Re: fedora 23 bluetooth connection

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:57:24PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 05:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > > On 07/26/16 02:49, Roger Wells wrote: > > > > > > Something changed (although not fatally): > > > I use Bluetooth speakers quite often. > > > Back in F22 or so

Re: USB drive name change -

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:46:04AM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 07/24/16 18:42, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > >It does what I asked! > > You seem to have /dev/sdd1 already mounted on /mnt/temp. > > > > And you've manually mounted /dev/sde1 on /mnt/temp as well as it being > > automounted on > >

Issues with doing a fedup upgrade from 23 to 24

Not sure what the issue is. Am currently 7 timezones away from my classroom machines, but wanted to update a few before I get back. Had to run the process 3 times on first machine before it finally did the upgrade. fedup --network 24 --allowerasing Process seems to go thru just fine, and then do

[389-users] Announcing 389 Admin Server 1.1.43 and Consoles for EPEL6

389 Admin Server 1.1.43 and Consoles for EPEL6 The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-admin version 1.1.42, 389-adminutil version 1.1.22, 389-console version 1.1.16, 389-ds-console version 1.2.12, 389-admin-console version 1.1.11, and idm-console-framework version version

Re: fedora 23 bluetooth connection

On 07/26/16 06:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 05:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 07/26/16 02:49, Roger Wells wrote: >>> Something changed (although not fatally): >>> I use Bluetooth speakers quite often. >>> Back in F22 or so after pairing the device merely turning it

Re: fedora 23 bluetooth connection

On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 05:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 07/26/16 02:49, Roger Wells wrote: > > > > Something changed (although not fatally): > > I use Bluetooth speakers quite often. > > Back in F22 or so after pairing the device merely turning it on caused > > Fedora to connect to it. > >

Re: fedora 23 bluetooth connection

On 07/26/16 02:49, Roger Wells wrote: > Something changed (although not fatally): > I use Bluetooth speakers quite often. > Back in F22 or so after pairing the device merely turning it on caused > Fedora to connect to it. > Several months ago, now on F23, (not sure when this problem appeared) >

Re: Date change on reboot

On 07/25/2016 09:38 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/25/16 22:30, Tim wrote: >> Tim: I'm sceptical, too (about that belief). I'm inclined to believe that story has been conjured up by someone to explain things, and everyone else has simply gone along with it. >> Joe Zeff: >>> Be as

[389-users] advice for multiple domains

Hi folks, I need to centralize the authentication of three different domains with 389-DS. It is possible? -- 389-users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedora 23 bluetooth connection

Something changed (although not fatally): I use Bluetooth speakers quite often. Back in F22 or so after pairing the device merely turning it on caused Fedora to connect to it. Several months ago, now on F23, (not sure when this problem appeared) that changed and after turning the speaker on, I

Re: WiFi conflicting with Bluetooth

On 07/23/2016 09:00 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Tod Merley wrote: >> .. so what mods are loaded to handle wifi and bluetooth ... > > 03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4331 > 802.11a/b/g/n [14e4:4331] (rev 02) >

Re: Date change on reboot

On 07/25/2016 07:30 AM, Tim wrote: I'd like to see some proof that it's actually designed to run slow when the battery goes flat, as opposed that merely being what happens. All I can tell you (not being a hardware geek) is that I learned about it from the guy who's done all my hardware work

[389-users] Multi Master Replication with SSL Error when creating replication agreement

Hi I have tried to follow http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-walkthroughmultimasterssl.html#set-up-multi-master-replication to setup a multimaster setup with 389 LDAP servers. I have 2 servers and I have clients connected to both using SSL to authenticate. Both servers

Re: Fwd: Your message to users@lists.fedoraproject.org awaits moderator approval

On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 08:22 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > I received the following message about 10 days ago, but still haven't seen it > posted or received the moderators rejection notice.  Since there seems to be > no > way to reach the moderator directly, I'm reduced to posting this to the

Fwd: Your message to users@lists.fedoraproject.org awaits moderator approval

I received the following message about 10 days ago, but still haven't seen it posted or received the moderators rejection notice.  Since there seems to be no way to reach the moderator directly, I'm reduced to posting this to the list. The original posting had Subject: Dragon/Kplayer

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 10:52, Ed Greshko wrote: And Thank You for your understanding that Jack Daniels isn't always compatible with sound advice. + Hick, -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-24/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3 -- users mailing list

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 22:41, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 07/25/16 10:12, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 07/25/16 22:07, Bob Goodwin wrote: >>> ># tune2fs -L st1000 >> Ooopppsss My bad Having a night cap and forgot the most important >> part... >> >> tune2fs -L st1000 /dev/sdd1 >> >> How else will it know

Re: Date change on reboot

Well - i hate to butt in here but i can most definitely say that my wristwatch for example most definitely indicates a dying battery by only moving the second hand every 2 seconds instead of 1 second - BUT it moves 2 increments each 2 seconds - but i have no idea if that has any relevance! >

Re: Date change on reboot

[snip] I shall certainly check the battery but I don't see how the battery could caise so many "bad" log entries spanning several hours in one minute. Look again at the snippet I included. Cheers, Stephen [snip] Good, this is just methodology starting with the battery. Possible to expand your

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 10:12, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/25/16 22:07, Bob Goodwin wrote: ># tune2fs -L st1000 Ooopppsss My bad Having a night cap and forgot the most important part... tune2fs -L st1000 /dev/sdd1 How else will it know what filesystem we're talking about? :-) :-) -- + And that

Re: Date change on reboot

On 07/25/16 22:30, Tim wrote: > Tim: >>> I'm sceptical, too (about that belief). I'm inclined to believe that >>> story has been conjured up by someone to explain things, and everyone >>> else has simply gone along with it. > Joe Zeff: >> Be as skeptical as you want, but it's been true ever

Re: Date change on reboot

Allegedly, on or about 25 July 2016, Stephen Davies sent: > I shall certainly check the battery but I don't see how the battery > could caise so many "bad" log entries spanning several hours in one > minute. Is the log generated in real time, as it happens? Or are you getting slew of things

Re: Date change on reboot

Tim: >> I'm sceptical, too (about that belief). I'm inclined to believe that >> story has been conjured up by someone to explain things, and everyone >> else has simply gone along with it. Joe Zeff: > Be as skeptical as you want, but it's been true ever since I got my > first PC in the late

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 22:07, Bob Goodwin wrote: > # tune2fs -L st1000 Ooopppsss My bad Having a night cap and forgot the most important part... tune2fs -L st1000 /dev/sdd1 How else will it know what filesystem we're talking about? :-) :-) -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto -- users mailing

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 09:43, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/25/16 21:40, Bob Goodwin wrote: ># tune2fs -l /dev/sdd1 >tune2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) >Filesystem volume name: OK Do tune2fs -L st1000 and then tune2fs -l to see if changes -- + That's what I thought after reading through the man

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 21:40, Bob Goodwin wrote: > # tune2fs -l /dev/sdd1 > tune2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) > Filesystem volume name: OK Do tune2fs -L st1000 and then tune2fs -l to see if changes -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 09:35, Ed Greshko wrote: What is the output of "tune2fs -l /dev/sdd1" # tune2fs -l /dev/sdd1 tune2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) Filesystem volume name: Last mounted on: /mnt/temp Filesystem UUID: a3cd7e7f-254d-410a-b120-e02524f75a29 Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 19:46, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 07/24/16 18:42, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >It does what I asked! >> You seem to have /dev/sdd1 already mounted on /mnt/temp. >> >> And you've manually mounted /dev/sde1 on /mnt/temp as well as it being >> automounted on >> /run/media/bobg. >> >> Not sure

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/16 08:01, Joe Zeff wrote: On 07/25/2016 04:46 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: So the command 'e2label /dev/sdd1 st1000' makes it possible to add another device, it doesn't change the name. What did I miss in setting up the external drive initially? Two questions: first, have you rebooted,

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/25/2016 04:46 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: So the command 'e2label /dev/sdd1 st1000' makes it possible to add another device, it doesn't change the name. What did I miss in setting up the external drive initially? Two questions: first, have you rebooted, or otherwise unmounted/remounted

Re: USB drive name change -

On 07/24/16 18:42, Ed Greshko wrote: >It does what I asked! You seem to have /dev/sdd1 already mounted on /mnt/temp. And you've manually mounted /dev/sde1 on /mnt/temp as well as it being automounted on /run/media/bobg. Not sure that is what you wanted to accomplish. + After boot this

Re: Date change on reboot

hello Tim and Joe. On 07/25/2016 01:03 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/24/2016 08:40 PM, Tim wrote: >> I'm sceptical, too (about that belief). I'm inclined to believe that >> story has been conjured up by someone to explain things, and everyone >> else has simply gone along with it. > > Be as

Re: Date change on reboot

On 24 July 2016 8:14:07 PM ACST, fred roller wrote: >First thing I would check is the CMOS battery if you have one or can >get to >it. Sounds like system time is not being held. Go through boot log. If >the >system corrects shortly after a. Nts comes up and b. Network

Re: Date change on reboot

On 07/24/2016 08:40 PM, Tim wrote: I'm sceptical, too (about that belief). I'm inclined to believe that story has been conjured up by someone to explain things, and everyone else has simply gone along with it. Be as skeptical as you want, but it's been true ever since I got my first PC in