Hi Folks,
We are trying to move our database from the much older 1.1.2 version to
1.2.11 on a Centos 6 platform. When trying to initialize the 1.2.11
database with a ldif file exported from the older database I am getting
tons of syntax violations. The schema (99user.ldif + dse.ldif extensions)
Hi, folks
We've been really pleased with our 389 servers, which have been successfully
running as a multi-master pair in production for 7 weeks, following (elapsed)
months of development.
Unfortunately, in the last few days their performance has radically degraded to
the point where they are
[15/Nov/2014:03:58:43 +0100] - replica_generate_next_csn:
opcsn=5466c1640001 = basecsn=5466c1640002, adjusted
opcsn=5466c16400010001
[15/Nov/2014:10:38:38 +0100] - replica_generate_next_csn:
opcsn=54671f1f0001 = basecsn=54671f1f0003, adjusted
On Sunday 16 November 2014 22:03:51 jd1008 wrote:
Gary, did you take a look at driver for all all broadcom b43xxx ???
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43
I'll check again but I believe this is a new chipset and not yet supported
--
users mailing list
On 17.11.2014, Gary Stainburn wrote:
I'll check again but I believe this is a new chipset and not yet supported
You could also grep for BCM4352 in the latest kernel sourcetree.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Monday 17 November 2014 10:39:20 Heinz Diehl wrote:
You could also grep for BCM4352 in the latest kernel sourcetree.
What would that give me?
I'm certainly not up to kernel hacking, that's beyond my abilities.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
Onwards and upwards. I'm going for a micro USB WIFI adaptor to fix my wireless
problem so I'm now moving onto my touchpad.
The problem I have is that unlike traditional touch pads the left and right
mouse buttons on this laptop are part of the touch pad itself. The problem
I'm experiencing
Tim:
There have been cases of people getting refurbished drives which did
have the previous owners data on them.
Ed Greshko:
Do you have first hand knowledge of this or is this something you've
just heard about?
I read about it on the internet, so it must be true... ;-) But
seriously, I
Hi Gary
i own an HP EliteBook with similar touchpad as you describe. I followed
the instructions in
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Touchpad_Synaptics
but was only partially happy, to say the least:
1. single tap as click left mouse button works practically always
2. two finder scroll
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/17/14 12:58, Tim wrote:
There have been cases of people getting refurbished drives which did
have the previous owners data on them.
Do you have first hand knowledge of this or is this something you've just heard
about?
The reason I ask this is I
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, fedora wrote:
Hi Gary
i own an HP EliteBook with similar touchpad as you describe. I followed the
instructions in
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Touchpad_Synaptics
but was only partially happy, to say the least:
1. single tap as click left mouse button works
On 11/17/2014 7:30 AM, Bill Oliver wrote:
[snip]
I'm thinking about replacing my aging laptop. I remember a few years
ago that there were some places that listed what laptops were and were
not linux-friendly.
Is there a good site that lists the degree of fedora-friendliness for
On 11/16/2014 09:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:04 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com
mailto:jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Before sending the drive for warranty service, what is the best
way to clean the unallocated blocks?
If this is really important to you, just eat the cost of
On 11/16/2014 09:58 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 22:17 -0600, g wrote:
hard disk drive manufactures _are_not_ NSA. you _are_not_ NSA.
they do not connect hdd's to computers and try to read drives to
see what is on them. to do so is a waist of their time.
There have been cases of
On 11/17/2014 03:45 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2014 10:39:20 Heinz Diehl wrote:
You could also grep for BCM4352 in the latest kernel sourcetree.
What would that give me?
I'm certainly not up to kernel hacking, that's beyond my abilities.
It is not hacking.
Just a
Man page says:
...
fdatasync
physically write output file data before finishing
fsync likewise, but also write metadata
There is no explanation about this, as dd is supposed to be agnostic
about the type of the data.
If a disk is being dd'ed out to a file and
On 17.11.2014 19:46, jd1008 wrote:
On 11/17/2014 03:45 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2014 10:39:20 Heinz Diehl wrote:
You could also grep for BCM4352 in the latest kernel sourcetree.
What would that give me?
I'm certainly not up to kernel hacking, that's beyond my
On 11/17/2014 11:28 AM, jd1008 issued this missive:
Man page says:
...
fdatasync
physically write output file data before finishing
fsync likewise, but also write metadata
There is no explanation about this, as dd is supposed to be agnostic
about the
El sáb, 15-11-2014 a las 08:53 -0500, Sam Varshavchik escribió:
Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with a
subject that's typically a variation of Just for yucks, and giggles is a
link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching to systemd; in one,
huge
On 17Nov2014 13:22, Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com wrote:
On 11/17/2014 11:28 AM, jd1008 issued this missive:
Man page says:
...
fdatasync
physically write output file data before finishing
fsync likewise, but also write metadata
There is no explanation about
Once upon a time, Juan Orti juan.o...@miceliux.com said:
systemd-resolved is a daemon for resolving DNS. What's wrong about
caching? All DNS servers perform caching.
It's like if you have unbound at 127.0.0.1 as local resolver, that's a
very common setup.
Well, that's the point. We already
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Juan Orti juan.o...@miceliux.com said:
systemd-resolved is a daemon for resolving DNS. What's wrong about
caching? All DNS servers perform caching.
It's like if you have unbound at 127.0.0.1 as local
Hi
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Why did the systemd
project add this to the scope of the project for a system and service
manager for Linux?
This was something that could have been easily asked to systemd developers
rather than the long rant that was posted. In
On 11/17/2014 06:54 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adamswrote:
Why did the systemd
project add this to the scope of the project for a system and service
manager for Linux?
This was something that could have been easily asked to systemd
Rahul Sundaram writes:
Hi
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Why did the systemd
project add this to the scope of the project for a system and service
manager for Linux?
This was something that could have been easily asked to systemd developers
rather than
Hi
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Right. Like systemd developers have such an established track record of
listening to feedback from the community,
That has no connection to what I said. If you have already made up your
mind, that's fine but if you are wondering why
You can put this in your ~/.bashrc:
export http_proxy=http://127.0.0.1:3128;
export ftp_proxy=ftp://127.0.0.1:3128;
I'm not sure how many utilities use it but I think wget does.
Bill
On 11/16/2014 8:18 AM, Alexis Jeandet wrote:
Le 15/11/2014 07:17, Tim a écrit :
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:55
27 matches
Mail list logo
