On 05/18/2016 04:13 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Martijn Brinkers :
>
>> On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
>>> releases. The upgrade guide list a
On 05/18/2016 04:13 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Martijn Brinkers :
>
>> On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
>>> releases. The upgrade guide list a
Zitat von Martijn Brinkers :
On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Hello,
we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027
needed for this release an i wonder why it
On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
> releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027
> needed for this release an i wonder why it is needed. Should mail
> injected there be
Hello,
we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027
needed for this release an i wonder why it is needed. Should mail
injected there be passed through the djigzo gateway (again)? If yes,
why not