On 09/24/2023 11:33 PM, Dave Close wrote:
And I've probably used computers longer than most of us, having started
with an IBM 7094 and an 029 keypunch.
IBM 1620 mod 2 and 029 keypunch here.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I wrote:
> I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
> Wayland session.
Tim via users wrote:
>I don't really see the advantage
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:04 AM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 21:12 -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> > I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> > (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> > startx command. But I haven't found an
I asked:
> I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
> Wayland session.
>
> An old post on this list suggests using
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 21:12 -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
> (old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
> startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
> Wayland session.
I don't
On 9/24/23 21:12, Dave Close wrote:
I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
(old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
Wayland session.
An old post on this list suggests
I detest a graphical login and insist on running in multi-user mode
(old runlevel 3). To start an X11 session after login, I can use the
startx command. But I haven't found an equivalent command to start a
Wayland session.
An old post on this list suggests using weston-launch. But dnf says
there
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 15:44 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> Perhaps someone created a partition table on the device, but then
> wrote a FAT32 filesystem to the raw device, and the bits on the only
> filesystem look close enough like filesystem entries to confuse
> tools?
If someone uses more
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 07:40 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Partition types are rather meaningless. They are there and everyone
> seems to set it, but when wrong it does not seem to matter. At best
> it is information that is sometimes right.
>
> I have not seen that the partition type has to have
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 06:43 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> I don't find any bulletin board software in the fedora repositories. So
> you would have to download the source from the above source repository,
> and build it locally, installing it in /usr/local.
>
> Maybe my search fu is lacking, and
On 9/24/23 15:54, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am currently on F38, but the other day when I was searching for
how to do something (which I've forgotten what it was) I found
instructions for F39 and F40. So I'm now curious as to what is the
current stable version of Fedora?
rpmfusion maybe?
Hi,
I am currently on F38, but the other day when I was searching for
how to do something (which I've forgotten what it was) I found
instructions for F39 and F40. So I'm now curious as to what is the
current stable version of Fedora?
regards,
Steve
OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 07:24:11PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Subject: Re: Partition Type
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:23 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to mount these partitions?
No idea, because the output below doesn't tell me very much. What tool
did you give the
On 9/24/23 10:24, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Subject: Re: Partition Type
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:23 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to mount these partitions?
Disk /dev/sdc: 3.83 MiB, 4014080 bytes, 7840 sectors
Disk model: Mass Storage
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> On Sep 24, 2023, at 13:24, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Actually /dev/sdc2 is mount ls /run/media/user
> Sorry, this is wrong
> /dev/sdc on /run/media/user/Data Logger type vfat
>
On 9/24/2023 1:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
...
It seems that sdc4 is bootable
The sizes seem bizarre
Partition types are rather meaningless. They are there and everyone
seems to set it, but when wrong it does not seem to matter. At best
it is information that is sometimes right.
I have
> Subject: Re: Partition Type
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:23 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a way to mount these partitions?
> >
> > Disk /dev/sdc: 3.83 MiB, 4014080 bytes, 7840 sectors
> > Disk model: Mass Storage
> > Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> > Sector
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 16:32 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:31:47AM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 00:48 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > untrimmed messages be really unnerving ... I mean, it seems to be
> > > a
> > > known fact that
On 9/24/23 01:22, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Is there a way to mount these partitions?
Disk /dev/sdc: 3.83 MiB, 4014080 bytes, 7840 sectors
Disk model: Mass Storage
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:31:47AM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 00:48 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
untrimmed messages be really unnerving ... I mean, it seems to be a
known fact that lots of people, especially in the computer world,
can't seem to think and write
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 22:57:10 -0400
Fulko Hew wrote:
> Can someone point me to instructions for installing phpBB
> and/or recommend a bulletin board system to run on Fedora?
https://github.com/phpbb/
I don't find any bulletin board software in the fedora repositories. So
you would have to
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:45:41 -0500
steven stern wrote:
> I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
> been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
>
> https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
Not the package
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:23 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to mount these partitions?
>
> Disk /dev/sdc: 3.83 MiB, 4014080 bytes, 7840 sectors
> Disk model: Mass Storage
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 00:48 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> untrimmed messages be really unnerving ... I mean, it seems to be a
> known fact that lots of people, especially in the computer world,
> can't seem to think and write "in complete thoughts with context"
> (Nick Holland), thus being
Hello,
Is there a way to mount these partitions?
Disk /dev/sdc: 3.83 MiB, 4014080 bytes, 7840 sectors
Disk model: Mass Storage
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
25 matches
Mail list logo
