On 2020-09-02 11:03, George Avrunin wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:57:38 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
I'm using KDE. Brave causes no problems except for breaking maybe one
Web site in twenty or twenty-five. But that's not a Fedora or KDE problem.
Temlakos
Also on KDE, Fedora 32,
On 2020-09-03 02:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>> On 9/2/20 9:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>> $ sudo dnf distro-sync
>>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM
>>> CDT.
>>> Error:
>>> Problem: The operation
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 13:57, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> So, I have been trying to upgrade this fully updated f31 machine on the
> CLI. I have tried the following:
>
>
> $ sudo dnf --refresh upgrade
> Adobe Systems Incorporated 17 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
> Fedora 31 openh264
On 9/2/20 3:30 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
might want to try adding --allowerasing to the dnf upgrade option.
I just upgraded some systems, and it seemed that fc31 had some newer
versions of packages than the fc32, and they had to be downgraded for
the update to go thru. You could
On 9/2/20 1:38 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
You seem to have a lot of non-Fedora repos enabled. For example
Adobe Systems Incorporated
Fedora 31 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
This is actually a Fedora supplied repo config.
google-chrome
etc.
I'd remove the packages which comes from these repos
On 2020-09-02 23:23, Jeremy Nicoll - ml fedora wrote:
On 2020-09-02 17:12, bruce wrote:
Hi Jeremy.
Doing a "view source" only shows the static source. To get the dynamic
gnerated content from the avascript you need to dive into the
Developers Tools/Inspector tab.
Might not the problem be
On 2 Sep 2020 at 13:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:10:28 -0500
From: Ranjan Maitra
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails
Organization: Mailbox
Hi Fedora users (FYI to rpmconf maintainer),
Several years ago, I wrote a little tool to help automate a three-way
merge of RPM-managed configuration files after package upgrades. This
has been a sore omission from Fedora for years:
On 2020-09-02 17:12, bruce wrote:
Hi Jeremy.
Doing a "view source" only shows the static source. To get the dynamic
gnerated content from the avascript you need to dive into the
Developers Tools/Inspector tab.
Might not the problem be that what you're hoping to see is html
corresponding to
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:38:14 +0200 Andras Simon wrote:
> 2020-09-02 20:10 UTC+02:00, Ranjan Maitra :
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> >> Have you installed any packages from outside Fedora's repos?
> >
> > I don't know the answer: a student who knows quite a bit about
2020-09-02 20:10 UTC+02:00, Ranjan Maitra :
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> Have you installed any packages from outside Fedora's repos?
>
> I don't know the answer: a student who knows quite a bit about Fedora used
> to use it. But it has never been a problem to
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 9/2/20 9:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > $ sudo dnf distro-sync
> > Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM
> > CDT.
> > Error:
> > Problem: The operation would result in removing the following
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:57:38 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> I'm using KDE. Brave causes no problems except for breaking maybe one
> Web site in twenty or twenty-five. But that's not a Fedora or KDE problem.
>
> Temlakos
Also on KDE, Fedora 32, brave-browser-1.13.82-1.x86_64. No problem with
the URL
On 9/2/20 11:15 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Fedora32, x64
> Xfce 4.14
> brave-browser-1.13.82-1.x86_64
>
> When I open Brave Browser and go to
>
> http://squall.sfsu.edu/gif/jetstream_pac_init_00.gif
> (other pages too)
>
> five seconds later, I get kicked all the way out of Xfce and
On 9/2/20 9:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
$ sudo dnf distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM CDT.
Error:
Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
packages: dnf, systemd, systemd-udev
(try to add '--skip-broken' to
So, I have been trying to upgrade this fully updated f31 machine on the CLI. I
have tried the following:
$ sudo dnf --refresh upgrade
Adobe Systems Incorporated 17 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
Fedora 31 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_646.6 kB/s | 986 B 00:00
Fedora
On 2020-09-01 21:30, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/1/20 5:23 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Well then the next thing I will do is see how the F8 key code changes
when Fn is pressed. It did not occur to me, I just expected Fn to be
another key code which it seems it is not. /If it will retain the
present
Hello all, is the "For only this specific display arrangement" in the KDE
Plasma spin of F32 actually functional? I have 15" HiDPI laptop that I dock
with a Thunderbolt dock to a non-HiDPI external display. Since this machine has
an nVidia card (not my first choice just what I ended up with)
Hi Jeremy.
Doing a "view source" only shows the static source. To get the dynamic
gnerated content from the avascript you need to dive into the
Developers Tools/Inspector tab.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:26 AM Jeremy Nicoll - ml fedora
wrote:
>
> On 2020-09-02 10:50, bruce wrote:
>
> > All of this
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 09:16 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> In this forum and others, a lot of time and effort goes to dealing
> with hardware support. When you buy a macOS or Windows system, you
> don't expect problems getting the hardware to work.
I do... I expect problems with Windows
Fedora32, x64
Xfce 4.14
brave-browser-1.13.82-1.x86_64
When I open Brave Browser and go to
http://squall.sfsu.edu/gif/jetstream_pac_init_00.gif
(other pages too)
five seconds later, I get kicked all the way out of Xfce and back to my
lightdm logon dialog.
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 16:29, ITwrx wrote:
> On 9/1/20 1:31 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > The devs seem amenable, but are vastly under-resourced IMO. For my
> money,
better Fedora support ==> more Redhat support contract adoption.
> >
> > But that's a corporate Redhat/IBM issue that they've yet to
On 2020-09-02 10:50, bruce wrote:
All of this seems to work. However, in the Inspector window, I cant
figure out how to "expand" all the nodes to see the complete html of
the generated page.
On the page itself - either the normal page view or the top part of
the tools window - riht-click the
Hi.
A few weeks ago someone posted an off-topic thread about scraping
javascript/dynamic sites. Sorry to say, I've got a similar off-topic
post.
If this is unacceptable, let me know and I'll delete the thread.
I'm dealing with the results of a url/site that has javascript. I had
thought I could
24 matches
Mail list logo
