Re: Strange compress behavior under /usr

2021-05-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:58 AM Qiyu Yan wrote: > > Dear folks, > > My problem is that new file created at /usr won't be compressed. > > I accenticly that none of my files under /usr is compressed[1], so I > tried to run `sudo btrfs fi def -czstd -v -r /usr` to compress them, > that seems to work.

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Ed Greshko
On 13/05/2021 04:05, Roger Heflin wrote: Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. Yes, that would be very helpful if Robert would supply that information. Thanks for making that suggestion. -- Remind me to ignore com

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Roger Heflin
Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 13/05/2021 01:08, Robert McBroom via users wrote: > > On 5/12/21 12:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: > >> On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Ro

Re: puzzling SELinux alert. [SOLVED]

2021-05-12 Thread home user
On 5/11/21 2:05 PM, Eddie O'Connor wrote: I'm wondering?the ugrade/patches fixed it?would it have been fixed "sooner" if you had run the dnf upgrade sooner? or was it the "latest" upgrade/patch that did it?... On Tue, May 11, 2021, 12:35 PM home user > wro

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Ed Greshko
On 13/05/2021 01:08, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/12/21 12:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 Trying this one ping fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 ping6

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/12/21 12:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 Trying this one ping fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 ping6 ___ Same on f33, but bo

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Mike Wright
On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 Trying this one ping fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 ping6 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an access point to have a sufficient number of ethernet ports. I can't ping it using the ipv4 address I see on the router. There are two i

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/11/21 9:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/05/2021 20:40, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 1:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/05/2021 12:52, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an acces

Evince sendto (share) button greyed out

2021-05-12 Thread Anca, Tibor
Hello, since the switch to Fedora 40 I notice this odd change, that neither nautilus context menu (Sendto entry missing), nor evince share/ sendto button work. The latter doesn't work at all which makes things unnecessary complicated. I understand that the package nautilus-sendto has been integra