Can you try to set up a simple LDAP authentication for a directory? It
does not have to be SVN, just a normal one (with some files in it).
Regards,
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Hi,
We are starting installations of four 389 DS, version 1.2.11 and would like to
pass an inf file together with command line parameters to
setup-ds-admin.pl script.
At the moment we have one 389 DS instance installed where Configuration
Directory (o=NetscapeRoot ) is placed and where TLS/SSL
On 06/14/2013 05:47 AM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi,
We are starting installations of four 389 DS, version 1.2.11 and would
like to pass an inf file together with command line parameters to
setup-ds-admin.pl script.
At the moment we have one 389 DS instance installed where
I wanted to update that this issue has been resolved and was due to a bug
in XWin-32 2010. Upgrading to the new 2012 version resolved the issue.
Now on to 'serious' 389 DS issues ;-)...
Herb
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Herb Burnswell herbert.burnsw...@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
I did a
This is a bug.
Please file a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/389/newticket
On 06/14/2013 11:09 AM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote:
Thanks Rich,
Still, there is a difference when CA certificate is supplied when
prompted and when listed in inf file.
In the latter case, neither the
If the operation fails to write into the changelog, the operation fails. In
your case, it means that the ldapclient should receive an error.
So it is like if the operation never happened and is not replicated.
Hi Thierry,
That’s what I would expect to, but that does not seem to be the case.
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 12:37 +0800, LingxianGuo wrote:
As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
the file of libflashplayer.so to
On 14.06.2013 00:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
…
...snip...
http://goo.gl/DXmGg
I'm not sure how to fix that off hand.
I will have to look into it more.
kevin
http://goo.gl/DXmGg - 'About-BFO-shade.png'
poma
diff --git a/bfo/pxelinux.cfg/bfo.conf b/bfo/pxelinux.cfg/bfo.conf
index
Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/10/13 19:05, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/10/13 18:11, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Few moments ago I report bug, but against wrong package (I report it
as x11vnc bug, but it seems be libvncserver bug). How I can change
to which component bug belongs
Hi,
i have a webserver (apache 2.4/php5/mysql 5.6) and i want to be sure it
is setup to use FastCGI.
when i execute phpinfo(); i can see (in loaded modules):
[CODE]
mod_proxy_fcgi
mod_proxy_scgi
mod_cgi
mod_php5
[/CODE]
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2013, Frantisek Hanzlik sent:
- when I'm allready logged in before, then after entering bug URL
I have non-selectable Component item, with clickable '(edit)' item.
Clicking on it I see (shadowed and non-selectable) my component item
- but voila - after waiting
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
discovered
that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora
On 14.06.2013 13:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 13:21, schrieb Rafnews:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while
On 06/13/2013 11:37 PM, LingxianGuo wrote:
As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
the file of libflashplayer.so to
Le 14/06/2013 14:33, Rafnews a écrit :
Situation:
i installed on Fedora 18 a webserver where i need:
- FastCGI
- to use my standard fedora user account (let's say rafnews) to
edit/move/delete files/folder in my webroot /var/www/html folders, where
files have 644 as permissions and folders :
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:38:40AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
remove the comment before the 2nd line here so it looks like this:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Still as root, edit the groups file:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:07:16PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
for now, all files/folders have correct permissions but owner is
apache:apache
Once again : apache don't need to own the files, only to be able to
read them.
And in fact, letting apache write to files it doesn't need to is a big
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2013, Rafnews sent:
Goal:
i'm trying to create at home a webserver for testing purposes, having
the same behavior as webhosting companies offers.
the purpose behind that it's to have a representative environment when
testing to not have particular surprises
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
...
(this was my case, an I newer wait so long, thus I newer see
selectable menu).
newer - never
(sorry)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:20:16AM +0930, Tim wrote:
I'm not familiar with FastCGI, but just looking quickly at it, it looks
like a replacement program so that *it* runs your CGI instead of Apache
doing it. I don't know if that's a real advantage, or just a perceived
one.
It's a real
On 06/14/2013 12:37 AM, LingxianGuo wrote:
As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
the file of libflashplayer.so to
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:25:39AM -0400, Doug wrote:
While you are supposed to use visudo to edit sudoers, that
requires that you know how to use the vi editor. Visudo is designed
to catch mistakes that you make. However, you can edit sudoers with
any editor; it is only a text file and
On 14.06.2013 13:21, Rafnews wrote:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on
internet i discovered
that
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:25:39AM -0400, Doug wrote:
On 06/14/2013 12:37 AM, LingxianGuo wrote:
As a beginner,I am using Fedora18 64bit.The Firefox needs the plugin of
the Adobe flash Player,I have downloaded the file of
install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz.By terminal, when I copied
On 06/14/2013 08:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
remove the comment before the 2nd line here so it looks like this:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to do
On 06/14/2013 08:40 AM, Rafnews issued this missive:
On 14.06.2013 13:21, Rafnews wrote:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account.
On 06/14/2013 12:42 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 06/14/2013 08:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
remove the comment before the 2nd line here so it looks like this:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm...
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Doug wrote:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to do it. In any case,
it was commented on the two CentOS 6
On 06/14/2013 01:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Doug wrote:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to do it. In any case,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:51:42PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm... Maybe it's been so long since I've had to do it. In any case,
it was commented on the two CentOS 6 systems I just set up.
In my sudoers, that line
On 06/14/2013 11:51 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
OK, let's now have some fun
sudo cp /bin/bash /bin/mylocalshell
sudo mylocalshell
I know this is preventable, but it's something to think about. No one
should have sudo who you would not trust with root itself. sudo just
adds a layer of
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:21:44PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
sudo cp /bin/bash /bin/mylocalshell
sudo mylocalshell
I know this is preventable, but it's something to think about. No one
should have sudo who you would not trust with root itself. sudo just
adds a layer of accountability.
On 06/14/2013 01:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Oh no. Start with 'sudo bash' or 'sudo su'. People do this all the time.
Then `unset HISTFILE`. Then do the above not with sudo.
But this is very off-topic.
It is and it isn't. If nothing else, it makes it clear just how easy it
is to gain
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
Same thing happens to me. I can run netflix-desktop from the Ubuntu PPA
on this
same hardware in Debian Wheezy, but my results match yours with the
Fedora package.
What desktop are using? I was tempted to
Hi,
I am running Fedora 19 + updates-testing and suddenly rsyslogd went crazy,
and is now consuming constantly 120% cpu (and is also constantly expanding
allocated memory).
I first thought it could have something to do with updates I've applied
recently, so I rolled back to an older
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:10:08 +0200
Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am running Fedora 19 + updates-testing and suddenly rsyslogd went
crazy, and is now consuming constantly 120% cpu (and is also
constantly expanding allocated memory).
I first thought it could have
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:28:16 +
Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Same thing happens to me. I can run netflix-desktop from the
Ubuntu PPA on this same hardware in Debian Wheezy, but my results
match yours with the Fedora package.
What desktop are using? I was tempted
from:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f17.html
Personal Fedora 17 Installation Guide
by Mauriat Miranda (http://www.mjmwired.net/contact/)
echo 'loginname ALL=(ALL) ALL' /etc/sudoers
Where 'loginname' is your user account.
easier for me, no need for that awful 'vi'
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today, if
got the following message:
[root@localhost ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
updates/18/x86_64/metalink | 16 kB
00:00
Traceback (most recent
Kevin Fenzi writes:
http://www.happyassassin.net/2013/06/14/fedora-1920-logfile-explosions/
Did I read this right? /var/log/messages have been replaced by binary goo?
pgpECfWLErgPF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:36 -0700
Paul Erickson va...@telus.net wrote:
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today,
if got the following message:
...snip...
I have never encountered this before. Any suggestions?
Try now? Should be fixed.
We were rolling out a new
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:51:53 -0400
Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Kevin Fenzi writes:
http://www.happyassassin.net/2013/06/14/fedora-1920-logfile-explosions/
Did I read this right? /var/log/messages have been replaced by binary
goo?
No, you didn't read it right.
rsyslog
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:51:53 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Did I read this right? /var/log/messages have been replaced by binary goo?
Nah, just the systemd crap which no one wants to read anyway
(I think). I certainly still have a /var/log/messages with lots
of junk in it (in fact, lots of
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
discovered
that fastCGI should allow me (using my fedora user account) to do such thing,
even
Am 14.06.2013 13:21, schrieb Rafnews:
On 14.06.2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 12:35, schrieb Rafnews:
however using my standard fedora user account, Ii still can not
edit/remove/move
files/folders owned by apache user account. while searching on internet i
discovered
Am 14.06.2013 14:33, schrieb Rafnews:
i'm trying to create at home a webserver for testing purposes, having the
same behavior as webhosting companies offers. the purpose behind that it's
to have a representative environment when testing to not have particular
surprises with web
Am 14.06.2013 20:51, schrieb Steven Stern:
On 06/14/2013 01:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Doug wrote:
## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
This line *IS* uncommented by default.
Hmmm... Maybe it's been
Am 14.06.2013 23:10, schrieb Clemens Eisserer:
I am running Fedora 19 + updates-testing and suddenly rsyslogd went crazy,
and is now consuming constantly 120% cpu
(and is also constantly expanding allocated memory).
I first thought it could have something to do with updates I've applied
On 06/14/2013 03:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:36 -0700
Paul Erickson va...@telus.net wrote:
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today,
if got the following message:
...snip...
I have never encountered this before. Any suggestions?
Try now?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:17:06PM -0700, jackson byers wrote:
from:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f17.html
Personal Fedora 17 Installation Guide
by Mauriat Miranda (http://www.mjmwired.net/contact/)
echo 'loginname ALL=(ALL) ALL' /etc/sudoers
Where 'loginname' is
On 06/14/2013 07:55 PM, Paul Erickson wrote:
On 06/14/2013 03:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:36 -0700
Paul Erickson va...@telus.net wrote:
Has yum update broken? For some reason when I went to update today,
if got the following message:
...snip...
I have never
Doug:
In my sudoers, that line
... which is this line:%wheel ALL=(ALL) ALL
is commented out, and should be. You don't want everybody and his
brother to have sudo privileges.
It doesn't need to be. Because no users are in the wheel group unless
you customise things when setting up the
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2013, staticsafe sent:
visudo does some syntax checks to check for errors in the edit.
As well as ensuring that your edits are accepted. It's possible to edit
the file, and thanks to the timing of when you did the edit, and other
things happening on the system,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 14/06/2013 13:29, Reindl Harald a écrit :
However it has been told that FastCGI provide also a performance
increase so, we would like to reach it also :)
Faster than CGI, probably, but nearly nobody use CGI nowadays ;)
ok, fire them really
54 matches
Mail list logo
