Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for delivery

2009-01-09 Thread Pham Ngoc Khanh
Hi all,

I got a problem with the delivery report message about 0: Accepted for 
delivery. Below is my configuration

group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
admin-password = bar
log-file = /tmp/kannel.log
log-level = 0
box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1

group = modems
id = nokiaphone
name = Nokia
detect-string = Nokia
detect-string2 = E51
need-sleep = true
init-string = AT+CPMS=?

group = smsc
smsc = at
smsc-id=nokia
modemtype = nokiaphone
device=/dev/ttyACM0
my-number = x
sms-center = x
speed = 0

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = smpp
port = 2775
connect-allow-ip = *.*.*.*
host = localhost
smsc-username = smsc
smsc-password = smsc
system-type = VMA
address-range = 
denied-smsc-id = smpp;nokia

group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
sendsms-port = 13013
global-sender = 
log-level = 0

group = sendsms-user
username = user
password = user
concatenation= true

group = sms-service
keyword = default
text = No action specified

group = sms-service
keyword = mibento
get-url = 
http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=userfrom=%pto=%Ptext=%Ssmsc=nokia;
max-messages = 1
accepted-smsc = smpp

The problem is that after Kannel sent message to client it then sends the 
message 0: Accepted for delivery to client as well. I read somewhere on th 
internet that set: max-messages=0 will prevent sending reply message. But if I 
do that, Kannel does not send any message to client.
So could someone tell me what i was wrong, and help me out?

Thank in advance
K






Re: Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for delivery

2009-01-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas

Hi,

Well, you need to tell Kannel what to do with the DLR report it got. Have 
you tried specifying a dlr-url in your sms-service group?


I iamgine you talk about MOs.

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - 
From: Pham Ngoc Khanh pnk...@yahoo.com

To: Kannel users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:56 AM
Subject: Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for 
delivery



Hi all,

I got a problem with the delivery report message about 0: Accepted for 
delivery. Below is my configuration


group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
admin-password = bar
log-file = /tmp/kannel.log
log-level = 0
box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1

group = modems
id = nokiaphone
name = Nokia
detect-string = Nokia
detect-string2 = E51
need-sleep = true
init-string = AT+CPMS=?

group = smsc
smsc = at
smsc-id=nokia
modemtype = nokiaphone
device=/dev/ttyACM0
my-number = x
sms-center = x
speed = 0

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = smpp
port = 2775
connect-allow-ip = *.*.*.*
host = localhost
smsc-username = smsc
smsc-password = smsc
system-type = VMA
address-range = 
denied-smsc-id = smpp;nokia

group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
sendsms-port = 13013
global-sender = 
log-level = 0

group = sendsms-user
username = user
password = user
concatenation= true

group = sms-service
keyword = default
text = No action specified

group = sms-service
keyword = mibento
get-url = 
http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=userfrom=%pto=%Ptext=%Ssmsc=nokia;

max-messages = 1
accepted-smsc = smpp

The problem is that after Kannel sent message to client it then sends the 
message 0: Accepted for delivery to client as well. I read somewhere on th 
internet that set: max-messages=0 will prevent sending reply message. But if 
I do that, Kannel does not send any message to client.

So could someone tell me what i was wrong, and help me out?

Thank in advance
K







Re: Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for delivery

2009-01-09 Thread Marcin Bockowski
2009/1/9 Pham Ngoc Khanh pnk...@yahoo.com:
 group = sms-service
 keyword = mibento
 get-url = 
 http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=userfrom=%pto=%Ptext=%Ssmsc=nokia;
 max-messages = 1
 accepted-smsc = smpp

Change get-url param to place where Your SMS should go (Your
webservice or even simple hello.html file). In response You will
receive message with content coming from that URL.

 The problem is that after Kannel sent message to client it then sends the 
 message 0: Accepted for delivery to client as well. I read somewhere on th 
 internet that set: max-messages=0 will prevent sending reply message. But if 
 I do that, Kannel does not send any message to client.
 So could someone tell me what i was wrong, and help me out?

I hope it helps a bit.

Regards,

-- 
Marcin Boćkowski
:-D :-)


Re: Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for delivery

2009-01-09 Thread Monim Benaiad
NOTE: The get-url points to sendsms cgi itself, and the second sms you
receive is the result of submiting a msg to kannel.

On 1/9/09, Pham Ngoc Khanh pnk...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I got a problem with the delivery report message about 0: Accepted for
 delivery. Below is my configuration

 group = core
 admin-port = 13000
 smsbox-port = 13001
 admin-password = bar
 log-file = /tmp/kannel.log
 log-level = 0
 box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1

 group = modems
 id = nokiaphone
 name = Nokia
 detect-string = Nokia
 detect-string2 = E51
 need-sleep = true
 init-string = AT+CPMS=?

 group = smsc
 smsc = at
 smsc-id=nokia
 modemtype = nokiaphone
 device=/dev/ttyACM0
 my-number = x
 sms-center = x
 speed = 0

 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = smpp
 port = 2775
 connect-allow-ip = *.*.*.*
 host = localhost
 smsc-username = smsc
 smsc-password = smsc
 system-type = VMA
 address-range = 
 denied-smsc-id = smpp;nokia

 group = smsbox
 bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 sendsms-port = 13013
 global-sender = 
 log-level = 0

 group = sendsms-user
 username = user
 password = user
 concatenation= true

 group = sms-service
 keyword = default
 text = No action specified

 group = sms-service
 keyword = mibento
 get-url =
 http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=userfrom=%pto=%Ptext=%Ssmsc=nokia;
 max-messages = 1
 accepted-smsc = smpp

 The problem is that after Kannel sent message to client it then sends the
 message 0: Accepted for delivery to client as well. I read somewhere on th
 internet that set: max-messages=0 will prevent sending reply message. But if
 I do that, Kannel does not send any message to client.
 So could someone tell me what i was wrong, and help me out?

 Thank in advance
 K






-- 
Sent from my mobile device



Teltonika Modem

2009-01-09 Thread Abbas Qaizar

Hi Everyone,

Is there anyone in this list who has ever used TELTONIKA EDGE USB Modem / 
E12 without having any issue / problem ???


Thanks  Kind Regards

Abbas Qaizar




Re: Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for delivery

2009-01-09 Thread Pham Ngoc Khanh
As you could see from my configuration. There are two SMSCs. One works with GSM 
modem, and one works as SMPP client. I write my own application, and a SMPP 
server. My application and Kannel will connect to that SMPP server. When my 
application send message to client mobile, I want the GSM modem will do that 
job. So in the get-url, I point to the cgi to send SMS message. This 
configuration could send message to client but it also sends the 0: Accepted 
for delivery message.
Anyway, I will try to work around with the drl-url as you mention.

Thanks a lot. Will keep you update if I can solve this problem. Thanks again


--- On Fri, 9/1/09, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: Problem with delivery report message about 0: Accepted for 
 delivery
 To: pnk...@yahoo.com, Kannel users@kannel.org
 Date: Friday, 9 January, 2009, 5:22 PM
 Hi,
 
 Well, you need to tell Kannel what to do with the DLR
 report it got. Have you tried specifying a dlr-url in your
 sms-service group?
 
 I iamgine you talk about MOs.
 
 BR,
 Nikos
 - Original Message - From: Pham Ngoc
 Khanh pnk...@yahoo.com
 To: Kannel users@kannel.org
 Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:56 AM
 Subject: Problem with delivery report message about
 0: Accepted for delivery
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 I got a problem with the delivery report message about
 0: Accepted for delivery. Below is my
 configuration
 
 group = core
 admin-port = 13000
 smsbox-port = 13001
 admin-password = bar
 log-file = /tmp/kannel.log
 log-level = 0
 box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1
 
 group = modems
 id = nokiaphone
 name = Nokia
 detect-string = Nokia
 detect-string2 = E51
 need-sleep = true
 init-string = AT+CPMS=?
 
 group = smsc
 smsc = at
 smsc-id=nokia
 modemtype = nokiaphone
 device=/dev/ttyACM0
 my-number = x
 sms-center = x
 speed = 0
 
 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = smpp
 port = 2775
 connect-allow-ip = *.*.*.*
 host = localhost
 smsc-username = smsc
 smsc-password = smsc
 system-type = VMA
 address-range = 
 denied-smsc-id = smpp;nokia
 
 group = smsbox
 bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 sendsms-port = 13013
 global-sender = 
 log-level = 0
 
 group = sendsms-user
 username = user
 password = user
 concatenation= true
 
 group = sms-service
 keyword = default
 text = No action specified
 
 group = sms-service
 keyword = mibento
 get-url =
 http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=userpassword=userfrom=%pto=%Ptext=%Ssmsc=nokia;
 max-messages = 1
 accepted-smsc = smpp
 
 The problem is that after Kannel sent message to client it
 then sends the message 0: Accepted for delivery
 to client as well. I read somewhere on th internet that set:
 max-messages=0 will prevent sending reply message. But if I
 do that, Kannel does not send any message to client.
 So could someone tell me what i was wrong, and help me out?
 
 Thank in advance
 K






Re: wtls

2009-01-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Let me rephrase my question, because I am bombarded by humour :-)

In my experiences with wap I have never configured wtls. There are no examples 
in documentation. I have never needed it. When do we need to configure it in? 
Is it bearerbox or wapbox that uses it?


Looking at the source code i see that UDP 9200  9201 do not need wtls. 9202  
9203 need encryption and wtls.

So propably bearerbox opens the ports and wapbox decrypts them.

If i don't set wtls, bearerbox doesn't open the secure ports. So it is required.

certficate-file: I imagine it is a PEM server certificate
privatekey-file: PEM server Key file
privatekey-passwd: optional

Maybe it should go into the documentation.

Thanx,
Nikos
  - Original Message - 
  From: Nikos Balkanas 
  To: users@kannel.org 
  Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:07 PM
  Subject: wtls


  Hi,

  What is the wtls group for? And who uses it?

  Thanx,
  Nikos

Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR mysql

2009-01-09 Thread Drew Stockler
Are the logs you are looking for come from the bearerbox.txt and smsbox.txt 
files?

Thanks,
Drew

--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR mysql
To: Drew Stockler psustock1...@yahoo.com
Cc: users@kannel.org
Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 9:11 AM



 
No, you never reached the state of sending succesfully an SMS 
at the logs you send. 
 
For that i will need to see the logs of a succesfull run of 
sending an SMS.
 
BR,
Nikos

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Drew 
  Stockler 
  To: Nikos Balkanas 
  Sent:  January 09, 2009 4:26 
  PM
  Subject: Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR 
  mysql
  

  


  




  

Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR mysql

2009-01-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Bearebox mostly, but wouldn't hurt to have smsbox as well.


BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - 
  From: Drew Stockler 
  To: Nikos Balkanas 
  Cc: users@kannel.org 
  Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 5:18 PM
  Subject: Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR mysql


Are the logs you are looking for come from the bearerbox.txt and 
smsbox.txt files?

Thanks,
Drew

--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote:

  From: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR mysql
  To: Drew Stockler psustock1...@yahoo.com
  Cc: users@kannel.org
  Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 9:11 AM


  No, you never reached the state of sending succesfully an SMS at the 
logs you send. 

  For that i will need to see the logs of a succesfull run of sending 
an SMS.

  BR,
  Nikos
- Original Message - 
From: Drew Stockler 
To: Nikos Balkanas 
Sent:  January 09, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Installation with DLR mysql



 

   



unsubscribe;

2009-01-09 Thread Nauman Mazhar
unsubscribe


unsubscribe

2009-01-09 Thread Patrick Mignott
unsubscribe

 



1.41 vs cvs?

2009-01-09 Thread Richard Andrews
Hello,

I'm in the process of setting up our first kannel box for a proof of concept 
purposes.  If successful it will be put into full production (of course).  Is 
cvs stable for production and why hasn't stable release been updated if cvs 
is considered production ready?

Richard Andrews



Re: 1.41 vs cvs?

2009-01-09 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Richard,

CVS is about to get released as 1.4.2 pretty soon so yes, it's pretty stable
and you should prefer it over 1.4.1

Regards,

Alejandro

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Richard Andrews randr...@pelmorex.comwrote:

 Hello,

 I'm in the process of setting up our first kannel box for a proof of
 concept purposes.  If successful it will be put into full production (of
 course).  Is cvs stable for production and why hasn't stable release been
 updated if cvs is considered production ready?

 Richard Andrews




RE: 1.41 vs cvs?

2009-01-09 Thread Richard Andrews
Good news, thank you


Richard Andrews
Systems Administrator - IT Operations
Pelmorex Media Inc.
(905)  829-1159 x1243
randr...@pelmorex.com

-Original Message-
From: Villada, Gustavo [mailto:gvill...@telemediala.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:51 AM
To: Richard Andrews
Subject: RE: 1.41 vs cvs?

Richard,
CVS must be considered as stable for production.

Btw: this or next week will release 1.4.2 and 1.5 with TLV (metadata) support.

Best regards
Gus

-Original Message-
From: Richard Andrews [mailto:randr...@pelmorex.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:37 PM
To: 'users@kannel.org'
Subject: 1.41 vs cvs?

Hello,

I'm in the process of setting up our first kannel box for a proof of concept 
purposes.  If successful it will be put into full production (of course).  Is 
cvs stable for production and why hasn't stable release been updated if cvs 
is considered production ready?

Richard Andrews




Re: 1.41 vs cvs?

2009-01-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
FYI. Target date is this Sunday. So by the time you download cvs, 1.4.2 will 
propably be out.

BR,
Nikos
  - Original Message - 
  From: Alejandro Guerrieri 
  To: Richard Andrews 
  Cc: users@kannel.org 
  Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:49 PM
  Subject: Re: 1.41 vs cvs?


  Richard,

  CVS is about to get released as 1.4.2 pretty soon so yes, it's pretty stable 
and you should prefer it over 1.4.1

  Regards,

  Alejandro


  On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Richard Andrews randr...@pelmorex.com wrote:

Hello,

I'm in the process of setting up our first kannel box for a proof of 
concept purposes.  If successful it will be put into full production (of 
course).  Is cvs stable for production and why hasn't stable release been 
updated if cvs is considered production ready?

Richard Andrews





RE: 1.41 vs cvs?

2009-01-09 Thread Richard Andrews
Too compiled and making as we speak;) No big deal.

Richard Andrews



From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:55 AM
To: Alejandro Guerrieri; Richard Andrews
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: 1.41 vs cvs?

FYI. Target date is this Sunday. So by the time you download cvs, 1.4.2 will 
propably be out.

BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alejandro Guerrierimailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com
To: Richard Andrewsmailto:randr...@pelmorex.com
Cc: users@kannel.orgmailto:users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: 1.41 vs cvs?

Richard,

CVS is about to get released as 1.4.2 pretty soon so yes, it's pretty stable 
and you should prefer it over 1.4.1

Regards,

Alejandro

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Richard Andrews 
randr...@pelmorex.commailto:randr...@pelmorex.com wrote:
Hello,

I'm in the process of setting up our first kannel box for a proof of concept 
purposes.  If successful it will be put into full production (of course).  Is 
cvs stable for production and why hasn't stable release been updated if cvs 
is considered production ready?

Richard Andrews




Problem with GSM Modem - Connect in wvdial

2009-01-09 Thread isaac43

Hello i have a problem to connect my GSM Modem to Kannel the config and the
log files...

Kannel.conf
group = core
smsbox-port = 13001
admin-port = 13000
admin-password = bar
log-file = /var/log/kannel/bearerbox.log
log-level = 0
access-log = /var/log/kannel/access.log
store-file = /var/log/kannel/kannel.store
 
# SMSC GSM
group = smsc
smsc-id = GSMModem
smsc = at
modemtype = simcom_ltd
device = /dev/ttyUSB0
max-error-count = 1
speed = 460800
keepalive = 60
my-number = +507???
sms-center = ???
#access-log = modem.access.log
log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsc.log

# MODEM CONFIG
group = modems
id = simcom_ltd
name = simcom
detect-string = Modem
enable-hwhs = AT 
init-string =
AT+CNMI=2,1,0,1,1;+CMGF=0;+CPIN?;+CREG?;+COPS?;+CSCA?;+CPMS?;+CPBR=?;+CMEE=2; 
message-storage = SM
# PARA TEST:
keepalive-cmd = AT+CSQ
#reset-string = AT+CFUN=1 

modem.log
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] INFO: AT2[GSMModem]: opening device
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: device opened
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: device opened
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] INFO: AT2[GSMModem]: init device
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] INFO: AT2[GSMModem]: speed set to 460800
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: -- ATZ^M
2009-01-09 13:14:36 [9331] [6] ERROR: AT2[GSMModem]: Wrong or no answer to
ATZ, ignoring
2009-01-09 13:14:36 [9331] [6] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: -- AT^M

bearerbox.log

2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Added logfile
`/var/log/kannel/bearerbox.log' with level `0'.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Started access logfile
`/var/log/kannel/access.log'.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: SSL not supported, no SSL
initialization done.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1
(gwlib/fdset.c:poller)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [2] DEBUG: Thread 2 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread)
maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [1] DEBUG: Thread 1 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) maps
to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2
(gwlib/http.c:server_thread)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [3] DEBUG: Thread 3 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run)
maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3
(gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: starting smsbox connection module
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: BOXC: 'smsbox-max-pending' not set,
using default (100).
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [4] DEBUG: Thread 4
(gw/bb_boxc.c:sms_to_smsboxes) maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4
(gw/bb_boxc.c:sms_to_smsboxes)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [5] DEBUG: Thread 5 (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run)
maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 5
(gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Set SMS resend frequency to 60 seconds.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: SMS resend retry set to unlimited.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: DLR rerouting for smsc id GSMModem
disabled.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Added logfile
`/var/log/kannel/smsc.log' with level `0'.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: AT2[GSMModem]: configuration shows
modemtype simcom_ltd
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: Reading modem
definitions from /etc/kannel/kannel.conf
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: Found 1 modems in
config
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: AT2[GSMModem]: read modem definition
for simcom
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] DEBUG: Thread 6
(gw/smsc/smsc_at.c:at2_device_thread) maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [6] INFO: Logging thread `6' to logfile
`/var/log/kannel/smsc.log' with level `0'.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 6
(gw/smsc/smsc_at.c:at2_device_thread)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [7] DEBUG: Thread 7 (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router)
maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 30.00 secs.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 7
(gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO:

2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version 1.4.1
starting
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Loading store file
`/var/log/kannel/kannel.store'
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Store-file size 183, starting to unpack
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: Retrieved 1 messages, non-acknowledged
messages: 1
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [8] DEBUG: Thread 8 (gw/bb_store.c:store_dumper)
maps to pid 9331.
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 8
(gw/bb_store.c:store_dumper)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] INFO: MAIN: Start-up done, entering mainloop
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [0] DEBUG: AT2[GSMModem]: start called
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: gwlist_len = 1
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [7] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x91d8330 vs 0x91d8330)
2009-01-09 13:14:32 [9331] [7] DEBUG: 

Kannel carriage return issue

2009-01-09 Thread nam_ghs
Dear all,

We are using Kannel + playsms. When we send sms message from playsms web 
interface using carriage return the message arrives without the carriage return 
and all the words in one line. 
Can you please advise what configuration should be made to kannel for accepting 
carriage return or at least  let us know if previous same issues were found.

Thank you  Best Regards,

Re: Kannel carriage return issue

2009-01-09 Thread Alvaro Cornejo
you should urlencode your message before submitting to kannel

On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 22:10 +0200, nam_...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Dear all,
  
 We are using Kannel + playsms. When we send sms message from playsms
 web interface using carriage return the message arrives without the
 carriage return and all the words in one line. 
 Can you please advise what configuration should be made to kannel for
 accepting carriage return or at least  let us know if previous same
 issues were found.
  
 Thank you  Best Regards,