Re: unsubscribe
2014-08-19 8:50 GMT+01:00 Jorge Fernando Garcia Diaz < jorge.fernando.garcia.d...@ericsson.com>: > >
Re: Kannel Information Request
Yes but it is a solution to encrypt the http using ssl (instead of nginx) but dosn't resolve the issue. The deliver_sm sent by the instance 1 will be converted to a submit_sm in the instance 2. 2013/8/28 spameden > You can use built-in SSL support instead: > > > http://www.kannel.org/download/1.4.3/userguide-1.4.3/userguide.html#SSL-ENABLING > > > 2013/8/28 Ahmed ben ali > >> Hello Spameden, >> >> Thanks you for your response, I m totally agree with you but >> unfortunately I have no possibility to use OpenVPN tunnel, it s a decision >> of security team (many complicated reasons unfortunately). >> My idea is to convert smpp to http (via kannel) and redirect the http to >> https (via nginx). That's why I need to connect 2 kannel instancies. I >> didn't describe the https redirection to simplify the euse case. >> finally : >> smpp --> http --> https >https --> http --> smpp : I want to >> recover the same >> initial message without any change (deliver-sm must be keeped deliver_sm >> and the same think for de submit_sm) >> >> I hope it is more clear >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> >> 2013/8/27 spameden >> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/8/27 Ahmed ben ali >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I explain my need : >>>> I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is >>>> not possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have >>>> smpp flow and I want to securise it. >>>> >>> >>> How do you want to secure it? The best practice is to set OpenVPN tunnel >>> or any other VPN between two nodes and let traffic flow through it. >>> >>> >>>> The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and >>>> convert smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I >>>> reconvert it to smpp to send it to the ESME. >>>> >>> >>> HTTP is not secure, and can be sniffed easily as well as SMPP. >>> >>> >>>> I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) >>>> and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). >>>> But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that >>>> I sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a >>>> deliver_sm along this way : >>>> SMSC (smpp) --> kannel 1(http) ---> (http) kannel 2 (smpp) --> >>>> ESME >>>> >>>> Thanks for help >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Ahmed BEN ALI >>>> >>> >>> >> >
Re: Kannel Information Request
Hello Spameden, Thanks you for your response, I m totally agree with you but unfortunately I have no possibility to use OpenVPN tunnel, it s a decision of security team (many complicated reasons unfortunately). My idea is to convert smpp to http (via kannel) and redirect the http to https (via nginx). That's why I need to connect 2 kannel instancies. I didn't describe the https redirection to simplify the euse case. finally : smpp --> http --> https >https --> http --> smpp : I want to recover the same initial message without any change (deliver-sm must be keeped deliver_sm and the same think for de submit_sm) I hope it is more clear Thanks a lot. 2013/8/27 spameden > > > > 2013/8/27 Ahmed ben ali > >> Hello, >> >> I explain my need : >> I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not >> possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have >> smpp flow and I want to securise it. >> > > How do you want to secure it? The best practice is to set OpenVPN tunnel > or any other VPN between two nodes and let traffic flow through it. > > >> The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert >> smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it >> to smpp to send it to the ESME. >> > > HTTP is not secure, and can be sniffed easily as well as SMPP. > > >> I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) >> and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). >> But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I >> sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a >> deliver_sm along this way : >> SMSC (smpp) --> kannel 1(http) ---> (http) kannel 2 (smpp) --> >> ESME >> >> Thanks for help >> >> Best Regards, >> Ahmed BEN ALI >> > >
Re: Kannel Information Request
Hi All, Someone has an idea, please ? Best Regards, 2013/8/27 Ahmed ben ali > Hello, > > I explain my need : > I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not > possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have > smpp flow and I want to securise it. > The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert > smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it > to smpp to send it to the ESME. > I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) > and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). > But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I > sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a > deliver_sm along this way : > SMSC (smpp) --> kannel 1(http) ---> (http) kannel 2 (smpp) --> ESME > > Thanks for help > > Best Regards, > >
Kannel Information Request
Hello, I explain my need : I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have smpp flow and I want to securise it. The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it to smpp to send it to the ESME. I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a deliver_sm along this way : SMSC (smpp) --> kannel 1(http) ---> (http) kannel 2 (smpp) --> ESME Thanks for help Best Regards, Ahmed BEN ALI
