389-Directory/1.2.11.15 B2013.238.2155 starting up
Linux 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 10 14:46:43 EST 2014 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I have an object which I am unable to operate on. I try to modify it or delete
it and I get err=1 (Operations Error).
it looks like:
On 24 March 2014 18:16, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 March 2014 08:14, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2014 23:37, Bill Oliver ven...@billoblog.com wrote:
Firefox will only allow one invocation of itself on my machine.
Sometimes, if I invoke the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com wrote:
...
There is no need for separating out admin binaries, user binaries,
local binaries, graphical binaries etc. any more, and hasn't been for
about 2 decades.
What about DRBL (Diskless Remote Boot Linux) and LTSP (Linux
Bill Oliver ven...@billoblog.com writes:
Much of what we consider very important today was considered stupid
when it first came out.
Like?
Well, the automobile, aircraft, and personal computer immediately come
to mind.
Those are good examples. Yet nobody would take away your horse and
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com writes:
On Mar 24, 2014, at 6:45 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
/usr belongs on it`s own partition.
As if no one has ever said that before, and as if it convinced even one
thinking person to change their mind.
Thinking persons do not need to
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com writes:
Partitioning took me about three hours with the installer of F19, with a
very simple setup and not even data to preserve and neither RAID, nor
encryption, and it was only possible after I created the partitions
outside the installer. There was no
Powell, Michael michael_pow...@mentor.com writes:
It doesn`t give you choices. It leaves you in the dark about that it is
somehow
possible to use an non-gui installer and to do a minimal install. It leaves
you
in the dark about what exactly happens when you do the partitioning and
with
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com writes:
Chris Murphy wrote:
Nowadays you may have SSDs which supposedly last longer when not written
much to but mostly read from, so you might put the partitions that can
be read-only on the SSDs and use magnetic disks for things like /var,
/tmp, /home
Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com writes:
Having been able to have /usr on a separate partition was a valuable
feature, which now has gone lost. IMNSHO, ruined by naive, inexperienced
kids (to use the same tone as you did), who were overwhelmed by the
additional complexity supporting this feature
Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com writes:
On 24 March 2014 12:45, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
/usr belongs on it`s own partition. And last time I looked, it would
not be compliant with the FHS not to have what is needed in /bin and
/sbin but to use symlinks instead.
I think that's a very
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com writes:
On Mar 23, 2014, at 3:56 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
There`s nothing weird or exotic about it. I`ve always had /usr on its
own partition until the F17 installer refused that, which it shouldn`t
have.
Old news.
Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com writes:
On 23 March 2014 21:56, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
There`s nothing weird or exotic about it. I`ve always had /usr on its
own partition until the F17 installer refused that, which it shouldn`t
have.
As I have commented elsewhere, I think this is a
Allegedly, on or about 24 March 2014, Peter Arremann sent:
You realize this is a Fedora mailing list, not the real world? :)
Oh the irony...
To spell that out: The number of people using computers, never mind
just the ones on this list, that aren't part of the real world.
--
[tim@localhost
On 03/25/14 13:30, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Usually I'd try with a new profile first, if the problem doesn't
happen there, then I try to track down why it's happening in the
original profile. (i.e. I wasn't implying he just ditches his old
profile :)).
thinking about that, a new profile is just
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 08:19:52PM +0100, lee wrote:
/usr belongs on it`s own partition.
As if no one has ever said that before, and as if it convinced even one
thinking person to change their mind.
Thinking persons do not need to change their minds about it because they
realise that
Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au writes:
I reckon it's the case for most OSs that /most/ users don't really care
much about what they're using, nor how it works. The large number of
clueless people using computers would seem to be evidence of that.
The number of clueless people is also large
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com writes:
On 03/24/2014 09:22 AM, lee wrote:
The ones making packages probably have more influence. Is it
supposed to be like that?
Frankly, yes. Feedback on a list is fine, but anyone can say Hey, I
wish it was more like this:, but ultimately it will
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 08:19:52PM +0100, lee wrote:
/usr belongs on it`s own partition.
As if no one has ever said that before, and as if it convinced even one
thinking person to change their mind.
Thinking persons do not need to change
Colleagues,
Can you verify / clarify for me?
From reading changelogs it appears that tracking the shadowLastChange timestamp
was not introduced until 1.2.11 - is that accurate?
Is writing the timestamp something core server does automatically when the
password is changed or is the client
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:43 +1300, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 25/03/14 13:33, g wrote:
On 03/25/14 06:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 02:24 +0600, g wrote:
your insinuendos do little to help op.
Is that a portmanteau of innuendo and insinuation?
lol.
maybe
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 13:09 +0100, lee wrote:
That means you can have separate mount options, filesystems,
partition
constraints, or whatever. It just doesn't work anymore to have it on
a
network share or (if anyone ever did this!) removable media added
after initial boot.
But it
On 03/25/14 20:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:43 +1300, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 25/03/14 13:33, g wrote:
On 03/25/14 06:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 02:24 +0600, g wrote:
your insinuendos do little to help op.
Is that a portmanteau of innuendo
On 25 March 2014 13:08, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On 03/25/14 13:30, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Usually I'd try with a new profile first, if the problem doesn't
happen there, then I try to track down why it's happening in the
original profile. (i.e. I wasn't implying he just ditches his old
On 22 March 2014 20:05, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Ten years of failure installing Fedora. You should make your own t-shirt.
Yeah, go me.
Actually, no, I don't consider that my job is to do the developers'
work for them. My job, the one I was being paid for, was to advise
On 03/25/14 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/25/14 20:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:43 +1300, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 25/03/14 13:33, g wrote:
On 03/25/14 06:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 02:24 +0600, g wrote:
your insinuendos do little to
On 24 March 2014 16:11, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
These aren't old-fashioned, these are technically out-dated. Makes a huge
difference!
I am not sure it does. I would tend to consider them as 2 sides of the
same coin.
The fact you haven't encountered it doesn't mean there are
Hi,
i'm trying to figure out what is the best approach for files and folders
permissions in case of a shared webserver.
we are 2-3 developers and we have a server on which we installed Fedora
20 as web server for our development testing purpose.
all websites should be stored in
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:09:12PM +0100, lee wrote:
It's important to realize that you *can* have a separate /usr -- it just
really needs to be available at boot time.
The F17 installer wouldn`t let me have it.
Yeah, but F20 installer does. What was the complaint again? :)
That means
On 03/25/2014 02:08 PM, Liam Proven wrote:
On 24 March 2014 16:11, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
These aren't old-fashioned, these are technically out-dated. Makes a huge
difference!
I am not sure it does. I would tend to consider them as 2 sides of the
same coin.
Have a look
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:35:57PM +0100, Rafnews wrote:
i'm trying to figure out what is the best approach for files and
folders permissions in case of a shared webserver.
we are 2-3 developers and we have a server on which we installed
Fedora 20 as web server for our development testing
for me ACL includes the user permissions ?
On 25.03.2014 15:25, Pittigher, Raymond - Exelis wrote:
Or you can try using FACL
-
Ray Pittigher
--Exelis Inc, Clifton NJ
--phone 973-284-2275
--email raymond.pittig...@exelisinc.com
From:
Or you can try using FACL
-
Ray Pittigher
--Exelis Inc, Clifton NJ
--phone 973-284-2275
--email raymond.pittig...@exelisinc.com
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Matthew Miller
On 03/25/14 18:52, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 25 March 2014 13:08, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
thinking about that, a new profile is just about as easy a check
to make as disabling add-ons.
It could be a pref in the profile not just an extension causing the
problem. Or maybe a corrupt
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 07:13 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 08:19:52PM +0100, lee wrote:
/usr belongs on it`s own partition.
As if no one has ever said that before, and as if it convinced even one
thinking person to change their mind.
Thinking persons do not
if your main concern is FTP access to the web, then i would recommend an
FTP server, which allows virtual user-ids, such as pure-ftpd. Then,
you could open a new virtual user-id for each project, each web, and
communicate it to all participants of the project or web.
suomi
On 2014-03-25
On 25 March 2014 18:00, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On 03/25/14 18:52, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 25 March 2014 13:08, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
thinking about that, a new profile is just about as easy a check
to make as disabling add-ons.
It could be a pref in the profile not just
On Mar 25, 2014, at 2:41 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com writes:
Partitioning took me about three hours with the installer of F19, with a
very simple setup and not even data to preserve and neither RAID, nor
encryption, and it was only possible
I`m not an expert with Fedoras installers in any way. This is simply my user
experience. Maybe the user experience the installer provides should be
different.
Your user experience is important, but just because you think it should be one
way doesn't mean the community or developers echo
On 03/25/2014 12:10 PM, Powell, Michael wrote:
I disagree; if a user is presented with the following filesystem choices,
btrfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, JFS, reiser4, reiserFS, and ZFS, and each is presented
equally with a single paragraph describing its benefits, unless the user has
prior knowledge
My concern is not FTP only but also directory access and creation
On 25.03.2014 18:16, fedora wrote:
if your main concern is FTP access to the web, then i would recommend
an FTP server, which allows virtual user-ids, such as pure-ftpd. Then,
you could open a new virtual user-id for each
On 03/25/14 23:17, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 25 March 2014 18:00, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
maybe in your experiences, but mine has been just to rename
users's .mozilla directory and when firefox was called,
firefox created a new .mozilla directory.
A Firefox profile directory is
Hi, now that it seems that a .deb is given for GB, has anyone tested
to create a .rpm ?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/goldbug/files/goldbug-im_DEBIAN/0.9.0.2/
Regards
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 03/25/2014 12:27 PM, g wrote:
in case you are not aware, dead wood means portions of a post
that are not related or reference to what one is replying to.
I'd like to add to that the fact that other poster's signatures,
including anything added by the list software, is always deadwood and
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-03-25/
Fedora is big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This new feature
will highlight interesting happenings in five different areas every
week. It won’t be comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries
with
On 03/26/14 01:43, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/25/2014 12:27 PM, g wrote:
in case you are not aware, dead wood means portions of a post
that are not related or reference to what one is replying to.
I'd like to add to that the fact that other poster's signatures,
including anything added by the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:50:10AM -0700, Howard Howell wrote:
It's important to realize that you *can* have a separate /usr -- it just
really needs to be available at boot time. That means you can have
separate mount options, filesystems, partition constraints, or whatever.
It just
I've seen this, or something similar in the bug track, but I am not
seeing a workaround.
I have a VM running FC20 (on an ESXi 5.5 host). I am using the KDE
environment. It was running great until a couple of days ago All of a
sudden, out of the blue, it rebooted and now comes up and tries to
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 02:36 +0600, g wrote:
and so, be prepared to hear from some gmail and cell phone
users who will deny that such can easily be done, as well
as replying interspersed, therefore they do not. :-)
IN Gmail it's trivially easy. Hint: select the relevant part before
hitting
On 25/03/14 22:29, lee wrote:
Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au writes:
I reckon it's the case for most OSs that /most/ users don't really care
much about what they're using, nor how it works. The large number of
clueless people using computers would seem to be evidence of that.
The number of
Hello, Everyone
The subject line says it all... Anybody try to get this device set
up, then hear about the defective antenna that was apparently shipped
with this device for a while, get the new (correct) antenna shipped to
them and then had any success getting this device working with Fedora
20?
On 03/25/2014 07:09 PM, Roger wrote:
And on it goes!
Fedora and Linux in general is what it is. We are fantastically lucky
that developers and testers donate vast knowledge, time and resources.
We have choice, so many variations.
If I were a developer thinking about improvement, speed,
On 2014-03-23 13:49, Powell, Michael wrote:
Then they need to turn around at once! Leaving users in the dark
about what`s going on makes things more difficult for them. Taking
away choices limits the use of the software to the point where it
eventually becomes unusable.
Good design, clarity,
On 2014-03-25 02:22, lee wrote:
Powell, Michael michael_pow...@mentor.com writes:
It doesn`t give you choices. It leaves you in the dark about that it is somehow
possible to use an non-gui installer and to do a minimal install. It leaves you
in the dark about what exactly happens when you do
On 2014-03-25 13:26, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/25/2014 12:10 PM, Powell, Michael wrote:
I disagree; if a user is presented with the following filesystem
choices, btrfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, JFS, reiser4, reiserFS, and ZFS, and
each is presented equally with a single paragraph describing its
benefits,
On 2014-03-24 08:25, Liam Proven wrote:
On 23 March 2014 21:56, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Installing on a laptop requires encrypted partitions. They can be
stolen too easily.
I have never ever used this and never expect or plan to. I suggest
that your blanket statement is too
55 matches
Mail list logo
