On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 21:02 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> You are having far too many problems with too many programs. The
> common fixes are not helping.
Remembering tales from long ago - how updating an OS often seemed to
induce faults in hardware that was apparently working fine before.
On 11/24/23 17:40, Michael Hennebry wrote:
More joy of a recent upgrade.
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:05 ago on Fri 24 Nov 2023 07:29:43
PM CST.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package libswscale-free-6.0-5.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 from
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:57 PM Michael Hennebry
wrote:
>
> chromium is freezing on me now, too.
> journalctl -r -g romium
> does not reveal any errors or warnings.
>
> --
> Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
> "His longhand was fairly good in his youth, but as he got older it got
>
chromium is freezing on me now, too.
journalctl -r -g romium
does not reveal any errors or warnings.
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"His longhand was fairly good in his youth, but as he got older it got
smaller, more scribbly, and harder to read; although, like being hanged,
one
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:40:05 -0600 (CST)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Suggestions?
This is fedora putting their own lame bits of ffmpeg in fedora. This
works for me:
dnf swap ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allowerasing
that swaps out the lame fedora stuff and gets everything from rpmfusion.
--
More joy of a recent upgrade.
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:05 ago on Fri 24 Nov 2023 07:29:43 PM CST.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package libswscale-free-6.0-5.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free conflicts with
libswscale-free provided
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, Roger Heflin wrote:
A profile (for a browser) is where you bookmarks/cookies/cache and
other associated stuff needed exist.
You can typically (on most browsers) have more than one profile.
If you aren't running chromium currently then you delete the files.
You might do a
A profile (for a browser) is where you bookmarks/cookies/cache and
other associated stuff needed exist.
You can typically (on most browsers) have more than one profile.
If you aren't running chromium currently then you delete the files.
You might do a "ps -elf | grep -i chromium" and make sure
On 11/24/23 14:43, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I realize 127.0.0.1 is my computer,
but I'm not clear on how 127.0.053 and 127.0.0.53#53 are used.
All addresses from 127.0.0.0 to 127.255.255.255 are on your machine.
They are called loopback addresses (because they loop back to you).
Usually the
OOn Fri, 24 Nov 2023, Roger Heflin wrote:
It means likely it crashed while it had the profile locked and the
program is too stupid to reclaim the lost lock.
So while did it fail the first time?
That seems to be a really common bug in a lot of programs. They test
the lock/unlock and make
I have seen the bug in old code that a new compiler
optimization/library fix exposed.
I have seen code unload a loadable library and then turn around and
call a function in the unloaded library (it worked since the unload
was a NOOP), but broke when the vendor removed/fixed the NOOP and
made the
It means likely it crashed while it had the profile locked and the
program is too stupid to reclaim the lost lock.
That seems to be a really common bug in a lot of programs. They test
the lock/unlock and make sure other separate copies won't use the
profile when another process is using it, but
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Restart you computer and try again. Let us know
shutdown /r /f /t 00
Did that. Didn't help.
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"I was just thinking about the life of a pumpkin. Grow up in the sun,
happily entwined with others,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I'm saying it wasn't a memory thing. Here are some example lines that I saw.
They were all together at the time that firefox was stuck.
rtkit-daemon[1090]: Successfully made thread 7825 of process 6769
(/usr/lib64/firefox/firefox) owned by '1000' RT
On 11/23/23 8:00 PM, home user wrote:
I would like to run a memory test. Does what Fedora offers now work? I recall
from a previous thread that it does not. If it does, please remind me how to
install it.
It's memtest86+.
It's on my work station, accessed during boot-up via the grub
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:03:14 -0600
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is OT, but someone here might know the answer to this.
>
> So, I like the ability to highlight with my mouse left button, and
> paste with my middle (scroll) button. It works on `xterm` but not
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
