wscat gone

Hello, I don't see wscat in fedora 24, why is it gone? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Good article on systemd

Allegedly, on or about 01 October 2016, Ed Greshko sent: > Maybe the point Rex was making was simply that discussion could be had > and frustrations could be vented but minus the Ad Hominem attacks? Dunno. The willful blindness to its problems, and lack of concern about it's shortcomings, and

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:24:05 +0200 Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray > > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to

autofs not downloading maps after upgrade to sssd 1.4.1

We have a CentOS 6 system that is running an LDAP server for users, groups, and autofs maps. After applying updates to a couple of Fedora 23 systems and rebooting, they could no longer get the autofs maps from the server. After poking around a bit and turning on all the logging features in sssd,

[SOLVED] rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:06:46 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: > > Looking at that, I'm wondering if your line 31 in the "%install" > section should read: > > /bin/python3 setup.py install --prefix=%{_prefix} --root=%{buildroot} > > As it is now, it's depending on a relative

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as > a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm > and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. > > I have created

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On 10/03/2016 10:04 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 >> Ranjan Maitra wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across >>>

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:44:41 -0700 stan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Sorry, here is the corrected > > > > $ fpaste battray.spec > > Uploading (1.6KiB)... > >

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Sorry, here is the corrected > > $ fpaste battray.spec > Uploading (1.6KiB)... > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ -> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714 I think this is still wrong. It

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across > > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:30:44 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: > On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray > > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a >

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across > > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it > together as a rpm and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. > > I have

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as > a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm > and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. > > I have created the following spec

Re: boot messages display

On 03.10.2016 15:35, François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > I am wondering why since f23 the boot messages display stops at "switch > root"? > > on f21 all thee messages are displayed... > > Thank you. > > -- > François Patte > UFR de mathématiques et informatique > Laboratoire CNRS MAP5,

boot messages display

Bonjour, I am wondering why since f23 the boot messages display stops at "switch root"? on f21 all thee messages are displayed... Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris

Re: Odd behaviour for GREP

Sorry, should be "directory is searchable bur not readable". On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Tom Killian wrote: > People, >> >> On F25 x86_64 as user "fedora" with default environment I get: >> >> grep Cock application.html.erb >> >>Provider for the National

Re: Odd behaviour for GREP

> > People, > > On F25 x86_64 as user "fedora" with default environment I get: > > grep Cock application.html.erb > >Provider for the National Disability Insurance Trial Site in Kwinana/ > Cockburn > > grep Cock * > >grep: *: No such file or directory This behaviour generally means that

rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

Hi, I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. I have created the following spec file available here:

Re: Gnome shell high memory usage

> > > How about contributing the info they need on the upstream bug (see link > above) to fix this issue? Free software can only evolve if people > contribute, this includes useful information for fixing bugs. > > Will do. -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez

Re: Problem with firewalld/iptables and ftp access list?

On 10/03/16 19:40, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > That seems to make it work fine, but not sure what changed from it working > before in earlier versions or kernels and now not working? > Comment 5 seems to have some more info, but don't know if this is a bug, or a > new feature (one must

Re: Problem with firewalld/iptables and ftp access list?

On 3 Oct 2016 at 18:39, Ed Greshko wrote: From: Ed Greshko Subject:Re: Problem with firewalld/iptables and ftp access list? To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date sent: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:39:44 +0800 Send

Re: Problem with firewalld/iptables and ftp access list?

On 10/03/16 15:32, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > Cleaned up the firewall-config extra port options, and tried it on another > machine as > well. Did note that after a reboot, it shows nf_conntract_ftp as being > loaded, but not > being used by anything. If I stop firewalld and start iptables

Re: Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 08:00 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > do you mean to change the location (the directory) of the script ? [Please don't top-post, see the list Guidelines] No, I mean create your own small script that calls the supplied one, and put it in your own bin directory. Edit your

Re: Problem with firewalld/iptables and ftp access list?

Cleaned up the firewall-config extra port options, and tried it on another machine as well. Did note that after a reboot, it shows nf_conntract_ftp as being loaded, but not being used by anything. If I stop firewalld and start iptables it then shows that it is being used?? firewall-config