Hi,
We are currently using 389-DS as a LDAP server for our university
(University Politehnica from Bucharest). Right now we have about 35000
accounts created into the 389-DS. We need to synchronize all the
accounts with an Active Directory server for various purposes (Wifi
authentication/e-mail
On 07/22/2014 04:05 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hi,
We are currently using 389-DS as a LDAP server for our university
(University Politehnica from Bucharest). Right now we have about 35000
accounts created into the 389-DS. We need to synchronize all the
accounts with an Active Directory server for
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/22/2014 04:05 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hi,
We are currently using 389-DS as a LDAP server for our university
(University Politehnica from Bucharest). Right now we have about 35000
accounts created into the
On 07/22/2014 07:56 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/22/2014 04:05 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hi,
We are currently using 389-DS as a LDAP server for our university
(University Politehnica from Bucharest). Right now we have
I don't think it is possible to solve this problem currently. Please file a
ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/389/newticket
I opened a ticket [1]
Thanks,
Mihai
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47864
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello List,
I would like to know if DS can be cfg for TLS/SSL + CA connections
later one or must to be done at installation time ?
Isabella
--
-
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
On 07/22/2014 03:17 PM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
Hello List,
I would like to know if DS can be cfg for TLS/SSL + CA connections
later one or must to be done at installation time ?
Later on. Set up without TLS/SSL, then configure later.
Thank you Jatin.
I knew 'most' would work.
It is able to display colours as well.
But I am used to 'less' and its key bindings.
I am quite puzzled as why the termcap settings for less don't work in
Fedora20.
Do you have any explanations??
Just a few hours ago I installed CentOS 7 and it
On 21.07.2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
what is it I am symlinking?? the actual kernel??
If you need to: the root directory of the kernel source.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 22.07.2014, Joe Zeff wrote:
If you really need to put it on a spare partition, you can always move
everything there from /usr/src and then mount that partition at /usr/src and
go from there.
And don't forget to take a look into /lib/modules and update the
(now) incorrect symlinks to the
Hi Amila,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:42:23PM +0530, Amila Perera wrote:
man()
{
env LESS_TERMCAP_mb=$'\E[01;31m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_md=$'\E[01;34m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_me=$'\E[0m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_se=$'\E[0m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_so=$'\E[01;33;40m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_ue=$'\E[0m' \
On 07/22/2014 09:10 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Amila,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:42:23PM +0530, Amila Perera wrote:
man()
{
env LESS_TERMCAP_mb=$'\E[01;31m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_md=$'\E[01;34m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_me=$'\E[0m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_se=$'\E[0m' \
LESS_TERMCAP_so=$'\E[01;33;40m' \
Thank you for your feedback.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried with bash, it seems to work ... somewhat. I see a yellow status
at the bottom, but otherwise I see a regular man page. When I `type
man' after defining your function, I get
On Jul 22 13:37, Amila Perera wrote:
Thank you for your feedback.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried with bash, it seems to work ... somewhat. I see a yellow status
at the bottom, but otherwise I see a regular man page. When I
Thanks a lot Corinna.
The following setting did the trick for me.
Now the output on Ubuntu Fedora looks the same.
Thank you once again.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Corinna Vinschen fed...@cygwin.de wrote:
Try this additionally to setting the LESS_TERMCAP_xx vars:
export
On 22/07/14 02:39, Peter Skensved wrote:
I've been using NFSv4 extensively for several years and I've not had an issue
that you
describe where everything is fine and then suddenly performance goes to hell in
a hand basket.
It sounds as if you only have 2 systems to work with? No, tiebreaker
On Jul 22 14:43, Amila Perera wrote:
Thanks a lot Corinna.
The following setting did the trick for me.
Now the output on Ubuntu Fedora looks the same.
Thank you once again.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Corinna Vinschen fed...@cygwin.de wrote:
Try this additionally to setting
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen fed...@cygwin.de wrote:
$ man -Hlynx less
It's the first time I ever used such thing.
It looks quite good, especially the hyperlinks etc.
Thank you for the information
--
*Amila Perera.*
--
users mailing list
On 21/07/14 21:27, Ed Greshko wrote:
For all intents and purpose it looks like its working as it should, it's just
painfully slow.
Any NFS gurus out there, that can tell me what I'm doing wrong?
I've been using NFSv4 extensively for several years and I've not had an issue
that you describe
On 21/07/14 20:14, Tom Horsley wrote:
Any NFS gurus out there, that can tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Not a useful answer, I'm afraid:
In my experience, the fundamental problem is caused by using NFS.
With all the folks re-writing things that don't need to be replaced,
I really wonder why
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com
wrote:
is there some command I don't know about that will let you swap to the
latest kernel without rebooting?
What problems one could face if I were to not reboot my system for a while
and let it update a few kernel
Why doesn't system respect FSH? What is its benefit?
Cite man 7 hier
..
/usr/lib
Object libraries, including dynamic libraries, plus some
executables which usually are not invoked directly. More complicated
pro‐
grams may have whole subdirectories there.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:56:00 +0530
Sudhir Khanger sud...@sudhirkhanger.com wrote:
What problems one could face if I were to not reboot my system for a
while and let it update a few kernel versions?
Well, for example, a kernel update might be due to some new severe
security exploit, and the
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:26:57 +0100
Balint Szigeti balint.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't system respect FSH? What is its benefit?
[snip]
I think, the config files should store in /etc instead of everywhere
else. The chroot applications are exceptions. It cause we MUST
mount /usr in / (root)
On 07/22/2014 02:42 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Whether this is FSH-compliant or not, I don't know. Some people say it
is, some people say it is not, most of the people don't really care. :-)
The difference is:
Files outside of /etc are not supposed to modified by users or admins.
I.e.
Hello,
Is it normal that /usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroublehootd -f (2 shells)
consumes 8 GO of RAM (i.e. 49% and 46% of the total)?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr is
broken by design.
pls don't start it.
I could find anything else. The only reason I've found systemd because I
worked with it nowadays.
--
users
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 13:25 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
In theory, for each kernel update you could look at the changelog to
see what was actually updated and why, and then decide if you need to
run the updated kernel or not. But most people typically don't want to
invest the time and effort
On 07/22/2014 12:16 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 12:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have considerable routing and addressing knowledge. Besides being
one of the authors of rfc 1918, and worked on CIDR, here at IETF I
contribute to ipv6ops and ipv6man.
Sorry, didn't mean to impune
On 07/22/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/21/14 22:55, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking to put a
direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets would use the zeroconf
(169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then use
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
adapter.
Well, ip link will/should give a list of links.
I use network-manager, as I have no
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
adapter.
Well, ip link will/should give a list of
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
adapter.
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even when
connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this situation and auto
configure itself using standard cables.
--
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this
situation and auto
On 07/22/14 22:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now
On 07/22/2014 10:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even when
connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this situation and auto
On 07/22/14 22:43, poma wrote:
file /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: symbolic link to
`/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf'
# cat /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf
[main]
plugins=keyfile
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ file
On 07/22/14 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do you have access to the system to use the GUI tools of network manager?
(I'm assuming you are using nm).
I cannot see anyplace to specify use zeroconf if no dhcp.
This is gnome3 on F20...
I don't regularly use gnome. KDE is my preferred
On 07/22/2014 10:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
On 07/22/2014 10:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do you have access to the system to use the GUI tools of network manager?
(I'm assuming you are using nm).
I cannot see anyplace to specify use zeroconf if no dhcp.
This is gnome3 on F20...
I
On 07/22/2014 10:43 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now?
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use
it. This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you could have a fall back position.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now?
On 22.07.2014 16:57, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:43 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz
On 07/22/2014 10:49 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:43, poma wrote:
file /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: symbolic link to
`/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf'
# cat /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf
[main]
On 07/22/2014 10:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use it.
This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you could have a fall back position.
This is what
On 22.07.2014 17:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On
OK. New day, new testing. I can get IPv4 setup quickly and routing
right. Yeah me (with a little help from my friends I got by)!
So I go to start vncserver where I was up to yesterday where I got the
display wrong and get:
# systemctl start vncserver@:3.service
Job for
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:03:39 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
Agreed, but I don't seem to fully understand your point
On 07/22/14 23:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use
it. This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you
On 07/22/2014 01:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 23:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use it.
This option does not seem to be
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with mechanisms to add their respective
native packages under
Hi, thanks for help,
I installed a color profile for my LCD monitor.
Where did it come from?
I measured it with a colorimeter using argyllcms.
What do you get for?
colormgr get-devices
...
Object Path:
/org/freedesktop/ColorManager/devices/xrandr_Chi_Mei_Optoelectronics_corp__fred_1000
Hi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Anders Wegge Kelle wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with mechanisms
On 07/22/2014 12:26 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with
Hello,
I have 2 machines running fedora 20, one from 2007 with a dual processor
and 3 Go, and a recent one (2013) with a quad processor an 8 Go.
But it is a lot more convenient to use the old machine!!!
The recent one is always busy, 4 processors running
53.1 55.9 /usr/bin/python -Es
On 07/23/14 01:41, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
If I go back far enough with my linux testing, I remember zeroconf working.
Or at least I think so; am going back quite a while. Probably before adding
avahi.
Now that you mention it, you are most probably right. I recall there always
being a
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us writes:
On 07/22/2014 12:26 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
On 07/23/14 01:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
OK. New day, new testing. I can get IPv4 setup quickly and routing right.
Yeah me (with a little help from my friends I got by)!
So I go to start vncserver where I was up to yesterday where I got the
display wrong and get:
# systemctl start
I don't know, and don't want to know what Flock is and I don't want to
register for it. Please UNSUBSCRIBE me!
Who wouldn't want to go to Flock?
--
Steven Rosenberg
http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog
http://blogs.dailynews.com/click
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 22 Jul 2014 at 13:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:02:02 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
To: Community support for Fedora users
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:vncserver not
On 07/22/2014 01:23 PM, Patrick Dupre issued this missive:
Hello,
I have 2 machines running fedora 20, one from 2007 with a dual processor
and 3 Go, and a recent one (2013) with a quad processor an 8 Go.
But it is a lot more convenient to use the old machine!!!
The recent one is always busy, 4
Couple of things seem to have gone awry.
I think Ubuntu update to 14.04 has messed around with Fedora 20 grub
boot because booting now takes for ever and defaults to Ctrl D to
Continue or root password for maintenance, then takes 30-50 seconds to boot.
2nd, With the latest updates and
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Roger are...@bigpond.com wrote:
Couple of things seem to have gone awry.
I think Ubuntu update to 14.04 has messed around with Fedora 20 grub boot
because booting now takes for ever and defaults to Ctrl D to Continue or
root password for maintenance, then
On 07/22/14 04:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 22 13:37, Amila Perera wrote:
Thank you for your feedback.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried with bash, it seems to work ... somewhat. I see a yellow status
at the bottom, but
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 12:14 PM, Amila Perera wrote:
Thank you Jatin.
I knew 'most' would work.
It is able to display colours as well.
But I am used to 'less' and its key bindings.
I am quite puzzled as why the termcap settings for less don't work in
Fedora20.
Do you have any
On 07/22/2014 06:55 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014 at 13:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:02:02 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
To: Community support for Fedora users
OK. I believe I figured out what is wrongish.
I normally run gnome, so in my ~/.vnc/xstartup I have:
exec gnome-session
as the last line. But this fedora 20 arm system is running Xfce! So
after a quick google search, I changed that to:
exec xfce4-session
But still I get vnc having a
72 matches
Mail list logo
