On 01.06.2015, Joachim Backes wrote:
Anybody has similar problems?
Could be a permission problem. You could try an udev rule to set it
accordingly. Put this in a file under /etc/udev/rules.d:
SUBSYSTEM==usb, ATTR{idVendor}==04a9, ATTR{idProduct}==220e, MODE=0666
--
users mailing list
On 30.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I will be getting back to the vendor and try to get my money back.
Before you do, would you mind posting the output of
lsusb -v -d 0e8d:7610
and the last ~15 lines of the dmesg output after plugging in the
device and having done a dmesg --clear prior to that.
On 29.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
[ 192.473984] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
This is the RT2860 chipset, and not an RT55xx.
AFAIK, it's not yet supported.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 27.05.2015, David Cary Hart wrote:
[]
1. Never upgrade the day a new major version is released. Wait at
least two or three weeks. Let others encounter and report the
showstoppers, and give the developers appropriate time to fix them.
2. Restore your backup.
Baaah! :-)
--
users
Hi,
latest Fedora Firefox supports these ciphers:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 128 Bit
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bit
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA 128 Bit
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA 128 Bit
ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bit
DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA 128 Bit
DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA 256 Bit
RSA-AES128-SHA 128 Bit
On 16.05.2015, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I have an micro SD card that has turned read only. I have been trying
everything I can find to clear it for several hours.
Time to backup your data and to buy a new one. This happens when your SD card
is gone bad. There's no way to
On 14.05.2015, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
The OP hasn't bought it yet :)
Hell, you're right! Sorry :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 14.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
Can you please post the output of lsusb -v for this adapter?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 13.05.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
You can only wait for a few more weeks while the alternative
pdf-stapler is approved.
Or you can use poppler-utils, and you could also install F19 (the latest Fedora
with a working
pdftk) on an USB stick. That's what I did to tailor my documents. It's
On 11.05.2015, Rolf Turner wrote:
The seeming necessity for upgrading arises from a pressing need to upgrade
R to version 3.2.0. When I try to build this version I get a load of
error messages (basically coming from gcc I think) like unto:
connections.o: In function `gzcon_write':
On 11.05.2015, Rolf Turner wrote:
I am currently running Fedora 17. Which is of course antediluvian. But
everything I have seen on this list with respect to upgrading terrifies me.
Disasters seem to lurk everywhere and I haven't the skills to cope with
disasters.
Fedora upgrade mostly
On 04.05.2015, stan wrote:
I don't see a defense against such exploits as long as people can
install software on their systems. The alternative is Mac on steroids,
only the software that big brother approves of and allows you to use.
The choice is yours. Either you stick with straight
On 02.05.2015, Manfred Lotz wrote:
I even don't know if adding a resume statement is something which
should be done automatically.
It should, when formatting a partition as swap or when detecting swap-space on
installation. But that's not the main problem why hibernation isn't working
On 21.04.2015, sean darcy wrote:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.login1.SleepVerbNotSupported: Sleep verb not
supported
Is your swap page big enough and enabled?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 21.04.2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Is your swap page big enough and enabled?
s/page/partition;
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On 20.04.2015, stan wrote:
Maybe this will help?
http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
Been there, done that. Without any success.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 20.04.2015, Richard Hughes wrote:
Writing a 16GB file to swap takes forever
In my case (16GB RAM) it takes about 4 secs. Only memory actually in use gets
dumped. Page cache and bros. are discarded and buffers are flushed before
compressing the memory content.
and most hardware can go days
On 20.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
Even without modification, it does not work.
What you need is somebody who lives in Germany and could make a copy for you,
or a non-transparent proxy. Most of the free proxies are transparent and expose
thus your original IP to the web server, which isn't what you
On 18.04.2015, Pete Travis wrote:
Do consider the audience you sent this mail to, though.
It isn't the power management subsystem developer community..
This is what I have been recommended to do after reporting a S2D bug on the
Linux
kernel bugzilla:
Posting to the PM mailing list should be
On 19.04.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
OK, if you see my post, F is now (since F20) designed by default to not
resume from hibernate.
Now, THAT would be interesting to know what exactly has been done to achieve
this behaviour!
In my case, the machine resumes just fine from S2D about 6 times out
On 19.04.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Btw, do you have this issue with CentOS (they run 3.10 kernels).
The problem occurs with the latest Fedora kernels as well as with vanilla
3.19.x and 4.0.0. I'm on F21 on this machine (XFCE spin).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 19.04.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
When did it start. For me, my problems started with kernel 3.16 or so
(and that too, only on some machines).
On my Asus Laptop, both S2R and S2D has been working flawlessly ever since
(running Arch) - both with old and new kernels. On my PC, S2R works, but
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
Does S2R work for you?
Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months, and my gut feel
says you're most probably right. The
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
So, use maxcpus=1 during first boot and 2nd boot?
The machine is a quadcore XEON, reducing it to a single-core is not really
something I want.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
It simply doesn't work..
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going to apply only until your
frozen system
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I hibernated and next day I powered up.
My previous session was not restored;
i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to
start all the apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
--
users mailing list
On 13.04.2015, Adel ESSAFI wrote:
Could some one tell me what are the partitions that should necessary be
installed on the main hard disk on which Linux is installed ? i,e, that
should not be placed on a mountable partition!
While others may have sustantially different opinions:
you should
On 13.04.2015, Tim wrote:
Is the second one (efi) actually a partition, or just a directory
inside /boot?
It is a partition of its own, and must be FAT formatted.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 09.04.2015, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
To me this looks as if port forwarding is all-right but Postfix does not
react (?!?)
Take a look into the postfix log.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 09.04.2015, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
but I can't receive mails from outside.
Do you have any DNS-record for your machine, is it reachable from the outside
world? If yes, you'll most likely have to forward the mail-port (usually 25) to
the internal IP your mailserver is listening on, as
On 09.04.2015, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
I have some old laptop running debian. Can I do something with it - without
setting up another mail server on it? :-)
Yes. Take it with you to a friend and run a tcptraceroute to your mailserver.
It will tell you exactly where it stops.
--
users
On 07.04.2015, Tim wrote:
Personally, I hate webforums, they're so chaotic and cumbersome to use.
I participate in around a dozen mailing lists, and I can do that because
messages come to me. I couldn't do anything like that if I had to visit
a dozen different websites.
I'd like to second
On 21.03.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
OK it's a little annoying when you provide so little information from
the very start about what you're trying to do, and what the setup is,
Here's what lsblk says before formatting:
AME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
sda
On 20.03.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
If /dev/sda uses MBR, it doesn't really have a UUID, it might have a
serial number.
It's MBR, and it didn't have a UUID before.
I think think needs more troubleshooting, rather
than bringing out the hammer before the problem is identified.
Feel free to
On 21.03.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
OK I think I found the problem. The Fedora kernel doesn't come with
nilfs2 kernel module. At least, a default Fedora 22 installation
doesn't include it.
I don't use any distribution kernel. My kernel has nilfs2 - definitely.
A manual mount works perfectly,
On 21.03.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
I don't think systemd has any concept of filesystems (volume formats).
It gets all of this from libblkid, udev, and the kernel. So I'd say
one of those three things is confused, and then confuses everything
else.
Didn't have much time today to further
On 21.03.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
OK it's a little annoying when you provide so little information from
the very start about what you're trying to do, and what the setup is,
and now you're not even using a Fedora kernel.
My original posting was kinda sort of does this ring a bell?.
On 20.03.2015, jd1008 wrote:
uuid is the way to go!!!
But not on the top-level physical device. No way in h*ll should /dev/sda have
any UUID. What happened was that systemd tried to mount /dev/sda on /home
rather than /dev/sda4, which of course can't work..
--
users mailing list
On 20.03.2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Looks like a serious problem with nilfs-tools.
s/tools/utils;
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
Hi,
F21, fully updated, no longer boots cleanly. After to tries, I found the
culprit:
suddenly, the physical device (/dev/sda) has got a UUID, and it's the same as
the one /home has. So no wonder that /home can't be mounted. I have not the
slightest clue what could have given /dev/sda a UUID.
On 20.03.2015, Ron Morse wrote:
I don't know about removing a UUID, but you can assign a new one with
GParted.
Yes. But I was curious what could have assigned a UUID to /dev/sda. And I found
it. Making a nilfs2 partition on /home the evening before, lsblk -f reported
the same UUID for
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
How do you remove the old kernels so that they don't pile
up indefinitely? Manually?
Yes. Just delete the related files in /boot and the sourcetree in /usr/src.
Or does this automatically replace the last
version that was compiled and installed this way?
No.
On 18.03.2015, Tom H wrote:
You don't need to run make as root.
Yes, as I already stated. Only the install of the modules and the kernel itself
has to be done as root.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
Heinz, what does cat /proc/cgroups show?
[htd@chiara ~]$ cat /proc/cgroups
#subsys_namehierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 2 1 1
memory 3 1 1
devices 4 74 1
freezer 5 1 1
net_cls 6 1 1
blkio
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
An afterthought. I notice that you are compiling the kernel as root. I
do my build in the rpmbuild system as a user, so the compile is run as a
user. Do you think that would matter?
For the kernel to get properly installed, you have to be root. Precisely, there
On 18.03.2015, stan wrote:
Would you be willing to give a recipe that you use?
i.e. what steps do you perform to do this?
1. Download a kernel tarball from kernel.org
2. Unpack it into /usr/src
3. Copy .config from the latest Fedora kernel into the kernel toplevel
sourcedir (it is stored
On 17.03.2015, Tom H wrote:
I don't know what the difference is between not compiling cgroup
suppport into the kernel and compiling it in but disabling all
controllers but it looks like that your assumption that cgroup support
isn't required is wrong.
Thanks for pinting this out!
You are
On 17.03.2015, stan wrote:
Lucky you!
Lucky? The machine was fully unusable.
Are you using F21? Which kernel?
Yes, this machine is on F21.
[htd@chiara ~]$ uname -a
Linux chiara.fritha.org 3.19.2-rc1-bfq #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 16 16:16:07 CET
2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
It's a
On 17.03.2015, stan wrote:
I think cgroups are integrated into Fedora, and so the CFS with
cgroup is required. Thus, BFS will probably not work in Fedora,
as it has no support for cgroups.
CFS is not required at all, and so are cgroups. Any kernel with the BFS patch
applied will run just
On 09.03.2015, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point to a
unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of them.
Curious what would happen, I remembered this mail when compiling a new kernel
today. A nice -n 19 make -j
On 12.03.2015, stan wrote:
When I build firefox nightly with -j6, just at the end of the export
phase, and before the compile starts, I see all 6 cores maxed out.
Once the compile starts, it is back to a single core equivalent. The
Gentoo users seemed to suggest that this was a flaw in the
On 12.03.2015, stan wrote:
So, cgroups seem like another dead end.
It depends on the machine used and the amount of processes.
While cgroups limit more than just CPU power, you could
try with BFS (which does not use cgroups).
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/3.0/3.19/
--
users mailing list
On 11.03.2015, stan wrote:
What is the point of -j6 or -j8 if the make
can't spawn additional processes with their own limits, and thus take
advantage of more resources that are available?
The point is simply that you can exactly determine how many processes should be
used.
What is it that
On 10.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I would always encourage separate physical disks as backup partitions.
If the OP has flaky power, maybe having them offline when not in use,
would also be a good idea.
I second that, this is a very important advice!
In addition, use a good lightning protector
On 11.03.2015, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
I am not sure if 1 TB is enough for use Windows and Fedora.
It is more than enough.
I encountered a problem also trying to run on this computer the
SystemRescueCd
Choose an alternative kernel when booting sysresccd.
--
users mailing list
On 11.03.2015, stan wrote:
I don't see why this is necessary. The system is showing 470%
idle. So the kernel cpu scheduler shouldn't need to limit the job to a
single core maximum usage.
I just tried a simple make on an 8-core machine. There was exactly one
compile process, and it's 100%
On 09.03.2015, stan wrote:
But, when I run a compile job with -j6, in order to allow all six cores
to be used, it limits the total amount of usage to 100% of a *single*
core. So, it might use all six cores, but the sum of the percentages
on those six cores is always around 100% of one core.
On 10.03.2015, ergodic wrote:
Wouldn't be better to use -j with no argument?
It's a matter of taste. I compile my kernels with a nice value of 19 (lowest
priority), because mostly I have to do other work while compiling a new
kernel.
I've never tried -j. How many processes does it open on you
On 09.03.2015, jd1008 wrote:
--- Package vlc-core.x86_64 0:2.2.0-1.fc21 will be an update
-- Processing Dependency: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit) for
package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64
yum update --exclude=vlc*
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 08.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote:
$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
18
FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and
administration packages:
[htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
13
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 08.03.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
You want to remove Gnome, and then what? Without Gnome, you do not have an X
desktop.
Using i3, he doesn't need one.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 08.03.2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
You want to remove Gnome, and then what? Without Gnome, you do not have an X
desktop.
Using i3, he doesn't need one.
s/one/a DE/;
X is always needed of course..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 05.03.2015, Tom Horsley wrote:
Is anyone else getting random USB failures at boot?
I'm using an APC UPS as well, and a USB mouse and keyboard.
Have not encountered a single problem yet. F21, fully updated.
[root@chiara ~]# lsusb
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 8087:8001 Intel Corp.
Bus 004 Device
On 26.02.2015, Jim Lewis wrote:
Well there is no way it was on CD, we didn't have those yet.
It was on floppy disks. I remember clearly, because I reformatted them
some time ago, in need for empty disks to check an external floppy disk drive.
--
users mailing list
On 26.02.2015, Dave Stevens wrote:
was it even on CD? My first slackware came from walnut creek on diskettes
(20 of 'em!)
I second that!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 25.02.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
One single button with 4000 lines of code behind it. You assume that
providing full control in a GUI just happens magically as if that work
is already done and the Anaconda folks are willfully disabling things.
Not at all.
An example could be something
On 24.02.2015, jd1008 wrote:
Myself, I always know how to tell anaconda I will manually partition
the drive, without resorting to external tools.
But I cannot assume that ALL other people have the know-how to
manually partition their drives.
A simple solution would be to do whatever is
On 23.02.2015, Pete Travis wrote:
Because that's that I want isn't a good way to ask for someone else's time.
I didn't ask for someone else's time, but for an explanation why there is a
custom mode which indeed isn't custom . I do not want somebody to implement
something
which fits my special
Hi,
booted from the F21 XFCE spin and tried to create four primary partitions:
/boot/efi
swap
/
/home
However, this seems to be impossible. When choosing the last of the four
partitions, the F21 installer automatically generates a /dev/sda5, within an
extended partition (sda4). No matter what I
On 22.02.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
There's no actual advantage of primary partitions on linux anyway.
Extlinux depends on primary partitions, but GRUB doesn't.
The thing is that I no longer have the freedom to do what I want when
installing (unless I've missed something crucial). If there is
On 22.02.2015, Matthew Miller wrote:
The installer UI is intended* to present meaningful decisions,
and make those choices easier and more straightforward..
When I chose custom partitioning, I actually chose to do things on my own,
which however won't be the case. That's weird. There's the
On 22.02.2015, Tom Horsley wrote:
Instead, I install in a virtual machine where anaconda is free
to trash the virtual disks in any way it sees fit, then I
copy the virtual images to partitions I create myself
adjust the grub.cfg and fstab files and boot using the
configfile option of a
On 22.02.2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
Windows, OS X installers have maybe 2-3 total layouts between them.
And their installers are completely, totally, bullet proof. They don't
ever crash, or ask the user to create required partitions, they always
succeed in their penultimate goal which is to
On 16.02.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
The problem I am having is that the stapler version at the URL is called
stapler-master..
In the .spec file, you have a line like this:
Source0:https://github.com/hellerbarde/stapler/archive/master.zip
I think this is a security hole, because
On 15.02.2015, Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
Still, I believe keepass is better. your opinion please?
KeePassX has strong encryption, is easy to handle and has user-configurable hash
iteration to delay brute force attacks. For me, it seems to be perfectly
suited.
--
users mailing list
On 15.02.2015, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
imagine if the word ISN'T a word that's found in the dictionary.ANY
dictionary.would that qualify it as being a bit more secure?
Here's the math behind it, so you can calculate for yourself:
The password strength (entropy) is calculated
Hi,
I've built countless computers in the last 20 years, but none with the nowadays
modern UEFI bioses. Unfortunately, my main machine seems to have gotten some
problems
after the last lightning storm, and it's time to renew the whole thing.
On the SSD, there's a fully updated F21, which I'd
On 15.02.2015, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
My brand new laptop allows you to switch to legacy mode. The only way
to find out is by accessing the settings which should be same as for
old BIOSes eg it's F2 on my laptop.
Thanks a lot for your answer! The new mainbord will be an Asus H97-Pro (or
On 15.02.2015, Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
1. Power on the system, press F2 as soon as the logo screen appears
Thanks a lot, will do!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 15.02.2015, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
..the simple trick is to push each letter over by one! That's it!
ROT1 (or ROTX, where X is any number) is a common part of most of the
dictionary attacks, very easy to implement and causes near zero CPU load.
So your ROT'ed password has not a single
On 15.02.2015, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I agree that a human might not be able to crack it but even a PC would have
a hard time if you use phrases, foreign words, and the like.
Please search the net on dictionary attack in combination with words like
feasibility, speed and the like. You
On 15.02.2015, g wrote:
granted, with w98se, such was not a great problem, except that he
had also encrypted a lot of files.
It totally depends on how much entropy a password has, assumed the crypto used
is strong and not flawed (e.g. proper implementation of AES, serpent, twofish
and the
On 15.02.2015, Stuart McGraw wrote:
When I tried to do a yum upgrade today (which includes a
new kernel) it failed with a message that my boot partition
space was short by 6MB.
What can I do to fix or mitigate this problem?
Remove all kernels except one which you have verified to be
On 15.02.2015, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I use Figaro's Password Manager. I don't know how good it is
(and would like to hear about that)
Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with it, so I can't answer here.
.. but it does give me a lot of options in creating the password.
This plays a minor role,
On 15.02.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Your only practical option is to remove the oldest kernel, which should
allow you to update, and change the installonly_limit setting in
/etc/yum.conf
Yep! And maybe he can live with two kernels installed. On my system, they take
less than 200 MB. Could
On 16.02.2015, Tim wrote:
Please search the net on dictionary attack in combination with words
like feasibility, speed and the like. You will be blown away by
reading what can be done.
Of course that kind of implies that you have something that will let you
continuously try different
On 13.02.2015, Neal Becker wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190715
It appears to be a problem with drm. All earlier kernels (for years and
years)
have worked.
Can you please boot with drm.debug=1 and post the output?
--
users mailing list
On 13.02.2015, Neal Becker wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190715
After reading your logs again, I have a feeling that your bug is a duplicate to
this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/982889
A workaround is in reply #5.
--
users mailing list
On 11.02.2015, Stephen Morris wrote:
I removed pluginreg.dat and restarted firefox but about:plugins said
I still had the 310 version installed. It wasn't until I rebooted
linux that firefox reflected the correct version, which is why I
thought it might be the ldconfig cache. I could have
On 03.02.2015, inode0 wrote:
I'd just take a few flash free days until adobe gets it fixed to be a
little safer.
Flash has been a security nightmare for ages, it will never get any safer..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 10.02.2015, Stephen Morris wrote:
I already have this repository configured and had installed the 440 version
quite some time ago (it seems we need to specify the exact version as this
repository seems to have the 64 bit and 32 bit versions), but firefox had
always said the installed
On 31.01.2015, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Note that if the home page is left blank via the preferences GUI
browser.startup.homepage gets set to about:home, and the same issue
happens but instead about:home is loaded instead of
start.fedoraproject.org , so it's probably an upstream issue, I am not
Hi,
Firefox has three different possibilities in Edit - Preferences - General
to chose from what should happen when Firefox starts:
1. Show my homepage
2. Show a blank page
3. Show my windows and tabs from last time
When using 3., for a short time the default home page
Hi,
tried to safely bring down a crashed Fedora 21 machine today, but M-sysrq
didn't do anything. After bringing the machine up again, the logs showed
that M-sysrq functionality was disabled. After investigating further, it seemed
that only Sysrq-S (emergency save) was actually working. In
On 30.01.2015, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I rebuilt the swap partition, did the swapon, and added
that UUID to /etc/fstab. Still errored out with same error. I removed
the 3.18.3-201 kernel headers module, reinstalled them, and now it
works. where is that old swap info kept, if not in
On 29.01.2015, Gary Stainburn wrote:
After running the tar zcvf ...
run the command tar ztvf .
to test it again.
And 1 day later you get a bad sector containing a part of your compressed
archive,
and your whole backup is gone (and according to Murphy's law, your harddisk
On 28.01.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
First, you should backup the whole drive, if it contains important data. Then,
you could do a smartctl -t long /dev/sdc and see if it completes without
error.
Most probably, you'll need a new
On 29.01.2015, Mickey wrote:
But what I'm concerned about is that Root will change the owner of the Tar
files. after i do the new install it will have the same user on the crashed
drive.
Never ever compress backup data which contains valuable data. One single bit
flip will
render your whole
On 25.01.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I've been using ssr-0.3.2-1.fc21.x86_64 screen recorder and it works very
well.
Strange. I have all the standard Fedora repositories configured, but there is no
ssr package available.
[root@keera ~]# yum search ssr-
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Warning: No matches
On 25.01.2015, Stephen Morris wrote:
Immediately after booting from the grub menu in F21 the first message I
get is 'Failure to start Load Kernel Modules'. Does anyone know what this
message means and how I rectify it?
Welcome to another systemd madness!
First, check if systemctl status
101 - 200 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
