you can easily write one, but I guess that is only true if you are good with C language. My educated guess is that you should replace the smsbox's HTTP client with an SMPP client/server that would allow you to route messages in/out the bearerbox. The SMPP client part is already done in Kannel, so I'm sure you can re-use that. Does anyone know about an existing smppbox? Eduardo On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Gabriel Malva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I make an application to connect to kannel over smpp and not HTTP? -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador
Question about white-list and black-list
When I setup a black-list like: black-list = http://127.0.0.1/kannel/black-list.txt; in the core section of the kannel.conf file, and setup a single number in the file that it points to, I saw when it started that it found 1 number in it which is what I had in it. 2008-05-14 14:21:19 [8728] [0] INFO: Read from http://127.0.0.1/kannel/black-list.txt total of 1 numbers Question #1: Does that mean that the black-list list is only read once when the bearbox starts and not updated from time to time? I've not found an example of white-list-regex to see how I could use it to accept only US formatted phone numbers. But this brings up the second question... Question #2: If I use white-list-regex to accept any US formatted phone number, and a number matches an entry in the black-list list, will it be denied or accepted? -- Kevin Reed - TNET Services, Inc. For Mesa, AZ Weather http://www.TNETWeather.com
Re: Help Please!!!!!
Just a tought: I don't know your particular scenario and requirements, nor the reasons for your app to require such a setup, but maybe if you already have SMPP connections with the carriers you could bypass Kannel and implement the connections at application level. If that's your case, there's no need to use Kannel as a proxy between the 2 SMPP sides (unless you use it for routing/accounting/whatever, of course). Regards, Alejandro On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel, That is exactly what smppbox from Stipe can do. It will enable a direct connection between an external application (ESME) and Kannel. In this case, Kannel acts as a SMPP server and your external application would act as the SMPP client. Eduardo On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Gabriel Malva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my case it would be more interesting a direct connection the application with server side of kannel via SMPP protocol, but as yet it is not possible to have this solution, there is some expectation of kannel will propose this solution? ** 2008/5/14 Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kannel can act as an SMPP _client_. That means, connect to an SMPP server (usaully a Carrier's SMSC) to send and receive messages. This is typically the case of ESMEs/VAS providers, where you have an application and want to send /receive messages to/from it. You need an SMPP server if you want a third party to connect to you using SMPP to send/receive messages over links you have with the carriers. This is tipically the case for integrators/resellers. There are a couple of such implementations, none free afaik. Stipe Tolj has one called smppbox, contact him in private if you want. Regards, Alejandro On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel, I have looked at that issue too and you should write your own smsbox that implements SMPP instead of HTTP. The Kannel user documentations says you can easily write one, but I guess that is only true if you are good with C language. My educated guess is that you should replace the smsbox's HTTP client with an SMPP client/server that would allow you to route messages in/out the bearerbox. The SMPP client part is already done in Kannel, so I'm sure you can re-use that. Does anyone know about an existing smppbox? Eduardo On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Gabriel Malva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I make an application to connect to kannel over smpp and not HTTP? -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador -- Eduardo Raad Gerente General Metromovil móvil + 593 9397 oficina + 593 42329455 x 1099 Av. 10 de Agosto 511 y Chimborazo Edificio Equinoxcorp, Piso 3 Guayaquil, Ecuador
Re: Question about white-list and black-list
Kevin, Regarding question #1, afaik, the lists are read at bearerbox's start and they're not updated until restart. Regards, Alex On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Kevin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I setup a black-list like: black-list = http://127.0.0.1/kannel/black-list.txt; in the core section of the kannel.conf file, and setup a single number in the file that it points to, I saw when it started that it found 1 number in it which is what I had in it. 2008-05-14 14:21:19 [8728] [0] INFO: Read from http://127.0.0.1/kannel/black-list.txt total of 1 numbers Question #1: Does that mean that the black-list list is only read once when the bearbox starts and not updated from time to time? I've not found an example of white-list-regex to see how I could use it to accept only US formatted phone numbers. But this brings up the second question... Question #2: If I use white-list-regex to accept any US formatted phone number, and a number matches an entry in the black-list list, will it be denied or accepted? -- Kevin Reed - TNET Services, Inc. For Mesa, AZ Weather http://www.TNETWeather.com
Using keyword-regex
I am attempting to trap messages sent consisting of only 7 digit numbers.
The number is not valid unless they are exactly 7 digits so I wrote an
sms-service like:
group = sms-service
keyword = tr
keyword-regex = ^(\d{7})$
name = TankReading
aliases = store
exec = /usr/local/smsgateway/sms-command.pl store '%k'
max-messages = 2
concatenation = false
I even tried changing the rejex to:
keyword-regex = ^\d{7}$
Neither appears to work. It just falls through to the default sms-service
which sends back an invalid command.
Any ideas what is wrong?
If I use the service setup as:
group = sms-service
keyword = tr
name = TankReading
aliases = store
exec = /usr/local/smsgateway/sms-command.pl store '%s'
max-messages = 2
concatenation = false
It works fine if the sender includes TR space then the 7 digit number.
I'm trying to make it so that they don't need to add the TR, just send the
store number.
--
Kevin Reed - TNET Services, Inc.
For Mesa, AZ Weather http://www.TNETWeather.com
