I wanted to add that I am able to connect with other wifi modems/routers but for this one. The machines in question are Dell XPS 13 (2018) running Fedora 31 and Dell M3800 (2014) running Fedora 30. None of them have Broadcom wifi.
Thanks,
Ranjan
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2020 at
Hi,
I have been lost for the past day and I need some help.
There are 7 android devices and a linux mint laptop that effortlessly connect to a linkhub (Alcatel HH41NH). There is no limit to the number of devices that the linkhub can connect to.
However, two Fedora laptops each running
On Thursday, January 2, 2020 9:47:44 AM MST Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 17:05:41 -0700,
>
> "John M. Harris Jr." wrote:
> >If that's the case for LVM, then it seems that mdadm would be the easier
> >and safer option. You simply create an array with a missing disk, copy the
> On 3 Jan 2020, at 07:14, Marc Sauton wrote:
>
> the build string
> 389-Directory/1.3.9.1 B2019.164.1418
> corresponds to a RHEL-7.7 with RHDS-10.4
> to verify:
> cat /etc/redhat-release; rpm -q redhat-ds 389-ds-base
>
> the access and errors log snippets are showing a "normal" timeout after
the build string
389-Directory/1.3.9.1 B2019.164.1418
corresponds to a RHEL-7.7 with RHDS-10.4
to verify:
cat /etc/redhat-release; rpm -q redhat-ds 389-ds-base
the access and errors log snippets are showing a "normal" timeout after
10mn, when there is no activity, and they do not really provide
Hi Steve,
We see it happening with replication connections from other 389 DS servers
in the cluster (but because it is multi-master, other replications masters'
succeed, so its OK).
However, we also see it with other clients - they will initiate a
connection, but the connection will hang and the
Is it possible that that application is pro-actively creating LDAP connections
that it does not use? This scenario might happen if the application is using
connection pooling.
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Fong
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 10:16 AM
To:
Happy New Year, everyone!
Further to this, I added connection management loglevel to the errorlog level
and managed to capture the output during one of the events when the connection
seems to stall. Would anyone be able to help me make sense of it?
Thanks a lot,
Trevor Fong
Access log:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 17:05:41 -0700,
"John M. Harris Jr." wrote:
If that's the case for LVM, then it seems that mdadm would be the easier and
safer option. You simply create an array with a missing disk, copy the data
over, then add the existing disk to the array.
If you copy block by
On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 at 23:21, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> It would seem that "something" happened to the file(s) that provide
> RJ45 Ethernet connectivity maybe as far back as F29. I can get a WiFi
> connection, but not an RJ45 eth0 DHCP connection.
On 2020-01-02 19:01, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 2020-01-01 20:40, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> OK, I can tell you what I think you want.
>>
>> On the "Applications Menu" go to "Settings--->Panel Profiles". In the Panel
>> Profiles GUI
>> select "Xfce 4.12". and then click on the 2 gears at the bottom
On 2020-01-01 20:40, Ed Greshko wrote:
OK, I can tell you what I think you want.
On the "Applications Menu" go to "Settings--->Panel Profiles". In the Panel
Profiles GUI
select "Xfce 4.12". and then click on the 2 gears at the bottom left to "Apply
Configuration".
.
Ah yes, that is
On 2020-01-02 18:56, François Patte wrote:
> Le 02/01/2020 à 11:23, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 2020-01-02 18:09, François Patte wrote:
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> I installed the last version of virtualbox (6.1.0) but I cant't find the
>>> right extension pack which fit this version I got
>>>
Le 02/01/2020 à 11:23, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 2020-01-02 18:09, François Patte wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I installed the last version of virtualbox (6.1.0) but I cant't find the
>> right extension pack which fit this version I got
>> Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.1.0.vbox-extpack but
On 2020-01-02 18:09, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I installed the last version of virtualbox (6.1.0) but I cant't find the
> right extension pack which fit this version I got
> Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.1.0.vbox-extpack but virtualbox
> refuses to load it:
>
>
On 2020-01-02 18:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 2020-01-01 20:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I think you're talking about "tabs" and not "windows"?
>
> .
>
> No, I am referring to "windows."
Right, continue reading the thread. :-)
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
On 2020-01-01 20:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
I think you're talking about "tabs" and not "windows"?
.
No, I am referring to "windows."
The tabs are displayed in a row below the menu bar containing Files,
Edit, View, etc, that part is normal, What I am referring to is just
above the Firefox
Bonjour,
I installed the last version of virtualbox (6.1.0) but I cant't find the
right extension pack which fit this version I got
Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.1.0.vbox-extpack but virtualbox
refuses to load it:
Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-6.1.0.vbox-extpack'
On 2020-01-02 16:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 1/1/20 7:48 PM, John Mellor wrote:
>> However, I believe that you have completely missed the point of the threads.
>> If Gnome (for example) is not API-safe and failures may occur when
>> upgrading its components and/or apps, then a suitable
On 1/1/20 7:48 PM, John Mellor wrote:
However, I believe that you have completely missed the point of the
threads. If Gnome (for example) is not API-safe and failures may occur
when upgrading its components and/or apps, then a suitable workaround
would possibly be to install only those app
20 matches
Mail list logo
