On 07/21/2015 06:49 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 07/20/2015 03:49 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 07/20/2015 01:42 PM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Hi,
~ getenforce
Enforcing
Please be aware that setenforce will only change the mode SELinux is
running in. For a permanent change, you have to edit the
James:
Books are a great idea, but don't forget the How Tos
Google how to samba fedora
Produces:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/12/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-samba-configuring.html
Lots of free information available in the How Tos
Thomas Dineen
On 7/20/2015 7:38 PM, Martin Cigorraga
Been some time since I did a yum update. Lots of reasons why it took me
so long.
Anyway, I did work through all the updates, then went to start my qemm
virt system and it is failing, asking me repeatedly for my password.
Details are:
Unable to connect to libvirt.
authentication failed:
- Original Message -
From: Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:58:05 AM
Subject: Re: dnf update vs Software Udpates
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:01:37
Suvayu, Matthew, you rock guys, thanks!
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015, 21:33 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:10:10AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I'm sorry but clean all is not necessary at all! clean metadata or
clean expire-cache should be sufficient.
You
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
To: Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com
Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:54:34 PM
Subject: Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 17:35:18 +0200,
Jan Zelený
On Tue 21 Jul 2015 14:32:08 Frederic Muller wrote:
Hi!
I just upgraded to F22 and my external monitor (a Koios 24 1920x1200)
no longer works in its native resolution. I can only get 1280 x 768 to
display.
Everything was working well before. My video chip is the Intel HD
Graphics 5500
On 07/21/2015 10:18 AM, jd1008 wrote:
I suspect that the bug is never fixed even in rel 2, nor do the lease
notes make any mention of the fix re: the automatically ignored bugs
from the previous rel.
When a bug is closed at EOL but still exists, you can reopen it and
change the version to a
for my info, when a bug can be defined orphaned, i.e. which is the grace
period not to be sorpassed???
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F22 (Twenty two)
on Fujitsu Lifebook A512
http://lugsaronno.altervista.org
http://campingmonterosa.altervista.org
--
users mailing list
On 07/21/2015 11:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:53:12PM +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
for my info, when a bug can be defined orphaned, i.e. which is the
grace period not to be sorpassed???
I don't know what sorpassed means. But
* When a Fedora release reaches
On 07/21/2015 10:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
* When a Fedora release reaches end-of-life, bugs filed against that
release are automatically closed as EOL. If you know that bug still
exists in a supported version, please reopen these and reassign them to
the current version or to rawhide.
You
Bit the bullet and rebooted and qemm is opening up and I can start my vms.
whew.
Now do I update the F21 VM??? ;)
On 07/21/2015 07:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/21/2015 07:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:38:57PM +0200, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do I need to
On Jul 20, 2015 6:53 PM, Joe Wulf joe_w...@yahoo.com wrote:
The Mark Sobell books are GOOD; I've not heard any rumors regarding a
RHEL7 update (sadly).
Mark did write a RHEL7 / Fedora 18 book, it's been out for a while. It's
very readable and covers most all general topics. The changes since
On 07/21/2015 07:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:38:57PM +0200, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do I need to reboot first or is this something more than a reboot?
Maybe just restart libvirtd?
systemctl restart libvirtd
and still:
Unable to connect to libvirt.
authentication
Hi,
I'm using Fedora 21 with XFCE desktop.
Is there a way to connect to WPS networks? NetworkManager doesn't show
an obvious option for it and the only option I see so far is this hack:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/120367/how-to-connect-to-wi-fi-ap-through-wps
Not very user-friendly interface
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:53:12PM +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
for my info, when a bug can be defined orphaned, i.e. which is the
grace period not to be sorpassed???
I don't know what sorpassed means. But
* When a Fedora release reaches end-of-life, bugs filed against that
release are
On 07/20/2015 11:57 AM, jd1008 wrote:
Is firewalld similar to fbsd's firewall app as far as rulesets are
concerned?
I don't know enough about fbsd to answer that.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:38:57PM +0200, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do I need to reboot first or is this something more than a reboot?
Maybe just restart libvirtd?
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:10:10AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I'm sorry but clean all is not necessary at all! clean metadata or
clean expire-cache should be sufficient.
You don't even need to do that. Just use the --refresh flag -- `dnf
--refresh upgrade`.
--
Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:18:09AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
It seems like if bugs against rel 1 are still open just before EOL,
and closed thereafter, AND, these bugs are no longer in rel 2,
does release 2 have any document stating that the bugs was fixed?
Sometimes? Usually not.
How can a user
On 21.07.2015, Radek Holy wrote:
IIUUC, this is not completely true. I believe that once both PackageKit and
DNF are integrated with the new CAShe [1], we will *be able* to improve this
situation [2].
I hope this will be done *fast*, because I have to clean all
*everytime* checking for
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:20:32AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
* When a Fedora release reaches end-of-life, bugs filed against that
release are automatically closed as EOL. If you know that bug still
exists in a supported version, please reopen these and reassign them to
the current version or to
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:32:58 -0400,
Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote:
Right, it still does not allow the depsolver to remove a capability at all. It
allows it only to replace a package which provides a required capability with
another package which provides it as well.
Can you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
Does anyone succeed to have an epson perfection 4490 photo scanner
working with fedora 21?
I have this scanner wich works with fedora 14 (I know..!!), and debian.
I tried to make a similar config with fedora21, but without any success.
..
On 07/21/2015 11:35 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/21/2015 10:18 AM, jd1008 wrote:
I suspect that the bug is never fixed even in rel 2, nor do the lease
notes make any mention of the fix re: the automatically ignored bugs
from the previous rel.
When a bug is closed at EOL but still exists, you
Just for fun, here's one that originated in fedora 9 and is
still there:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of
On 07/21/2015 06:49 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 07/20/2015 03:49 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 07/20/2015 01:42 PM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Hi,
~ getenforce
Enforcing
Please be aware that setenforce will only change the mode SELinux is
running in. For a permanent change, you have to edit the
my F17 F21 (netbook) worked to my wp-4530 using xsane, ... hth,...
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:25 PM, François Patte
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
Does anyone succeed to have an epson perfection 4490 photo scanner
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:36:26PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 21.07.2015, Radek Holy wrote:
IIUUC, this is not completely true. I believe that once both PackageKit and
DNF are integrated with the new CAShe [1], we will *be able* to improve
this situation [2].
I hope this will be
Hi!
I just upgraded to F22 and my external monitor (a Koios 24 1920x1200)
no longer works in its native resolution. I can only get 1280 x 768 to
display.
Everything was working well before. My video chip is the Intel HD
Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) (the laptop is a X1 Carbon 3rd generation).
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:32:08PM +0700, Frederic Muller wrote:
Hi!
I just upgraded to F22 and my external monitor (a Koios 24 1920x1200)
no longer works in its native resolution. I can only get 1280 x 768 to
display.
Everything was working well before. My video chip is the Intel HD
Hi guys,
In short: Can I use Class of Service[1] together with Host Based Attributes[2]?
It doesn't work for me.
The directory server uses Host Based Attributes to give different loginshell on
servers and desktops. The idea is that on a desktop machine a user can use
/bin/bash as the shell.
As a plea to users of Fedora:
If you get notifications from ABRT, the Automatic Bug Reporting Tool,
please spend a bit of time on submitting the _complete_ report instead
of only enabling shortened reports. Sometimes the shortened reports
may be interesting, but in enough cases they are useless.
Hi,
In F22 edge flip makes me crazy :) and after lot of google and trying to
find the right value using dconf-edito, I still cannot find a solution. I
just simply want to turn of this annoying feature when I move to the edge
of the screen my workplace is scrolling... do you have any idea how can
You can just run
# restorecon -R -v /
From the booted machine.
On 07/20/2015 03:49 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 07/20/2015 01:42 PM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Hi,
~ getenforce
Enforcing
Please be aware that setenforce will only change the mode SELinux is
running in. For a permanent change, you
On 07/21/2015 06:19 AM, Paul Tobias wrote:
Hi guys,
In short: Can I use Class of Service[1] together with Host Based Attributes[2]?
It doesn't work for me.
The directory server uses Host Based Attributes to give different loginshell on
servers and desktops. The idea is that on a desktop
On 07/20/2015 10:35 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I know this is off topic, but I don't know where else to ask: is anyone
else having problems accessing the ipcop website? The other day the
site returned an error. Today I see this:
The sourceforge.net website is
37 matches
Mail list logo
