validity of sms
Hi, I just need to confirm if setting validityperiod to X minutes would send me the DLR in any case (success or failure) within X minutes max. ? Does it work like this? If not, please elaborate on its expected operation. Thanks.
Re: SMS lifetime
I would appreciate any help or maybe some ideas. Or my problem is unsolvable? On 2014-03-31 18:16, dorin wrote: Hello all! I want to configure SMS validity under sqlbox. As I read in documentation I must set parameter validity with desired minutes. in my case I have validity = 5 but on the SMSC arives 1032139564 minutes insted of 5. what I missed? p.s. SMSC support told me the same time zone as my server.
Unsubscribe
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Re: SMS lifetime
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Re: SMS lifetime
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 19:01, dorin wrote: I would appreciate any help or maybe some ideas. Or my problem is unsolvable? On 2014-03-31 18:16, dorin wrote: Hello all! I want to configure SMS validity under sqlbox. As I read in documentation I must set parameter validity with desired minutes. in my case I have validity = 5 but on the SMSC arives 1032139564 minutes insted of 5. what I missed? It is absolute time in UTC, IIRC. Read the specification about SMPP and Kannel documentation. -- Kind regards, Milan -- Arvanta,http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code or documents in proprietary format (word, excel, pps and so on)
Re: SMS lifetime
2014-03-31 19:16 GMT+04:00 dorin dorinafte...@mail.ru: Hello all! I want to configure SMS validity under sqlbox. As I read in documentation I must set parameter validity with desired minutes. in my case I have validity = 5 but on the SMSC arives 1032139564 minutes insted of 5. hello. check user-guide, there is a column called validity, you can specify in minutes how much time MT should be valid for. most likely you've got time out of sync with your SMPP provider, contact them and try to resolve this. it works fine. what I missed? p.s. SMSC support told me the same time zone as my server.
Re: Need SQLBox to bypass MO
Hi Rene, Thanks, I am thinking another approach. Why not for MO just bearerbox-smsbox and MT bearerbox-sqlbox? But still confusing how to manage the configuration, especially port mapping. Willy Mularto SMS Gateway, Content Provider, Mobile Solution Specialist M: +62811923464, +62818923464 PIN BBM: 74924429 On Apr 1, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: Connect 2 different smsboxes. 1 via sqlbox. The other directly to bearerbox. MT messages go via the first smsbox. MO messages are routed to the second. == Rene -Original Message- From: Willy Mularto [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 1 april 2014 3:09 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: kannel users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Need SQLBox to bypass MO Thanks Rene, it works. As my understanding the SQLBox still process MO but not to save it to the DB. How about to make Kannel directly send all MO to SMSBox, rather then transit first to SQLBox? So the final goal is SQLBox only process MT. Thanks. On Mar 31, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: In group = sqlbox. If you build latest documentation, it's there. -Original Message- From: Willy Mularto [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 31 maart 2014 4:04 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: kannel users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Need SQLBox to bypass MO Hi Rene, Thanks for the tips, is it a new directive? Because I can not find it in the user guide. Where to put the directive? Thanks. On Mar 30, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: Set save-mo = false -Original Message- From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Willy Mularto Sent: zondag 30 maart 2014 15:25 To: kannel users@kannel.org Subject: Need SQLBox to bypass MO Hi All, Can somebody please refresh me to set SQLBOX ignore all MO to be proceed by SQLBox and just past it from Bearerbox to SMSBox. Thanks. Willy Mularto
Re: Need SQLBox to bypass MO
It’s me again. Got how to manage it with my approach. Thanks again. Willy Mularto SMS Gateway, Content Provider, Mobile Solution Specialist M: +62811923464, +62818923464 PIN BBM: 74924429 On Apr 3, 2014, at 7:46 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rene, Thanks, I am thinking another approach. Why not for MO just bearerbox-smsbox and MT bearerbox-sqlbox? But still confusing how to manage the configuration, especially port mapping. Willy Mularto SMS Gateway, Content Provider, Mobile Solution Specialist M: +62811923464, +62818923464 PIN BBM: 74924429 On Apr 1, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: Connect 2 different smsboxes. 1 via sqlbox. The other directly to bearerbox. MT messages go via the first smsbox. MO messages are routed to the second. == Rene -Original Message- From: Willy Mularto [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 1 april 2014 3:09 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: kannel users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Need SQLBox to bypass MO Thanks Rene, it works. As my understanding the SQLBox still process MO but not to save it to the DB. How about to make Kannel directly send all MO to SMSBox, rather then transit first to SQLBox? So the final goal is SQLBox only process MT. Thanks. On Mar 31, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: In group = sqlbox. If you build latest documentation, it's there. -Original Message- From: Willy Mularto [mailto:sangpr...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 31 maart 2014 4:04 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: kannel users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Need SQLBox to bypass MO Hi Rene, Thanks for the tips, is it a new directive? Because I can not find it in the user guide. Where to put the directive? Thanks. On Mar 30, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote: Set save-mo = false -Original Message- From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Willy Mularto Sent: zondag 30 maart 2014 15:25 To: kannel users@kannel.org Subject: Need SQLBox to bypass MO Hi All, Can somebody please refresh me to set SQLBOX ignore all MO to be proceed by SQLBox and just past it from Bearerbox to SMSBox. Thanks. Willy Mularto
