Re: How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status
Hi You can modify sqlbox and change the LIMIT X parameter on the reading statement to adjust the number of records to move to kannel on each loop. Note that this will increase the throughput from sqlbox to bearerbox; it will not change the smsc throughput. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.com On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Aditya Khanna aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, Currently, I'm testing my application with Fake SMSC Connections. One more thing I'm facing a problem regarding sqlbox tables. When I'm inserting message into send_sms table then sqlbox inserts all records in sent_sms table. I'm analysing, it is too low (10-20 message/second). So how to increase this. Thanks, Aditya Khanna On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:49 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-12-03 12:57 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com: Hello Everyone, I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's). Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then it is show in queue of SMSC. I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP. Try using sqlbox instead with priority field (alter sqlbox source to include ORDER by priority field) and INSERT messages with higher priority (e.g. = 0) Example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8458566/implementing-priority-queue-in-kannel Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue. So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message to a free SMSC port. You can always specify free SMSC uplink with: smsc_id= via HTTP call or use smsc_id in sqlbox send_sms table. For higher throughput read about max-pending-submits as well as consult your upstream SMSC operator. Please share your valuable suggestions. Thanks, Aditya Khanna
Re: How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status
Hello Everyone, Currently, I'm testing my application with Fake SMSC Connections. One more thing I'm facing a problem regarding sqlbox tables. When I'm inserting message into send_sms table then sqlbox inserts all records in sent_sms table. I'm analysing, it is too low (10-20 message/second). So how to increase this. Thanks, Aditya Khanna On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:49 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-12-03 12:57 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com: Hello Everyone, I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's). Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then it is show in queue of SMSC. I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP. Try using sqlbox instead with priority field (alter sqlbox source to include ORDER by priority field) and INSERT messages with higher priority (e.g. = 0) Example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8458566/implementing-priority-queue-in-kannel Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue. So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message to a free SMSC port. You can always specify free SMSC uplink with: smsc_id= via HTTP call or use smsc_id in sqlbox send_sms table. For higher throughput read about max-pending-submits as well as consult your upstream SMSC operator. Please share your valuable suggestions. Thanks, Aditya Khanna
How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status
Hello Everyone, I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's). Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then it is show in queue of SMSC. I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP. Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue. So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message to a free SMSC port. Please share your valuable suggestions. Thanks, Aditya Khanna
Re: How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status
Hey, Try creating multiple SMSC groups to achieve multiple connections to the SMSC to create parallelism. Then choose different smsc ids when sending from your calling script. Since this is a HTTP connection, the SMSC might come in only when you exceed their set of SMS/SEC throughput. Thanks Moses On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Aditya Khanna aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's). Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then it is show in queue of SMSC. I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP. Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue. So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message to a free SMSC port. Please share your valuable suggestions. Thanks, Aditya Khanna
Re: How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status
2014-12-03 12:57 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com: Hello Everyone, I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's). Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then it is show in queue of SMSC. I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP. Try using sqlbox instead with priority field (alter sqlbox source to include ORDER by priority field) and INSERT messages with higher priority (e.g. = 0) Example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8458566/implementing-priority-queue-in-kannel Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue. So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message to a free SMSC port. You can always specify free SMSC uplink with: smsc_id= via HTTP call or use smsc_id in sqlbox send_sms table. For higher throughput read about max-pending-submits as well as consult your upstream SMSC operator. Please share your valuable suggestions. Thanks, Aditya Khanna
