[389-users] NIS 389 Directory Server

2011-05-18 Thread Neuhold Christian (TSA)
Hello, for user authentication we use NIS on a Solaris System. Solaris 7/8/9 and Redhat 4/5 access this domain. Now I want to migrate to fedora directoryserver. What I have done: * Installed Redhat 5 x86_64 * Installed 389 from EPEL * Imported NIS Data into 389 with LdapImport from Babel *

[389-users] help

2011-05-18 Thread Neuhold Christian (TSA)
help -~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or

[389-users] read_state: failed to get generator's state

2011-05-18 Thread Jim Tyrrell
Hi, I have a setup with 3 389 Directory servers in a master-master setup which has been working fine until now. One of the servers died this morning due to a memory issue and now will not restart: [18/May/2011:12:34:32 +0100] memory allocator - malloc of 1538 bytes failed; OS error 12

Re: [389-users] replication with ssl

2011-05-18 Thread solarflow99
This is the latest: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el5 I think its something simple, since I have it working, but just not over startTLS on port 389. When I change the replication agreement to: use StartTLS, the replication status shows: LDAP error: Protocol Error. Error code: 2 The docs didn't say

Re: [389-users] replication with ssl

2011-05-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/18/2011 10:28 AM, solarflow99 wrote: This is the latest: 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el5 I think its something simple, since I have it working, but just not over startTLS on port 389. When I change the replication agreement to: use StartTLS, the replication status shows: LDAP error:

[389-users] windows sync question

2011-05-18 Thread solarflow99
I have a question about windows sync, in the docs it says the replica role should be single or multi master, but with single master you can't set update settings for the bind DN. Will this still work? Is there a way to sync 1 way, from windows AD - dirsrv only? Thanks, -- 389 users mailing list

Re: [389-users] NIS 389 Directory Server

2011-05-18 Thread Neuhold Christian (TSA)
Hello, thanks for tip with {CRYPT}. I made some testing and played with nis-value-format: [root@xxx ~]# ypcat users | grep tst tst:{crypt}xOf6b2C9ZsCsA:1346:21:Test:/user/tst:/bin/csh -- Definition from users in dse.ldif: dn: nis-domain=amsint+nis-map=users,cn=NIS Server,cn=plugins,cn=config

Re: [389-users] NIS 389 Directory Server

2011-05-18 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:28:49PM +0200, Neuhold Christian (TSA) wrote: Hello, thanks for tip with {CRYPT}. I made some testing and played with nis-value-format: [root@xxx ~]# ypcat users | grep tst tst:{crypt}xOf6b2C9ZsCsA:1346:21:Test:/user/tst:/bin/csh -- Definition from users in

Re: F14: after kernel update, can't boot (from software RAID) [SOLVED]

2011-05-18 Thread Neil Bird
Around about 11/05/11 10:25, Neil Bird typed ... I did a belated update of my Fedora 14 box last night, which included a new kernel (2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686.PAE, previous was 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAE). However, upon trying to boot, it slept for a little bit, then said something like:

Netstat Ouput - Where?

2011-05-18 Thread Dan Track
Hi, when I run netstat -s I get a whole listing of different statistics on udp/tcp. what I would like is to be able to marry up those terms e.g. TCPLossFailures with the appropriate TCP terminology. There must be some refernce guide somewhere that shows what these fields mean or what they are

[OT] My paranoia and skype, was Re: Protected WLAN

2011-05-18 Thread Rick Sewill
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 07:01:53 AM Marko Vojinovic wrote: Except for skype, of course... ;-) But that's old news. And now that Microsoft took it over, they will probably trade with the nsa for a backdoor... :-) I apologize for the off topic remarks I am about to make. I would be very

Re: [OT] My paranoia and skype, was Re: Protected WLAN

2011-05-18 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:39, Rick Sewill rsew...@gmail.com wrote: My paranoia causes me to believe the back doors don't stop with text chat. My paranoia causes me to believe multiple governments demanded back doors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Software Prior to that year, Lotus had

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:38 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote: On 17 May 2011 21:35, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I read somewhere that Firefox 4 contains a feature that prevents websites from grabbing your local

Re: [389-users] read_state: failed to get generator's state

2011-05-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/18/2011 06:36 AM, Jim Tyrrell wrote: Hi, I have a setup with 3 389 Directory servers in a master-master setup which has been working fine until now. One of the servers died this morning due to a memory issue and now will not restart: [18/May/2011:12:34:32 +0100] memory allocator -

Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?

2011-05-18 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 05/11/2011 08:58 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: $8.5 BB is a pretty serious premium for a company with zero revenue (ever) which sold 2 times previously - first to ebay for $2.5 BB and after that something 1 BB ... still no revenue but a decent enough brand. What Skype has is technology that

bios update

2011-05-18 Thread Sebastian
Apologies if this has been discussed, I couldn't find it. I have a single boot FC14 system on a Dell precision M6500 precision notebook and wish to update the BIOS. I go to the Dell download site, and for my machine select the closest match to my operating system: RH Enterprise Linux 5. This

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread bruce
check under the edit/preferences/advanced/general... in the 2nd batch of checkboxes On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:38 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote: On 17 May 2011

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread Bryce Hardy
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:38 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote: On 17 May 2011 21:35, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I read somewhere that Firefox 4

Re: [389-users] NIS 389 Directory Server

2011-05-18 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:22:21PM +0200, Neuhold Christian (TSA) wrote: ypcat passwd old system: [root@xxx slapd-xxx]# ypcat passwd | grep tst tst:*:1346:21:Test:/user/tst:/bin/csh ypcat passwd new system: [root@xxx ~]# ypcat passwd | grep tst

Re: [389-users] replication with ssl

2011-05-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/18/2011 08:35 AM, solarflow99 wrote: I just wonder why i'm getting: RESULT err=2 when I try to use replication over simple SSL. The replication agreement works when I use ldap with no encryption, but when I select SSL encryption with ldap it just gives that error. I'm not looking to

Re: Amazing Linux victory!

2011-05-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:48:08 +0200 Rudolf Kastl wrote: I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7.

Fedora 14 Hal Daemon Issue

2011-05-18 Thread Shawn Haley
Hello, I recently updated with the latest batch of updates (including kernel 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64) and after a reboot the Hal Daemon service won't start. Here is the error in the messages log: May 13 11:12:42 phoenix kernel: [ 27.946993] hald[1677]: segfault at 0 ip

Re: Fedora 14 Hal Daemon Issue

2011-05-18 Thread Manuel Trujillo (TooManySecrets)
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Shawn Haley sha...@crosscurrent.com wrote:     I recently updated with the latest batch of updates (including kernel 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64) and after a reboot the Hal Daemon service won’t start.  Here is the error in the messages log: May 13

Re: Protected WLAN

2011-05-18 Thread Tim
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:20 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: Another possible application is if you have a number of devices in a department and you want to revoke access for one for some reason, but you don't want to change passwords every time you do this, so you can temporarily disable access until

Re: [389-users] windows sync question

2011-05-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/18/2011 11:38 AM, solarflow99 wrote: I have a question about windows sync, in the docs it says the replica role should be single or multi master, but with single master you can't set update settings for the bind DN. Will this still work? Use single master if this server will not

Re: bios update

2011-05-18 Thread aragonx
That bios update can be done from DOS:

Re: bios update

2011-05-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:55:24 -0300, Sebastian seb...@gmail.com wrote: I have a single boot FC14 system on a Dell precision M6500 precision notebook and wish to update the BIOS. I go to the Dell download site, and for my machine select the closest match to my operating system: RH

Re: bios update

2011-05-18 Thread Robert Nichols
On 05/18/2011 08:55 AM, Sebastian wrote: Apologies if this has been discussed, I couldn't find it. I have a single boot FC14 system on a Dell precision M6500 precision notebook and wish to update the BIOS. I go to the Dell download site, and for my machine select the closest match to my

glibc issue?

2011-05-18 Thread aragonx
Hello all, I have a strange question.  I got some piece of software that was compiled on a different version of linux and I'm running into some issues.  If I run the executable I get: Linux ./SDC ./SDC: error while loading shared libraries: libdcmAccess4C.so: cannot open shared object

Re: bios update

2011-05-18 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:55 -0300, Sebastian wrote: Apologies if this has been discussed, I couldn't find it. I have a single boot FC14 system on a Dell precision M6500 precision notebook and wish to update the BIOS. I am confused. Your BIOS has nothing to do with the operating system you

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 07:02 -0700, bruce wrote: check under the edit/preferences/advanced/general... in the 2nd batch of checkboxes Thanks that worked to stop tracking. But I am still confused by the official directions to use an option under tools? --

Ruby ???

2011-05-18 Thread james tate
I have downloaded a Ruby script file that has line numbers in it, and it does not Run like that. Are the line numbers supposed to be removed before running ? the start of the script; This is just the first 25 lines of the script. 1 1 #!/usr/bin/ruby -w 2 3 # Try to find

Re: Netstat Ouput - Where?

2011-05-18 Thread Marvin Kosmal
On 5/18/11, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, when I run netstat -s I get a whole listing of different statistics on udp/tcp. what I would like is to be able to marry up those terms e.g. TCPLossFailures with the appropriate TCP terminology. There must be some refernce guide somewhere

Re: Ruby ???

2011-05-18 Thread H Xu
On 2011/5/19 7:06, james tate wrote: I have downloaded a Ruby script file that has line numbers in it, and it does not Run like that. Are the line numbers supposed to be removed before running ? You should remove them. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: Ruby ???

2011-05-18 Thread Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus
Well, the script isn't too long so you can open it easily with gedit, kate or your favorite editor and remove the repeated number of line and that's all. You don't need to complicate your life. Good Luck: Aradnix -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Orinoco WiFi cards

2011-05-18 Thread Timothy Murphy
Is anyone using one of the classic Orinoco PCMCIA cards (Silver or Gold) with Fedora 14? I have two computers with these cards. One has an Orinoco card as part of a PCI-to-PCMCIA system. This bombs out under Fedora-14 with an OOPS which prevents booting. The other is a ThinkPad T43, which just

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread bruce
umm.. no. it doesn't stop tracking, unless the website you're looking at has agreed to not track you!! the tracking thing is purely voluntary and happens on the serverside/ad network side... all the tracking check does is kind of ask the site to now track you!! no guarantee that won't happen..

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread Genes MailLists
On 05/18/2011 09:49 PM, bruce wrote: no guarantee that won't happen.. if you really don't want to be tracked. clean out your cookies regularly, as well as change your dynamic ip address every couple of hours... there you go! Also delete your flash cookies and turn them off - and

Re: security in firefox4

2011-05-18 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:02:54PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: Also delete your flash cookies and turn them off ... Yes. flash P2P as well for good measure. Couldn't hurt. Many of the 'bad guys' have switched primarily to flash cookies now ... so deleting the regular cookies wont

Re: bios update

2011-05-18 Thread Doron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/18/2011 04:55 PM, Sebastian wrote: Apologies if this has been discussed, I couldn't find it. I have a single boot FC14 system on a Dell precision M6500 precision notebook and wish to update the BIOS. check out this thread

Re: Protected WLAN

2011-05-18 Thread charles zeitler
-- Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:04 AM, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/17/11 21:15, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 05/17/2011 11:36 PM, JD wrote:. I'm waiting for the next level new security that is unbreakable before buying my next new home

Re: Protected WLAN

2011-05-18 Thread JD
On 05/18/11 20:33, charles zeitler wrote: -- Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:04 AM, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/17/11 21:15, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 05/17/2011 11:36 PM, JD wrote:. I'm waiting for the next level new security that