On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 23:31:48 +0100 Barry wrote:
>> Try that (for the running kernel):
>> dnf remove kmod-nvidia-$(uname -r)
>> akmods --akmod nvidia
> As I said that does not work because the already built modules are not
> Deleted.
They are since akmod packages the modules in the
On 6/16/22 01:02, andreas.fourn...@runbox.com wrote:
I hope it isn't too much off-topic to solicit advice on what to get so
that it would work flawlessly with Fedora. I'm looking for a rather
basic model. When I browse the homepages of manufacturers I can't find
any mention of support for Linux.
Tim:
>> Joking aside, Hewlett Packard, Brother, and Canon, to name just
>> three brands that frequently sell printers and scanners that can be
>> used with Linux.
George N. White III:
> Read the software licenses before purchase. Vendors have been
> moving to licenses that assume no
On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 10:54 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> If I come back to use my computer and hit a key at exactly the same
> time as the screen decides to blank (I don't use screensavers) then
> the screen does blank, but no key or mouse activity (I've tried) will
> cause the screen to wake up
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 8:55 PM Robert McBroom via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 6/18/22 20:10, Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 7:34 PM Robert McBroom via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/2/22 09:08, stan via users wrote:
>> > On Wed,
On 6/18/22 20:10, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 7:34 PM Robert McBroom via users
wrote:
On 6/2/22 09:08, stan via users wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:54:50 -0400
> Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>> I just had it again, it's very rare.
>> And it's happened over the
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 8:33 PM Robert McBroom via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Trying to use rEFInd for a multiboot system. It starts with the graphic
> screen but only shows the logo. stays there forever. Didn't find a
> questions list. Can boot with supergrub2 but it has
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 7:34 PM Robert McBroom via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 6/2/22 09:08, stan via users wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:54:50 -0400
> > Fulko Hew wrote:
> >
> >> I just had it again, it's very rare.
> >> And it's happened over the last number of Fedora
On 6/2/22 09:08, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:54:50 -0400
Fulko Hew wrote:
I just had it again, it's very rare.
And it's happened over the last number of Fedora versions (-1 to -n)
If I come back to use my computer and hit a key at exactly the same
time as the screen decides
Trying to use rEFInd for a multiboot system. It starts with the graphic
screen but only shows the logo. stays there forever. Didn't find a
questions list. Can boot with supergrub2 but it has warts as well and
see little activity for some time.
Idesa would be appreciated
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 5:53 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 10:02 +0200, andreas.fourn...@runbox.com wrote:
> > I hope it isn't too much off-topic to solicit advice on what to get
> > so that it would work flawlessly with Fedora. I'm looking for a
> > rather basic model. When I
> On 18 Jun 2022, at 15:13, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>
>
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:39:14 -0500 Anil F Duggirala wrote:
>>> My guess is that your system has not built new nvidia Kmods since you
>>> added the signing key.
>
>>> You will need to force the mod to be rebuilt so
> On 18 Jun 2022, at 12:39, Anil F Duggirala wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 08:07 +0100, Barry wrote:
>>
>> Two things. The people working on this are on the rpmfusion lists you
>> might want to ask for information there.
It’s alive, but the people you need to respond are busy.
>
>
On 6/18/22 02:20, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> What is the misconfiguration that you are saying I have?
Using "-all" or "~all" in your SPF configuration. They are saying
"reject mail whose last hop source IP isn't explicitly authorized",
with "~all" being less strict but any receiver is
On 6/18/22 01:07, Barry wrote:
You will need to force the mod to be rebuilt so that is signed.
I do not know what the reliable way to do the rebuild is.
I don't use nVidia anymore, but if memory serves, you use --force for that.
___
users mailing
On 6/18/22 09:23, Mike Wright wrote:
mailserver's domain:
hostisimo.com. TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.example.com"
a subdomain:
nospam.hostisimo.com. TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.example.com"
CORRECTION: (replaceing example.com with hostisimo.com)
mailserver's domain:
On 6/17/22 07:56, Thomas Cameron wrote:
I have set up spf, dmarc, and dkim for my email domain. It *seems* to
work well. I tested it by sending an email to my GMail account. When I
look at the headers of the email, GMail says that it passes all three
tests:
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
Hi.
On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:39:14 -0500 Anil F Duggirala wrote:
>> My guess is that your system has not built new nvidia Kmods since you
>> added the signing key.
>> You will need to force the mod to be rebuilt so that is signed.
>> I do not know what the reliable way to do the rebuild is.
>
On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 08:07 +0100, Barry wrote:
>
> Two things. The people working on this are on the rpmfusion lists you
> might want to ask for information there.
Thanks for your response Barry. I just sent an email
to rpmfusion-us...@lists.rpmfusion.org , but it seems like that list is
dead.
On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 11:39 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> System-wide ISP systems are able better than personal spam detection
> systems. In the sense that an ISP gets thousands of emails, and when
> scads of identical spam hit their server, it can be flagged and
> deleted
> as spam. This is
Thomas Cameron writes:
> But my point is, setting up spf works as expected. I've verified it via
> my emails to known correctly configured mail servers like GMail. What I
> don't understand is why, when it is apparently set up correctly, are
> there mail servers which throw errors when I
> On 17 Jun 2022, at 20:16, Anil F Duggirala wrote:
>
> So now I have noticed at boot time I am getting a message about "NVIDIA
> kernel module missing, falling back to Nouveau".
> I think I have Secure Boot enabled, could this be why it didn't work?
> I have now followed the instructions
22 matches
Mail list logo
