On 4/9/2014 3:30 PM, eoconno...@gmail.com wrote:
I gotta sayI'm so impressed with the way this issue has been
handled by the developers here @ FedoraI've updated all three of
my Fedora boxesand will sleep soundly knowing the vulnerability
has been addressed by the best and brightest
Ahh cool thanks again!
After poking around on bugzilla I found this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923418
Sure enough that was my problem. I didn't put the domain name after the
hostname when I installed this time, so adding hostname.domainname to
/etc/hosts fixed me up.
Thanks
Just to let you know, I run Ubuntu 12.04 and it is very stable on the
T430s. I run Fedora 17/18 on T410 without any issues, but have not tried on
T430s.
Best,
Frank
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Pal, Laszlo (private) wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2014 09:30 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>
>
> H
On 04/09/2014 06:01 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
So this looks like selinux-policy-targeted got removed during the update?
On 04/09/2014 04:21 PM, Sean Darcy wrote:
On 04/08/2014 11:54 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
This usually means there is no /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.*
file.
If you run
On 04/10/14 07:29, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> Ok Ed, that gives me something to investigate, I did enable cifs, don't
> understand how it works but ...
>
> The important thing to me is that the OSX computers can access that.
Welcome.
Also, have a look at "smbtree"
--
Get
On 04/09/2014 03:57 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
On 04/09/2014 01:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:05:28PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
You could try rebuilding from a src rpm from the fixed version in
f19. I would expect that to have a very good chance of building
successfull
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 18:30 -0400, eoconno...@gmail.com wrote:
> I gotta sayI'm so impressed with the way this issue has been
> handled by the developers here @ FedoraI've updated all three of
> my Fedora boxesand will sleep soundly knowing the vulnerability
> has been addressed by the
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:36:39 -0600
patrick korsnick wrote:
> Maybe I'll see if I can find something like truss on linux to see what's
> going on behind the scenes.
That's strace on linux.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad
Thanks for the feedback Tom. Yeah I tried it with and without .emacs and it
was slow either way. Just as a test I booted into a 32 bit f20 install on
the same machine/hard drive and yum updated it and everything worked fine--
nice and fast. The 64 bit install was configured exactly the same way as
On 04/09/14 19:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/10/14 06:10, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Yes I can access it with ssh or sftp but I am curious to know what the file
manager is doing?
Have you configured your server to service Windows clients? More than likely,
it is doing discovery
On 04/09/14 18:44, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > In this box, Fedora 20 XFCE, the file manager, Thunar, displays a
> > location "Network" under which the server appears. I would like to
> > see that from the command line but don't know how.
>
While under cli on your own workstation (not the serve
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:08:10 -0600
patrick korsnick wrote:
> When I yum installed emacs and tried to start it up I noticed
> it's taking much longer than usual.
I don't notice a problem, but I have a highly customized
.emacs file and usually go to a lot of trouble to disable
anything "helpful" tha
Hi all,
I did a fresh F20 x64 install today and yum updated it immediately
afterwards. When I yum installed emacs and tried to start it up I noticed
it's taking much longer than usual. Is anyone else experiencing this
behavior? I've never had this problem before on this box... it's an E5 Xeon
mac
On 04/10/14 06:10, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> Yes I can access it with ssh or sftp but I am curious to know what the file
> manager is doing?
Have you configured your server to service Windows clients? More than likely,
it is doing discovery on the network.
In any event, maybe
On 04/09/2014 01:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:05:28PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
You could try rebuilding from a src rpm from the fixed version in
f19. I would expect that to have a very good chance of building
successfully on f18.
Failing that, modify the f18 RPM
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 18:10 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
>
> On 04/09/14 18:03, Lee wrote:
>
> > > In this box, Fedora 20 XFCE, the file manager, Thunar, displays a
> > location "Network" under which the server appears. I would like to
> > see that from the command line but don
I gotta sayI'm so impressed with the way this issue has been handled by the
developers here @ FedoraI've updated all three of my Fedora boxesand
will sleep soundly knowing the vulnerability has been addressed by the best and
brightest! So a heart felt "Thank You" to the Guys and Gals
On 04/09/14 18:03, Lee wrote:
> In this box, Fedora 20 XFCE, the file manager, Thunar, displays a
location "Network" under which the server appears. I would like to see
that from the command line but don't know how.
I believe you could use ssh/sshd for this purpose.
Yes I can access it wit
On Apr 9, 2014 2:32 PM, "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" <
bobgood...@wildblue.net> wrote:
>
> I have assembled a FreeNAS server connected to my LAN and need to access
it from my Fedora computers.
>
> In this box, Fedora 20 XFCE, the file manager, Thunar, displays a
location "Network" under whic
So this looks like selinux-policy-targeted got removed during the update?
On 04/09/2014 04:21 PM, Sean Darcy wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 11:54 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> This usually means there is no /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.*
>> file.
>>
>> If you run semodule -B Does one get created?
I have assembled a FreeNAS server connected to my LAN and need to access
it from my Fedora computers.
In this box, Fedora 20 XFCE, the file manager, Thunar, displays a
location "Network" under which the server appears. I would like to see
that from the command line but don't know how.
Can so
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:05:28PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> You could try rebuilding from a src rpm from the fixed version in
> f19. I would expect that to have a very good chance of building
> successfully on f18.
Failing that, modify the f18 RPM to build with -DOPENSSL_NO_HEARTBEATS
--
On 04/08/2014 11:54 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
This usually means there is no /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.* file.
If you run semodule -B Does one get created?
On 04/08/2014 10:59 AM, Sean Darcy wrote:
Trying to upgrade F19 to F20 using fedup. On the upgrade reboot it hangs:
...
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:52:49 -0700,
Dan Thurman wrote:
I know that F18 is EOL & vulnerable, so
can I backport OpenSSL with a fix? I am'
not ready to upgrade at this time...
You could try rebuilding from a src rpm from the fixed version in f19. I would
expect that to have a very good cha
On 09.04.2014 17:12, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 16:22:11 +0200,
>poma wrote:
>>
>> I wonder who ever approved this, if it is.
>> Breaking the boot, bad medicine.
>
> It doesn't effect most people.
>
You deal with the statistics? :)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@
On 04/08/2014 02:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
See also http://heartbleed.com/ and
http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/04/critical-crypto-bug-in-openssl-opens-two-thirds-of-the-web-to-eavesdropping/
This is potentially very serious and can c
Quoting Tim :
Allegedly, on or about 08 April 2014, Jonathan Ryshpan sent:
It's an interesting question why Net infrastructure code continues to
be written in C, a language that provides no automatic checks for
buffer overflow, which (if I understand right) is the opening for this
security brea
On 04/09/2014 06:19 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 08 April 2014, Jonathan Ryshpan sent:
It's an interesting question why Net infrastructure code continues to
be written in C, a language that provides no automatic checks for
buffer overflow, which (if I understand right) is the opening fo
On 9 April 2014 18:05, Liam Proven wrote:
> I was just ranting about this /right before/ the Heartbleed thing became
> public:
But Gmail didn't want me to paste the link, which is:
http://liam-on-linux.livejournal.com/42285.html
--
Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profil
On 9 April 2014 17:19, Tim wrote:
> Only the other day I was thinking similarly: That almost every exploit
> that I read about, over the last umpteen years, was a buffer overflow;
> and why is it so? Are programmers such morons that they accept all data
> without care, rather than only accept wh
Allegedly, on or about 08 April 2014, Jonathan Ryshpan sent:
> It's an interesting question why Net infrastructure code continues to
> be written in C, a language that provides no automatic checks for
> buffer overflow, which (if I understand right) is the opening for this
> security breach, along
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 16:35 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> And whatever language you use, people can still create unreadable
> spaghetti-code ;-)
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any
programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 16:22:11 +0200,
poma wrote:
I wonder who ever approved this, if it is.
Breaking the boot, bad medicine.
It doesn't effect most people.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 04/09/2014 07:40 AM, Rafnews wrote:
On 09.04.2014 16:32, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:28 AM, Rafnews wrote:
But the problem happened just after following this tutorial how to
install nvidia drivers...
so problem comes from a step there, as for 2 weeks everything worked
well.
Just beca
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of g
Sent: woensdag 9 april 2014 9:19
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Coding Practice [was Re: Serious OpenSSL vulnerability]
On 04/09/14 11:35, Jonatha
On 09.04.2014 16:32, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:28 AM, Rafnews wrote:
But the problem happened just after following this tutorial how to
install nvidia drivers...
so problem comes from a step there, as for 2 weeks everything worked
well.
Just because things broke shortly after you inst
On 04/09/2014 07:28 AM, Rafnews wrote:
But the problem happened just after following this tutorial how to
install nvidia drivers...
so problem comes from a step there, as for 2 weeks everything worked well.
Just because things broke shortly after you installed the drivers
doesn't mean they're
On 09.04.2014 16:22, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/09/2014 06:23 AM, Rafnews wrote:
and now when it loads Fedora, it stops at different steps:
1. Starting Network Manager Script Dispatcher Service
or
2. Started Hostname Service
or
3. ASAHI mDNS/DNS-SD Stack
Unless there's a reason that any of these
I just discovered the ns-activate/inactivate/accountstatus.pl scripts but
I can't seem to get them to work. I've tried a bunch of different
combinations along these lines --
s-accountstatus.pl -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w password -p 389 -h
myldapserver -I cn=ejtest,ou=Deactivated
Accts,ou=People
On 04/09/2014 06:23 AM, Rafnews wrote:
and now when it loads Fedora, it stops at different steps:
1. Starting Network Manager Script Dispatcher Service
or
2. Started Hostname Service
or
3. ASAHI mDNS/DNS-SD Stack
Unless there's a reason that any of these services depend on your video
driver, t
On 09.04.2014 15:40, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 15:07:07 +0200,
>poma wrote:
>> On 09.04.2014 12:08, poma wrote:
>>> dracut-037-10.git20140402.fc20.x86_64 generates broken vmlinuzes for the
>>> RAID setups.
>>> System is U.N.B.0.0.T.A.B.L.E!
>>> Harald, whuz goin'
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Pal, Laszlo (private) wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2014 09:30 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>Is it at all possible to run Fedora on a Lenovo ThinkPad T430 without
> crashing three to five times per day? Has any one been able to do this?
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 15:07:07 +0200,
poma wrote:
On 09.04.2014 12:08, poma wrote:
dracut-037-10.git20140402.fc20.x86_64 generates broken vmlinuzes for the
RAID setups.
System is U.N.B.0.0.T.A.B.L.E!
Harald, whuz goin' on?! :)
037-10.git20140402.fc20 hangs on mirrored/lvm root di
Hi,
after i followed the tutorial from
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2014/fedora-20-nvidia-guide/ about
installing nVidia driver for my ASUS G73SW laptop (with a GTX460M nvidia
card), i'm getting blocked at boot time of fedora 20.
i used this configuration (without nvidia driver) for 2
On 09.04.2014 12:08, poma wrote:
> dracut-037-10.git20140402.fc20.x86_64 generates broken vmlinuzes for the
> RAID setups.
> System is U.N.B.0.0.T.A.B.L.E!
> Harald, whuz goin' on?! :)
>
037-10.git20140402.fc20 hangs on mirrored/lvm root disk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:35:24PM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:55 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
> >
> > See also http://heartbleed.com/ and
> > http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/04/critical-crypto-bug-in-open
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:33 AM, CS_DBA wrote:
>
> Running F20 and KDE, updated libre office. Now if I open by clicking on libre
> office writer I get a window outline with the background from my desktop in
> the window, it's not quite a transparent window cause if I move it the
> portion of th
dracut-037-10.git20140402.fc20.x86_64 generates broken vmlinuzes for the
RAID setups.
System is U.N.B.0.0.T.A.B.L.E!
Harald, whuz goin' on?! :)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
2014-04-08 15:57 GMT+01:00 Tim :
> Allegedly, on or about 08 April 2014, Pedro Francisco sent:
>> a) where does GDM store its monitor settings?
>
> "locate monitors.xml" as the root user, so you can find all instances of
> it on your hard drive.
Thanks :)
Didn't work though. Opened bug #1085566 @
On 9 April 2014 06:35, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:55 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
>>
>> See also http://heartbleed.com/ and
>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/04/critical-crypto-bug-in-openssl-opens-two-thirds-of
On 04/09/14 11:35, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
<<>>
It's an interesting question why Net infrastructure code
> continues to be written in C, a language that provides no
> automatic checks for buffer overflow, which (if I understand
> right) is the opening for this security breach, along with so
>
51 matches
Mail list logo
