On 11/6/19 10:54 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:04:53 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/5/19 1:34 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Thanks very much. We may have been looking at different posts, so I would
appreciate if you could point me to some sources.
I found there is already a Fed
On 11/7/19 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Tinkering with my driver is (alas) beyond my skill level.
I'm not suggesting you tinker with your driver.
When you boot your system there normally is the option to use ESC or some key
combination to get to
a screen where you can do things such as set
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:01:35 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/5/19 10:00 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> >
> > Graphics:
> >Device-1: Intel 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated
> > Graphics vendor: CLEVO/KAPOK driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0
> > chip ID: 8086:0126 Device-2: NVI
On 11/6/19 3:39 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Does anyone have PXE booting working ?
Yes, for both legacy and EFI modes.
I am nearly there but was wondering if anyone would share their
iptabels/firewall-cmd, dhcpd, and pxelinux.cfg files please ?
I have everything up to the dns + http/https stage wo
And your freeze does not sound like a kernel error, or at least you
don't have a kernel error to work with.
Are you using firefox? if so you should watch its size with top, on a
machine I have with only 10GB of ram it has almost required me to
reset it as firefox was using so much memory and caus
Does anyone have PXE booting working ?
I am nearly there but was wondering if anyone would share their
iptabels/firewall-cmd, dhcpd, and pxelinux.cfg files please ?
I have everything up to the dns + http/https stage working.
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
--
Aaron Gray
Independent Open Source
On 11/7/19 1:02 AM, linux guy wrote:
It froze again this morning. I received this SELinux error:
SELinux is preventing abrt-action-sav from write access on the file
/var/lib/rpm/.dbenv.lock.
I can't say I ever recall a selinux error being associated with a freeze as you
described in
your in
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 18:46 +, Petr Menšík wrote:
> It should not be deleted. It is packaged contents of usr/share/GeoIP/, just
> bind mounted into /var/named/chroot when named-chroot.service is running. As
> soon as it stops, it is unmounted.
What is "it"? Kindly follow long-standing conven
On 11/06/19 13:44, D&R wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:33:07 -0500
bobgood...@fastmail.us wrote:
.
In an attempt to install a Fedora 30 Notecase Pro rpm in °fedora 31 I
find that it requires "libunique-1.0.so" and I was unable to find that
with dnf.
dnf whatprovides libunique gives no matches fou
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:04:53 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/5/19 1:34 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:29:28 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/5/19 11:29 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> Thanks very much! This is more complicated that I thought with unclear
> >>> chances
Hi Todd,
It should not be deleted. It is packaged contents of usr/share/GeoIP/, just
bind mounted into /var/named/chroot when named-chroot.service is running. As
soon as it stops, it is unmounted.
mount --bind means it does not use more space. It can be a bit confusing, but
those files are sti
In an attempt to install a Fedora 30 Notecase Pro rpm in °fedora 31 I
find that it requires "libunique-1.0.so" and I was unable to find that
with dnf.
dnf whatprovides libunique gives no matches found.
Where should I look for"libunique-1.0.so" an rpm?
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia,
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:33:07 -0500
bobgood...@fastmail.us wrote:
> .
> In an attempt to install a Fedora 40 Notecase Pro rpm in °fedora 31 I
> find that it requires "libunique-1.0.so" and I was unable to find that
> with dnf.
>
> dnf whatprovides libunique gives no matches found.
try
dnf whatpr
.
In an attempt to install a Fedora 40 Notecase Pro rpm in °fedora 31 I
find that it requires "libunique-1.0.so" and I was unable to find that
with dnf.
dnf whatprovides libunique gives no matches found.
Where should I look for"libunique-1.0.so" an rpm?
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia,
On 11/06/2019 10:02 AM, linux guy wrote:
If you believe that abrt-action-sav should be allowed write access on
the .dbenv.lock file by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
Have you reported it? If not, why?
___
users mailing list -- users@
It froze again this morning. I received this SELinux error:
SELinux is preventing abrt-action-sav from write access on the file
/var/lib/rpm/.dbenv.lock.
* Plugin restorecon (99.5 confidence) suggests
If you want to fix the label.
/var/lib/rpm/.dbenv.lock default l
16 matches
Mail list logo
