Hi Everyboy,
Did someone already face to this issue:
After a fresh install of 389ds on centos 6.5:
The dirsrv start successfully
But the admin console failed with that error:
Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/admserv.conf:
Invalid command 'AdminDomain:', perhaps misspelled or
Is there a way to permanently disable SSLv3 in directory server? If I
modify the dse.ldif file and set nssSSL3 to off this works until an admin
goes through the gui and makes a change to the encryption cert and saves
config. Once this happens SSLv3 is enabled again.
--
389 users mailing list
On 12/29/14 13:11, Neal Becker wrote:
114:[20.255] (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled
115:[20.255] (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled
116:[20.255] (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled
117:[20.255] (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled
118:[20.255] (EE) [drm] KMS not enabled
A hunch,
On 29.12.2014, Andre Robatino wrote:
I have mozilla-adblockplus-2.6.6-1 installed in F21 (was just pushed stable
in F19, F20, and F21). Firefox's Add-ons/Extensions still shows
2.6.4.
My firefox shows the correct version. A quick grep into the
Fedora 21 adblockplus src.rpm does not reveal
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 12:57 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Firefox 34.0 in an updated Fedora-21 64 bit XFCE etc.
Here, Firefox 34.0 on up to date Fedora 20.
The uname -rsvp in my signatures (I couldn't resist putting the options
in that order) is a script that always shows the specs of whatever
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 23:37:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And it is installed on the system. Or it seems so:
# java -version
openjdk version 1.8.0_25
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_25-b18)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.25-b02, mixed mode)
So what is Firefoxes
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 18:13 +0100, antonio wrote:
if this behaviour is connected to hidden SSID
You're only hurting yourself by hiding it. Seriously, hiding it doesn't
do you *any* good.
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.17.7-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 04:08:31 UTC 2014 i686
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 16:09 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
Firefox's Add-ons/Extensions still shows 2.6.4, even after quitting
and restarting Firefox, and removing and reinstalling
mozilla-adblockplus.
I shall ask the obvious question: Did you completely quit Firefox so
that there were no other
Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au writes:
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 16:09 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
Firefox's Add-ons/Extensions still shows 2.6.4, even after quitting
and restarting Firefox, and removing and reinstalling
mozilla-adblockplus.
I shall ask the obvious question: Did you
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a ? is the correct behaviour in the case of there being
hidden SSIDs?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Tim
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:10:58 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
ssh -v nbecker7
...
Authenticated to nbecker7 ([10.32.112.225]:22).
debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
debug1: Requesting no-more-sessi...@openssh.com
...
What is that??
$ rpm -qd openssh
/usr/share/doc/openssh/CREDITS
Search engines are your friend. From the release notes:
Added a no-more-sessi...@openssh.com global request extension that is
sent from ssh(1) to sshd(8) when the client knows that it will never
request another session (i.e. when session multiplexing is disabled).
This allows a server to
On my server, after updating f20-f21, shell startup is _extremely_ slow.
Using strace, it appears that the problem is dbus
08:22:57 connect(5, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL,
sun_path=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket}, 33) = 0
...
08:22:57 recvmsg(5, 0x7fff640c3970, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
On 12/30/2014 06:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 23:37:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And it is installed on the system. Or it seems so:
# java -version
openjdk version 1.8.0_25
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_25-b18)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build
Tim:
I shall ask the obvious question: Did you completely quit Firefox so
that there were no other running Firefox processes?
Andre Robatino:
You're right, that must have been the problem. Last night I noticed
that there was a running Firefox process even after quitting the
graphical
Allegedly, on or about 30 December 2014, bruce sent:
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a ? is the correct behaviour in the case of there being
bruce ha scrito il 30/12/2014 alle 13:57:
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a ? is the correct behaviour in the case of there being
hidden SSIDs?
On 12/30/2014 06:54 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 18:13 +0100, antonio wrote:
if this behaviour is connected to hidden SSID
You're only hurting yourself by hiding it. Seriously, hiding it doesn't
do you *any* good.
Eventhough I wrote the paper on the Myth of hiding SSIDs in '03 and
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:13:18AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Eventhough I wrote the paper on the Myth of hiding SSIDs in '03 and
provided the method for exposing hidden SSIDs, many wireless
professionals still push this as a valuable tool to protect your
networks.
You can't kill some
Tim ha scrito il 30/12/2014 alle 15:47:
Allegedly, on or about 30 December 2014, bruce sent:
whether or not hiding does any good or not isn't the issue with what
antonio was/is presenting..
he;s simply saying/asking if there should be a bug filed in this case,
or if seeing a ? is the correct
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:32:03PM +0100, antonio wrote:
as network is a an extension of an office network, I do not want
anybody even see that network is extended
With all due respect, it doesn't matter. The Bad Guys(Tm) *will* see it,
SSID or not. WiFi scanning tools return all
On 12/28/2014 02:34 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
I am connected to a Picostation as repeater: sometimes laptop is
disconnected and I see a question mark on the top line wireless icon,
and it connects again only if I switch of and then on the wirelss...
in F20 it never happened.Smarthphone is
The wifi is working, but it's switch to a question mark icon: See
http://imgur.com/m1G7n9o
F21
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 12/30/2014 12:27 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
The wifi is working, but it's switch to a question mark icon: See
http://imgur.com/m1G7n9o
F21
It sounds as though it is trying to find a hotspot to connect to, and can't.
It can't because you still have to specify not just the ESSID but also
On 12/30/2014 11:31 AM, Temlakos wrote:
On 12/30/2014 12:27 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
The wifi is working, but it's switch to a question mark icon: See
http://imgur.com/m1G7n9o
F21
It sounds as though it is trying to find a hotspot to connect to, and
can't.
It can't because you still
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:03:07 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys [root@localhost ~]#
Clue, please?
I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo to work with fedup.
I ended up using --nogpgcheck (yes I am aware of the risks of doing
that)
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:04:51 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
[]
I've attached an old xorg.conf file of mine. If you take the Screen,
Monitor and possibly ServerLayout from that file and put them in
separate files or a single file in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d xorg will read
those and
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 03:41:04PM -0500, David A. De Graaf wrote:
In a few F21 GUI panels the icons are grotesquely large - 1.75 inches
square on a 15 inch wide monitor. Normal size would be ~0.25 in.
This makes the panel nearly incomprehensible. This occurs in, eg,
On 12/30/14 06:47, Tim wrote:
There are plenty of other CSS tricks you can do, if needed, but just
start off with getting the bare basics to work, first. Bearing in mind
that if you try to do something sensible like force all fonts to be a
useful readable size, you can get hamstrung by pages
On Dec 29, 2014 11:23 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 12/29/2014 12:55 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Dec 29, 2014 10:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I have two F21 systems on the same subnet. Client and server.
On the server I created a directory
On 2014-12-29 15:03, Greg Woods wrote:
Downloading failed: Didn't install any keys
[root@localhost ~]#
Clue, please?
I never could get the GPG part of the Rpmfusion repo to work with fedup. I
ended up using --nogpgcheck (yes I am aware of the risks of doing that) so
that I could
The question mark means that theres a sign-in page (such as in a cafe. )
--
Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote:
The wifi is working, but its switch to a question mark icon: See
32 matches
Mail list logo
