Re: [Djigzo users] Upgrade 2.10 to 3.05

2016-05-18 Thread Martijn Brinkers
On 05/18/2016 04:13 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > > Zitat von Martijn Brinkers : > >> On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with >>> releases. The upgrade guide list a

Re: [Djigzo users] Upgrade 2.10 to 3.05

2016-05-18 Thread Martijn Brinkers
On 05/18/2016 04:13 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > > Zitat von Martijn Brinkers : > >> On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with >>> releases. The upgrade guide list a

Re: [Djigzo users] Upgrade 2.10 to 3.05

2016-05-18 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Martijn Brinkers : On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Hello, we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027 needed for this release an i wonder why it

Re: [Djigzo users] Upgrade 2.10 to 3.05

2016-05-18 Thread Martijn Brinkers
On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > Hello, > > we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with > releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027 > needed for this release an i wonder why it is needed. Should mail > injected there be

[Djigzo users] Upgrade 2.10 to 3.05

2016-05-18 Thread lst_hoe02
Hello, we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027 needed for this release an i wonder why it is needed. Should mail injected there be passed through the djigzo gateway (again)? If yes, why not