You would have to run "make menuconfig" and update the config file
used in the source rpm.
The config file controls what modules and/or other drivers get
compiled, if you did not change the config file none of the add-ons
would get compiled.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 6:43 PM Sharpened Blade via use
I can get the kernel to build from the vanilla sources in the method you
outlined, I want to make it an RPM to distribute it in a repo. I am using
fedoras spec file because I want it to be as much of a drop in replacement of
the normal kernel possible.
___
On 9/2/22 16:56, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 9/2/22 14:11, Felix Miata wrote:
It doesn't have to use only Radeon drivers. Try removing the
ATI/Radeon Xorg
driver rpm (xorg-x11-drv-ati). That will cause it to fallback to the
newer
technology, upstream default, "modesetting" DIX display driver, along
On 9/2/22 15:05, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 9/2/22 13:46, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
Hey, Ian! Good to see you, hope you're well!
Same here! (IIRC, you were the person who recommended the FirePro V4900
to me back in the day.)
I think that's right! I loved mine, and it lasted for a LONG time.
On 9/2/22 14:11, Felix Miata wrote:
It doesn't have to use only Radeon drivers. Try removing the ATI/Radeon Xorg
driver rpm (xorg-x11-drv-ati). That will cause it to fallback to the newer
technology, upstream default, "modesetting" DIX display driver, along with the
radeon kernel driver, and I th
On 9/2/22 13:55, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
I am not sure the issue you are seeing is 100% related to the video card
or old driver. It's worse on the Ubuntu/Intel machine but I definitely
also see it on the Fedora/NVidia machine with Thunderbird.
Aargh! That's no fun.
--
===
On 9/2/22 13:46, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
Hey, Ian! Good to see you, hope you're well!
Same here! (IIRC, you were the person who recommended the FirePro V4900
to me back in the day.)
Are you using DVI monitors? The RX550 will do what you need, but the WX
2100, 3100, or 3200 will all d
Ian Pilcher composed on 2022-09-02 11:44 (UTC-0500):
> I'm currently using an old ATI FirePro V4900 to run my 3 displays -
> 1x 2K and 2x 1920x1200. I've been seeing glitches in some Gtk
> applications for a while now (running on Plasma X11), and I'm getting
> pretty tired of them.[1] This card
On 9/2/22 11:44, Ian Pilcher wrote:
[1] The glitch takes the form of the contents of new windows not being
shown, only the frame. It only seems to happen with Gtk apps,
primarily Thunderbird. I've tried futzing around with the Xorg
acceleration settings, and I've been able to reduce
On 9/2/22 11:44, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I'm currently using an old ATI FirePro V4900 to run my 3 displays -
1x 2K and 2x 1920x1200. I've been seeing glitches in some Gtk
applications for a while now (running on Plasma X11), and I'm getting
pretty tired of them.[1] This card uses the old radeon driv
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 11:47 AM Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm currently using an old ATI FirePro V4900 to run my 3 displays -
> 1x 2K and 2x 1920x1200. I've been seeing glitches in some Gtk
> applications for a while now (running on Plasma X11), and I'm getting
> pretty tired of them.[1] This card u
I'm currently using an old ATI FirePro V4900 to run my 3 displays -
1x 2K and 2x 1920x1200. I've been seeing glitches in some Gtk
applications for a while now (running on Plasma X11), and I'm getting
pretty tired of them.[1] This card uses the old radeon driver, so I'm
thinking that it might be
You would have to change the correct config options. make menuconfig
used to bring up the interface for that and then you need to figure
out which corner of the menu your modules are hiding. the rpmbuild
is going to be very hardwired to make it harder to do what you are
wanting to do.
When doi
On 8/28/22 3:25 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received
thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The
process is shown as running with 100% CPU
PID USER PR NI
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 12:55 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I mark the spam folder to only show unread messages. This way I see what was
> added
> before marking all as read (after unJunking any mistakes).
That kind of thing's a pet hate of mine. On usenet (newsgroups), the
clients had an IGNORE
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 06:54 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> > The first hit is from 20 years ago and basically says "don't worry
> > about it" while referring to a man page I don't understand.
> >
>
> Search engines curate results depending on your search history
> (my wife and I get complete
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 09:45 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
> > On 1 Sep 2022, at 22:42, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> >
> > The first hit is from 20 years ago and basically says "don't worry
> > about it" while referring to a man page I don't understand.
>
> Maybe post your subscriptions.con
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 6:42 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 18:00 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 1 Sep 2022, at 11:20, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second):
> > >
> > > Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[
> On 1 Sep 2022, at 22:42, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> The first hit is from 20 years ago and basically says "don't worry
> about it" while referring to a man page I don't understand.
Maybe post your subscriptions.conf and see if someone does know what it means?
That first post seems to im
19 matches
Mail list logo
