389 Directory Server 1.3.2.23
The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base version
1.3.2.23.
Fedora packages are available from the Fedora 20 and Rawhide repositories.
The new packages and versions are:
* 389-ds-base-1.3.2.23-1
A source tarball is available for
Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals.
Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20.
Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month
intervals, or is the long interval for Fedora 21 only (or whatever)?
Will Fedora 20 be
On Wednesday 27 August 2014 18:46:26 Brian Johnson wrote:
Hello all,
I was recently gifted an old Dell Latitude E6400 laptop and, given its age
and what I've read, I thought getting Fedora 20 going on it would be
smooth.
And, to some extent, it was. I was primarily concerned with the
On 08/26/14 19:33, Roger Heflin wrote:
I had to go find the CD I had with dicom files on it.
I was not able to get anything selecting the diacomdir file...I had to
go into dicom dir and go down to where there were real files (select
show all files) and then was able to display the image by
On 28 August 2014 09:34, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
On 08/26/14 19:33, Roger Heflin wrote:
I had to go find the CD I had with dicom files on it.
I was not able to get anything selecting the diacomdir file...I had to
go into dicom dir and go down to
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all.
Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider,
itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a
toothpick into the glue, and use that to put a dot on the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:02:44AM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 06:31:23 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
It will come back
Again see the problem exist in unstable version and if it does file a bug.
That is the best possible solution.
If the GNOME solution I already
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:48:06 -0700
Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.net wrote:
Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month intervals.
Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months after Fedora 20.
Is the intention to schedule future releases at roughly 12 month
hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been
compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose? if it is
something that poses a large concern is it possible to change the
encryption method from md5 to crypt? or another method that is not
compromised?
Hi!
I tried to set up a system using four 3TB disks as a raid6. The disks
are new, no old partitions laying around. I used a USB stick as install
media (Fedora 20 x86_64 Gnome Live).
I chose manual partitioning to get everything as I wanted. When this was
ready I got the error message that
On 08/28/2014 10:48 AM, Lars E. Pettersson issued this missive:
Hi!
I tried to set up a system using four 3TB disks as a raid6. The disks
are new, no old partitions laying around. I used a USB stick as install
media (Fedora 20 x86_64 Gnome Live).
I chose manual partitioning to get everything
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:10:54 -0700,
Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote:
I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and
with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder
as your RAID, and let the system put the boot partition in that reserved
On 08/28/14 20:21, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:10:54 -0700,
Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote:
I think you need to reserve some small space on all the drives (and
with 3TB drives you can afford to sacrifice a few MB), use the remainder
as your RAID, and let the
On 28.08.2014, dustin kempter wrote:
hi all, I just had a question. so I have been hearing that md5 has been
compromised, how much of a security threat does this impose?
MD5 is not used for encryption. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5
for further details and for what md5 actually is.
Note my day job IS data communications and security. I am NOT a
cryptographer. I am in a different select group that often refer to
ourselves as the crypto-plumbers. We know how to carefully use the
crypto blocks to build whole systems.
On 08/28/2014 11:34 AM, dustin kempter wrote:
hi all,
On 08/28/2014 06:32 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 August 2014, jd1008 sent:
It is electro-mechanical. No opticals involved at all.
Then try putting a tiny dot of superglue put on top of the slider,
itself, just to make that part of the card a bit bigger. Poke a
toothpick into the
This is on a F20 arm system. It SHOULD follow F20 rules...
first: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# Added by 'write_udev' for detected device 'eth0'.
SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, DRIVERS==?*,
ATTR{address}==02:67:15:00:01:78, NAME=eth0
First IP address is:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include
IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file
rather than creating a eth0:0 file (at least that worked
On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
DEVICE=eth0:0
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
NAME=System eth0
MTU=1500
GATEWAY=208.83.67.161
IPADDR=208.83.67.164
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
I think you need to add
ONPARENT=yes
to make it start
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 15:29:58 -0400,
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Today you might STILL use sha1; it has had tremendous resiliency. NIST
was expecting it to fall as badly as md5 by this point. Most use at
least sha256, and sha3 is now out there. Choose your poison.
On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include
IPADDR2=, NETMASK2=, etc. in the one ifcfg-eth0 file
rather
On 08/28/2014 04:35 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
DEVICE=eth0:0
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
NAME=System eth0
MTU=1500
GATEWAY=208.83.67.161
IPADDR=208.83.67.164
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
I
29 aug 2014 kl. 00:12 skrev Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change.
:(
Ok. Another difference I see is that my interface is named :1, i.e. in my case
wan:1 Not sure if that makes any difference though, was years since I set this
up :)
Lars
--
users
On 08/28/2014 06:23 PM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
29 aug 2014 kl. 00:12 skrev Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
Add this to ifcfg-eth0:0 and no change.
:(
Ok. Another difference I see is that my interface is named :1, i.e. in my case
wan:1 Not sure if that makes any difference though,
On 08/29/14 06:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you are supposed to include
IPADDR2=,
On 08/29/14 07:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
And from a second system
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ ping 192.168.1.19
PING 192.168.1.19 (192.168.1.19) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.337 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.290 ms
64 bytes
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:20:18 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
You may be getting confused by using ifconfig.
Yea, I forgot that bit, my aliases didn't show up
in ifconfig, but I could ping them from another
computer on the same network.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 08/28/2014 07:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/29/14 06:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:55 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So what is missing? Do I need a 70-persistent-net.rules for eth0:0 ??
These days, I'm pretty sure you
It is all ifconfigs fault :)
I just assumed that in f20 it was still good enough until F21.
# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# Added by 'write_udev' for detected device 'eth0'.
SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, DRIVERS==?*,
ATTR{address}==02:67:15:00:01:78, NAME=eth0
# cat
On 08/28/2014 01:48 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month
intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months
after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule future releases at
roughly 12 month intervals, or is the long interval
Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release schedule,
the number of bugs has been higher.
I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all
the bugs
of a new release every 6 months.
Simply put, not enough dedicated and SAVVY testers of kernel subsystems
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600
jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release
schedule, the number of bugs has been higher.
I think it is impossible to perform thorough testing and iron out all
the bugs
of a new release every 6 months.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600 jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/28/2014 01:48 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Up to Fedora 21, releases have occurred at roughly 6 month
intervals. Fedora 21 is scheduled to be released about 11 months
after Fedora 20. Is the intention to schedule
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:27:44 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:44:41 -0600
jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems that ever since fedora switched to every 6 months release
schedule, the number of bugs has been higher.
I think it is impossible to perform
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
On 08/28/14 22:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0
[snipped]
ONBOOT=yes
I think you need to add
ONPARENT=yes
to make it start when its parent does.
ONPARENT=yes is indeed
On 29 Aug 2014 01:32, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
you are right. ifconfig USE to be able to do this, but now it is just a
shell? over ip and so...
Your memory isn't quite accurate... ifconfig has never handled multiple IP
addresses on an interface with aliases being used to
36 matches
Mail list logo
