On 08.08.2013 17:46, Jon Cosby wrote:
I installed a GeForce 8400 GS graphics card to replace an integrated
chipset and can't even boot to the live CD (F18) or rescue mode now. It
stops with the output
Raw EDID
[rows of hex digits all 0]
Nouveau EI [ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for
On 09.08.2013, David wrote:
Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular
Fedora Community users', sucjh as you, and not for myself? And that I
was asking because so many other Linux distributions already have them.
I already have the latest releases.
Updates usually
Hi all,
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that
takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process.
Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the
rest of the
Hello,
I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics
apparently.
With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
nvidia-settings
nvidia-xconfig
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs
and run:
nvidia-xconfig
Should I do the same again?
Thank.
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200
Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the
graphics apparently.
With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
nvidia-settings
nvidia-xconfig
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs
- Original Message -
From: Marko Vojinovic
Sent: 08/09/13 10:32 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200
Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the
On 09/08/13 09:43, Patrick Dupre wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marko Vojinovic
Sent: 08/09/13 10:32 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200
Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am
9.8.2013 11.05 Georgios Petasis petas...@yahoo.gr wrote:
In general I think it can be done (i.e.:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances),
but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl *
httpd stuff?
I have not attempted it, but I think it should be
Hello,
After:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 161.317]
X.Org X Server 1.14.2
Release Date: 2013-06-25
[ 161.317] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 161.317] Build Operating System: 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64
[ 161.318]
Hi guys,
What's the status of running apache under chroots these days? For
instance, is this guide relevant or accurate
http://www.linux-faqs.info/apache/running-apache-in-chroot-jail ?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 161.317]
snip
[ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013
[ 161.398] Loading extension GLX
[ 161.398] (II)
On 09/08/13 11:22, John Pilkington wrote:
On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 161.317]
snip
[ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013
[
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200
Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Now
yum install kmod-nvidia
gives:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from
Thank John for the suggestion.
I am not sure to answer to your question.
My card ia an ATI Mobility, Radeon x1400 128 MB
I cannot find it in the nvidia list.
Is it too old?
By default, it installs:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19
- Original Message -
From: Marko Vojinovic
Sent: 08/09/13 01:10 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200
Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Now
yum install kmod-nvidia
gives:
Packages skipped because of
On 08/09/13 19:11, Patrick Dupre wrote:
My card ia an ATI Mobility, Radeon x1400 128 MB
Ahhh. A Radeon card is not nVidia
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/2013 03:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking
e2label will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm
playing it safe.
Ideas?
man e2label tune2fs -l /dev/whatever shows
Georgios Petasis pise:
Hi all,
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl
through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application,
something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new
process.
Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes
Hi,
I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM.
How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ?
I tried:
systemctl status libreswan.service
libreswan.service
Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory)
Active: inactive (dead)
regards,
Kevin
--
users mailing list
Hello,
Try:
systemctl status ipsec.service
Rami Rosen
http://ramirose.wix.com/ramirosen
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Wilson wkev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM.
How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ?
I tried:
systemctl status
Hello,
2013/8/9 Zdenek Pytela pyt...@phil.muni.cz:
Yes. You just have multiple Listen lines in your config file and
then you have to restart the httpd.service.
I think the main goal was not just to get Apache to listen to multiple
ports, but to have two entirely separate Apache
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:22:10 +0200
Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia works fine and install:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19
kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE i686 1:319.32-1.fc19
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs
On 08/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
yum remove *-nvidia*
Correction: yum remove \*nvidia\*
Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't
escape them.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 08/09/2013 01:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't escape
them.
Not necessarily, but that is good practice. Bash will pass wildcards along if
there are no matches in the string you type.
--
users mailing list
Hello Joe,
Thank.
Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not
working;
Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated
to fedora 16 and only
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686
nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686
are installed. Thus I guess that it
On 08/09/2013 11:51 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank.
Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not
working;
Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated
to fedora 16 and only
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686
nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686
are
Στις 9/8/2013 18:31, ο/η Reindl Harald έγραψε:
Am 09.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Zdenek Pytela:
Georgios Petasis pise:
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl
through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application,
something that takes some minutes to start when apache
On 09.08.2013 10:03, Georgios Petasis wrote:
Hi all,
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that
takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process.
Is there a way to separate these
On 08.08.2013 22:16, Temlakos wrote:
Everyone:
It's taken me this long to realize what the problem is. But I cannot use
Find-and-replace with LibreOffice anymore. It either tries to replace
everything under the sun with my Replace text, or else it can't find the
search key (typically a
On 08.08.2013 01:37, Ian Malone wrote:
Hi,
Having just changed my phone I've got a lot of backed up messages in
csv format (without the sender name, so I'm going to have to reconcile
it with the separate contacts backup). While there are ways to get tem
onto my new phone I'm not really sure
Am 08.08.2013 21:52, schrieb Mark Haney:
I know this is an easy one, but I can't seem to find the current
correct way to do it. I've got a TB HDD that I need to change the
LABEL on. Currently it's 'LIVE' (it's an old production drive) and I
really want to just remove the label altogether and
Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David:
Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird
17.08?
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird
thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q firefox
firefox-23.0-1.fc18.x86_64
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q xulrunner
Am 08.08.2013 21:34, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David:
Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and
Thunderbird 17.08?
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird
thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64
Am 08.08.2013 21:50, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 3:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* patience * koji * yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update
firefox\* xulrunner\* thunderbird\*
choose one of them :-)
the 'regular user' implicitly chooses option 1
True. But they are not yet 'official' in
Am 08.08.2013 22:56, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora
mostly bad timing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977325
Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora
mostly bad timing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977325
Not to insult anyone but... This same situation happens with each
official
Am 08.08.2013 23:04, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 4:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote:
I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly.
The people doing the packaging and testing aren't
Am 08.08.2013 23:12, schrieb David:
I can not say anything about extensions installed with yum. I use
the official extensions from Mozilla. And they work regardless what
Fedora does.
well, so don't complainif you can't say anything
long before* is laughable in case of FF23
I was using
Am 08.08.2013 23:41, schrieb David:
On 8/8/2013 5:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
who cares in context of the official release?
these are *completly* different binaries with completly different
shared libraries and a different compiler, they have *nothing*
common with distribution packages
Am 09.08.2013 10:03, schrieb Georgios Petasis:
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
apache rivet) which implements a heavy
application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a
new process.
Is there a way to separate these heavy
On 08/08/2013 09:53, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:45:27PM +0800, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
(Zhang Enming) wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed virt-manager in Fedora 19. I have looked into
the /etc/init.d directory but I can't find any init scripts for
libvirt.
Is
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
--
Yours sincerely,
Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Am 09.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Zdenek Pytela:
Georgios Petasis pise:
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl
through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application,
something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new
process.
Is there a way to
Hi,
When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge
called virbr0.
Now that I have installed virt-manager in Fedora 19, it did not create a
network bridge.
So how do I create a network bridge? Is virt-manager supposed to create
a network bridge?
I installed
On 9 August 2013 17:47, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang
Enming) singapore.mr.teo.en.m...@gmail.com wrote:
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
Hi:
Mine are there...
[casep@ip36 ~]$ sudo cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
#
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables
initscripts, you need to install iptables-services and issue 'systemctl
disable firewalld'.
-A
On Friday, August 09, 2013 10:56:16 PM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge
called virbr0.
The bridge is created when you configure and start libvirtd. -A
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com -
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I
don't believe I'm the only one who
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:34:24 +0200
Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
What do people suggest?
Andras Simon szajmi at gmail.com writes:
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
Under about:config , set javascript.enabled to false .
2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার asamad...@myopera.com:
Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control
than a simple manual on/off option any way.
Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better
for me. But that was years ago, noscript may have
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
What do people suggest? The
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 07:21:32 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
On 10/08/2013 06:03, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
Fedora 19 used FirewallD by
2013/8/10, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org:
Andras Simon szajmi at gmail.com writes:
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com:
Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
anyone who used that checkbox really wants.
I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway!
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Sat 10 August 2013 01:44:45 Andras Simon wrote:
2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার asamad...@myopera.com:
Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control
than a simple manual on/off option any way.
Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better
On Friday, August 9, 2013, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com:
Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
anyone who used that checkbox really wants.
I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway!
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com:
On Friday, August 9, 2013, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com:
Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
anyone who used that checkbox really wants.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I
don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on
for websites that absolutely require it.
Prefbar
http://prefbar.mozdev.org
F8 to
2013/8/10, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I
don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on
for websites that absolutely require it.
Am 10.08.2013 01:34, schrieb Andras Simon:
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A
On 10/08/2013 06:03, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables
initscripts, you need to install iptables-services
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but more frustrating is the general attitude all over the software
wold to hide any options because the developers thinking all their
users are idiots and finally the next generation of users *will* be
idiots because
On 07/23/2013 11:03 PM, Roger wrote:
snip After that I tried to upgrade from nouveau to NVIDIA drivers.
/snip
Why?
vdpau and XvMC
When nouveau support them, I'll reconsider. Buts its been years now,
and still no support for them in nouveau.
--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
On 10 August 2013 01:34, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
What do people suggest? The NoScript
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:44:45 +0200,
Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার asamad...@myopera.com:
Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control
than a simple manual on/off option any way.
Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 16:45:02 -0700,
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
anyone who used that checkbox really wants. Makes sense to me.
NoScript isn't as safe in at least some regards. There are some
67 matches
Mail list logo
