On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 07:50 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 23:13:43 -0700Jonathan Ryshpan <
> jonr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > What is akonadi? What is baloo? Why does akonadi usually crash
> > onsystem startup? Why does akonadi or maybe baloo sometimes use
> > 100% ofcpu? Wh
On 6/21/19 9:19 PM, bradb...@seanet.com wrote:
The process ' jobmemd-daemon' and the problem seem to have gone away.
Here is my system details:
~>uname -a
Linux brad-home 5.0.9-301.fc30.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 23:57:35 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I am running inside of virtual box
On 6/22/19 12:31 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 6/21/19 9:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 6/22/19 10:36 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> On 6/21/19 7:18 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/21/19 6:50 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/21/2019 05:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 6
On 6/22/19 12:16 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> But, yes, before posting that I didn't know what they were, I had read
> the package info, and it didn't particularly leave me any wiser.
>
> $ dnf info openvswitch
>
> Description: Open vSwitch provides standard network bridging functions
> and support f
On 6/21/19 9:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 6/22/19 10:36 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/21/19 7:18 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/21/19 6:50 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/21/2019 05:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 6/22/19 7:07 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I have found that the onl
The process ' jobmemd-daemon' and the problem seem to have gone away.
Here is my system details:
~>uname -a
Linux brad-home 5.0.9-301.fc30.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 23:57:35 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I am running inside of virtual box 5.2.30 with a windows host.
___
Ed Greshko:
>>> I guess you did "dnf info openvswitch" and "dnf info libhugetlbf"?
>>>
>>> I'm guessing those are what resulted in the reservation of the
>>> ID's.
Jon LaBadie:
>> What? Just asking for information as an ordinary user might
>> cause a change to system files? Doesn't seem likely.
On 6/22/19 10:36 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 6/21/19 7:18 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> On 6/21/19 6:50 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2019 05:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 6/22/19 7:07 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I have found that the only reliable file manger th
On 6/22/19 11:58 AM, Tim via users wrote:
??
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/
Try to boot on battery only (w/o adapter) and on AC adapter only (w/o battery).
May be this is a power issue since it is able to start booting.
Memory problems usually lead to BSOD, not power off.
21.06.2019, 18:56, "Robert Moskowitz" :
> I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
>
>
On 6/21/19 7:18 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/21/19 6:50 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/21/2019 05:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 6/22/19 7:07 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I have found that the only reliable file manger that works with
my Androids is Nautilus.
dolphin on KDE works well
On 6/21/19 6:50 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/21/2019 05:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 6/22/19 7:07 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I have found that the only reliable file manger that works with
my Androids is Nautilus.
dolphin on KDE works well for me with both Android 9.X and 8.X
As does th
On 06/21/2019 05:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 6/22/19 7:07 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I have found that the only reliable file manger that works with
my Androids is Nautilus.
dolphin on KDE works well for me with both Android 9.X and 8.X
As does thunar under Xfce.
On 6/22/19 3:11 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I received the above via the Announce list on Friday June 21, after
> voting had closed. I don't know if others have had the same experience,
> but clearly something is amiss.
No problems here. Actually got 3 message on announce. Time received is
On 6/22/19 7:07 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I have found that the only reliable file manger that works with
> my Androids is Nautilus.
dolphin on KDE works well for me with both Android 9.X and 8.X
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default
color
On 06/21/2019 04:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
It is mounted as A20Pro
I can umount, but the Folder is empty
I would expect exactly that, because the command umount unmounts a
partition. What happens if you explore the folder without using umount?
__
On 6/21/19 3:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to access to my Android (8.1.0, kernel 4.4.95+) through the USB
cable, but I fails.
Using sshfs, it works fine:
sshfs pdupre@192.168.1.15:/storage/emulated/0 -p /home/pdupre/Android
and I get all the hierarchy
Now through the USB
Hello,
I am trying to access to my Android (8.1.0, kernel 4.4.95+) through the USB
cable, but I fails.
Using sshfs, it works fine:
sshfs pdupre@192.168.1.15:/storage/emulated/0 -p /home/pdupre/Android
and I get all the hierarchy
Now through the USB cable, I can see the Android:
It is mounted
On 6/21/19 5:20 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Couldn't you just rename them back? Renaming the directory won't lose
the data.
__
.
Apparently not, when I did I got empty files, sub directories and
filters were gone. I used the Thunar file manager since it takes less
typing that rena
On 6/21/19 5:20 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Couldn't you just rename them back? Renaming the directory won't lose
the data.
__
.
Apparently not, when I did I got empty files, sub directories and
filters were gone. I used the Thunar file manager since it takes less
typing that rena
On 6/21/19 5:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
For future reference, the file .thunderbird/profiles.ini will tell you which is
being used
by default.
.
Good to know, thanks.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83 FEDORA-29/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
_
On 6/21/19 12:33 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Is it an issue with the stick, or it is because I have not been able to
configure properly the bios to boot on an external USB stick (efi?) ?
Check in the BIOS to make sure there is a USB option in the EFI boot
list. You can also try to disable legacy
On 6/22/19 5:03 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> I guess you did "dnf info openvswitch" and "dnf info libhugetlbf"?
>>
>> I'm guessing those are what resulted in the reservation of the ID's.
> What? Just asking for information as an ordinary user might
> cause a change to system files? Doesn't seem like
On 6/21/19 2:08 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I tried this, found that I had two .thunderbird/xxxdefault files and
tried renaming them to determine which was the active one. Should not
have done that, I am reconfiguring Thunderbird after losing those files.
Couldn't you just rename them back? Renami
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 15:10, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 6/20/19 3:44 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Ended up taking just over 12 hours?
> > Just wondering why the process took so long.
>
>
> IIRC, there will be dnf logs of the process. I would take a look at
> those to see if the rate was
On 6/22/19 5:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I tried this, found that I had two .thunderbird/xxxdefault files and tried
> renaming them
> to determine which was the active one. Should not
> have done that, I am reconfiguring Thunderbird after losing those files.
For future reference, the file .thund
On 6/20/19 8:01 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Here's what is probably the easiest method. Go into your Thunderbird
profile extensions folder, something like:
.thunderbird/randomchars.default/extensions
Open the tonequi...@mesquilla.com.xpi file with archive manager. Open
the install.rdf file ins
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:31:46PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 6/18/19 10:56 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently set up Fedora 30 as a new install on a blank SDD. When I
> > went to create my user it got UID 1000, as I expected (since I was the
> > first user). But, not as I exp
Hello,
I guess that you pointed on one issue.
This machine (a Dell) used to boot efi for fedora, but when I plug the USB
stick I have to boot legacy. It seems that it was the only option to
boot on the USB stick.
While this is what is on the USB:
EFI images isolinux LiveOS
Is someting wrong?
I
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 20:03 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Voting is now open for the Fedora 30 election cycle. You can vote in
> the Elections app[1]. Interviews with candidates are available on the
> Fedora Community Blog[2], with links available in the Elections app.
> Voting ends at 23:59 UTC on 20
x120e memory is different than the x130e so no shortcut there.
On 6/21/19 2:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 6/21/19 1:36 PM, stan via users wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
Any recommendations on wh
On 6/21/19 1:36 PM, stan via users wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
Any recommendations on what I can do with this system? I will check
on memory, but otherwise, HELP. Please?
First recommendation is
On 6/21/19 1:35 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
What is the advantage in having the /boot/efi on a single partition,
and not /boot for example (which was the case before EFI)?
UEFI doesn't boot from code stuffed into a tiny section of the MBR.
Under UEFI, the non-volatile RAM holds a description of
On 6/21/19 5:35 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
But I get the following message:
Your bios-based system needs a special partition to boot from a GPT disk label.
To continue please create a 1Mb /biosboot type
There is already a fedora installed on sdb
Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
Numb
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
> Any recommendations on what I can do with this system? I will check
> on memory, but otherwise, HELP. Please?
First recommendation is relax. The system won't get worse by let
On 6/20/19 3:44 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Ended up taking just over 12 hours?
Just wondering why the process took so long.
IIRC, there will be dnf logs of the process. I would take a look at
those to see if the rate was steady for the entire period, or if there
was a period of time wh
I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked.
I put in the Win10 HD. It starts to boot and the windows logo starts
spinning and the system promptly shuts down.
It may be memory, and I will have to see if I have any matching memory
here (see if it uses the same as my x120e which I hav
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:03:06 +0100
lejeczek via users wrote:
> I've been waiting for this hoping newer versions of kernel will not
> need this but still, not even 5.1.11-300.fc30.x86_64 would boot.
>
> I want to ask you guys if your Ryzens (APUs) are good and do NOT need
> that option?
I don't
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 23:13:43 -0700
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> What is akonadi? What is baloo? Why does akonadi usually crash on
There's this thing called web search now. I was curious, so I did the
search. Here are the results.
Akonadi is a storage service for personal information management
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:35:10 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> What is the advantage in having the /boot/efi on a single partition,
> and not /boot for example (which was the case before EFI)?
> In addition, the /boot/efi is a fat32.
>
> Thank to clarify this point.
It's not really an advantage,
Hello,
On a system with 2 HD,
1 SSH (sdb) and 1 standard HD (sda) of 2 TBit
I wanted to make a fresh (and basic) installation on sda
I created a 15 GB ext4 partition for that purpose.
Using the installer (from a USB stick).
I selected my partition (sda6) for the system (/)
But I get the following
hi guys,
I've been waiting for this hoping newer versions of kernel will not need
this but still, not even 5.1.11-300.fc30.x86_64 would boot.
I want to ask you guys if your Ryzens (APUs) are good and do NOT need
that option?
many thanks, L.
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 20:37, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Have a notebook that I had installed Fedora on some time ago.
> Have upgraded it via DNF a few times, but this time I actually was
> watching it
> versus just coming back later to find it done.
> The clean installation only took about 20
Hello,
What is the advantage in having the /boot/efi on a single partition,
and not /boot for example (which was the case before EFI)?
In addition, the /boot/efi is a fat32.
Thank to clarify this point.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
On 6/21/19 3:00 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/20/19 10:59 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
>> Disk doesn't seem to be slow, but don't know what results an SDD wourld
>> have.
>> hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
>>
>> /dev/sda:
>> Timing cached reads: 6180 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3095.49 MB/sec
>> Timing buff
I agree with Stan. This seems like a config (or rather, routing) problem.
Also, what application are you attempting to record audio into?
Here's an overview of Linux sound I wrote for opensource.com:
https://opensource.com/article/17/1/linux-plays-sound
It might help you troubleshoot.
On Fri, J
Hi
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:56:02 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/20/19 5:41 PM, bradb...@seanet.com wrote:
>> When I execute the top, the first process is
>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
>> 11325 root 20 0 135m 27m 1960 S 16.1 0.0 1192:48 jobme
On 6/20/19 10:59 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Except for the time, everything went ok.
Install gsmartcontrol and test your hard drive
$ dnf whatprovides gsmartcontrol
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Fri 21 Jun 2019 12:08:04
AM PDT.
gsmartcontrol-1.1.3-4.fc30.x86_64 : Graphi
On 6/20/19 10:59 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Disk doesn't seem to be slow, but don't know what results an SDD wourld
have.
hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 6180 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3095.49 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 406 MB in 3.01 seconds = 134.89 MB/sec
50 matches
Mail list logo