On 12/31/18 6:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
When it happened before I edited the XML file to remove the .osxsave
flag and that solved the problem. However now it's happening with a
fresh VM so there's no XML file to edit.
Try commenting out that feature in /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml
Open mouth and insert foot. :-)
I was was not paying attention Computers can sure make one look
pretty stupid!!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
> The current kernel that I am running according to uname -r is:
>
> 4.19.12-301.fc29.x86_64
>
> However when I run "dnf upgrade" today I get the following dependencies
> to be installed:
>
> Installing dependencies:
> kernel-core x86_64 4.19.13-
> 300.fc29
I just upgraded to F29 from F28 yesterday.
The current kernel that I am running according to uname -r is:
4.19.12-301.fc29.x86_64
However when I run "dnf upgrade" today I get the following dependencies
to be installed:
Installing dependencies:
kernel-core x86_64
On 1/3/19 1:05 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a desktop and a laptop, both with fully updated Fedora 29. The
> laptop is a fresh installation while the desktop has been upgraded from
> previous versions of Fedora. And I have Josm installed on both.
>
> Now the problem is that on the
On 1/3/19 10:41 AM, William Oliver wrote:
So, here's an easier (I hope) question. I remember back in the day,
when I would power up my machine in dual boot mode, grub would give me
a grub menu that let me choose the OS. Now, it just comes up in
Windows. If I want to boot into Fedora, I have to
Hi
I have a desktop and a laptop, both with fully updated Fedora 29. The
laptop is a fresh installation while the desktop has been upgraded from
previous versions of Fedora. And I have Josm installed on both.
Now the problem is that on the desktop Josm has become really slow. You
need some
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 12:44 -0500, William Oliver wrote:
> I just installed Fedora29 on my brand new HP laptop. The
> installation
> went fine, and Fedora comes up fine. However, I was trying to
> install
> it as a dual boot machine, and the Windows option does not come up
> either with a
echo 1 > /sys/block/sdX/device/delete
And the device should disappear.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:01 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Ian Malone said:
> > Does anyone have suggestions for easily simulating a missing volume in
> > LVM on bare metal?
>
> Actually make a volume go
I just installed Fedora29 on my brand new HP laptop. The installation
went fine, and Fedora comes up fine. However, I was trying to install
it as a dual boot machine, and the Windows option does not come up
either with a "normal" grub bootup or when I choose boot options in
BIOS.
THe box has
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 09:25 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 1/3/19 9:13 AM, William Oliver wrote:
> > I just bought a brand new little HP laptop and decided to try to
> > install Fedora 29. I created the bootable flash drive in Windows
> > using
> > Rufus. When I try to boot from the flash drive,
Once upon a time, Ian Malone said:
> Does anyone have suggestions for easily simulating a missing volume in
> LVM on bare metal?
Actually make a volume go missing? The easiest way to do that would be
USB volumes (thumb drives), and just yank the drive out. Even if you
don't want to physically
Does anyone have suggestions for easily simulating a missing volume in
LVM on bare metal? I'm trying to test behaviour like a network
attached physical volume going missing (actually, a network mounted
virtual disc image). The normal loopback approach to testing falls a
bit short, while
13 matches
Mail list logo
