On 12/28/2022 6:34 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:20:57 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
Just because they are a cache doesn't mean they are necessarily safe to
delete while running. Most applications take care of managing their
cache files.
I used to try and deal with avoiding
On 25/12/22 00:11, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
You could use the file, less, cat, or hexdump commands. "file"
would try to identify it, the others will just show you the
contents for you to try and identify it.
If it's zero bytes in size, the system is probably just using the
name of the file,
On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:20:57 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Just because they are a cache doesn't mean they are necessarily safe to
> delete while running. Most applications take care of managing their
> cache files.
I used to try and deal with avoiding backups of "unimportant" stuff
until I
On 12/28/22 14:45, Bill Cunningham wrote:
What files are basically safe to remove because they are caches and
such? There is the invisible file .cache. And the /var/cache. The files
in /tmp are these safe to delete? Are there any other files you can
delete? For example if you were using rsync,
What files are basically safe to remove because they are caches and
such? There is the invisible file .cache. And the /var/cache. The files
in /tmp are these safe to delete? Are there any other files you can
delete? For example if you were using rsync, what file would you not
want to backup,
On 12/28/2022 02:41 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Just for info, the mounting of the removable device under
/run/media/ is not Gnome specific it is also done that way under
KDE, so from that I would assume it is system wide.
Xfce as well.
___
users
On 28/12/22 12:43, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
It looks like if you add it to /etc/fstab, then Gnome auto-mounting
won't touch it.
Confirmed! Works like a charm, thank you very much!
Just for info, the mounting of the removable device under
/run/media/ is not Gnome specific it is also done
On Wed, 2022-12-28 at 12:03 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:54 AM Andreas Fournier
> wrote:
> >
> > I thought it would be time to give Fedora 37 a test, so in Gnome
> > Software I initiated the upgrade. It downloaded a lot of stuff and
> > when
> > that was done I
On 28/12/2022 16:38, George N. White III wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:48 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
Time to install Fedora37 and on what?
I have a Lenovo x140e upgraded with 16Gb mem (even though spec
says 8Gb
max) and 500GB SSD, but I am looking for something perhaps
I was bought a ThinkPad x250 for keep a little screen unfortunately this isn't
for handyman because I had a IBM for it add-in card becoming too much older
after the lose of the family of processors i386
Dorian Rosse.
From: George N. White III
Sent: Wednesday,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:54 AM Andreas Fournier
wrote:
>
> I thought it would be time to give Fedora 37 a test, so in Gnome
> Software I initiated the upgrade. It downloaded a lot of stuff and when
> that was done I pressed on the 'Restart & Upgrade' button. Then I got a
> popup that I had
I thought it would be time to give Fedora 37 a test, so in Gnome
Software I initiated the upgrade. It downloaded a lot of stuff and when
that was done I pressed on the 'Restart & Upgrade' button. Then I got a
popup that I had incompatible software, the python3-argh package. I
thought I would just
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:48 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> Time to install Fedora37 and on what?
>
> I have a Lenovo x140e upgraded with 16Gb mem (even though spec says 8Gb
> max) and 500GB SSD, but I am looking for something perhaps newer and
> perhaps won't hang at times.
>
> Requirements are:
13 matches
Mail list logo
