On 05.07.2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It allows the various components to have specific dependencies so they
can start as soon as everything is in place. Older mechanisms such as
the traditional System V init scripts were much more limited and could
only do this with very ad hoc and
On 02.07.2014, George R Goffe wrote:
I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been
accessed for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to initial
requests.
Looks like there is some power management which puts the device to
sleep/spin down. Try disabling that. Also
On 02.07.2014, Rick Stevens wrote:
I don't know of a way to control either the size of the cache or its
retention period. It might be controllable via a sysctl, but I've never
tried to bugger things like that.
Look at parameters which can control the kernels virtual memory
management, e.g.:
On 27.06.2014, Mickey wrote:
Has anyone used the Ubuntu Boot-Repair-Disk on Fedora ?
No. But I've been using sysresccd all the time, and also for grub
repair. Has been working flawlessly.
http://www.sysresccd.org
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 27.06.2014, Roman Kravets wrote:
Jun 27 11:14:38 softded kernel: vmap allocation for size 1048576 failed: use
vmalloc=size to increase size.
What is it meen use vmalloc=size to increase size? When can I change it
parameter?
It is a kernel boot parameter, which you can add manually be
On 07.06.2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
What exactly is wrong with yum?
It has worked faultlessly and painlessly for me for years,
with addons to deal with every conceivable problem.
If there is some problem with it,
why not simply deal with that problem
instead of inventing a completely new
On 05.06.2014, Matthew Miller wrote:
Fedora has an update that should be rolling out soon.
And while we are waiting:
http://tinyurl.com/o3glbta
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 05.06.2014, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6881/gnutls-3.1.20-5.fc19
Is the patch backported to that version? The bug is fixed in 3.1.25,
but not in 3.1.20.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 01.06.2014, Mike Wright wrote:
Just bought the Samsung ML-2165W/XAC printer because it advertised Linux
support.
[]
Has anybody else had any success with this particular printer model?
Just return the crap to Samsung. Don't waste time.
--
users mailing list
On 28.05.2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm planning on moving the Fedora-20 system on my laptop
to a new hard disk (500GB instead of 80GB).
I've partitioned the new disk.
When I copy partitions from the old disk to the new one
with cp -a (running under a Fedora Live CD)
I get a lot of
On 28.05.2014, Tom Horsley wrote:
I've used rsync to do this (you have to go through the gazillion
options to get all the appropriate ones though).
rsync -avxHSAX will do it all.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 29.05.2014, Heinz Diehl wrote:
- mount /dev/sdaX /mnt
Where /dev/sdaX is your root partition. Forgot to mention that,
sorry!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora
On 29.05.2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Don't you have to correct UUIDs in /etc/fstab on the new disk?
Yes. Either that, or adjust the new UUIDs to the old ones.
It's done quickly, should have mentioned that.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 29.05.2014, Temlakos wrote:
All I want to do is move the contents of /home. What are the
best commands for doing this?
If you want to move the whole /home directory as is:
rsync -avxHSAX /home/ /new/home
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 21.05.2014, Mickey wrote:
Don't switch to Firefox, it is having problems of streaming video properly
with the flash-Plugin .
I have been using Firefox in many years, and didn't encounter
streaming problems with Flash videos. Do you have any evidence for your
statement?
--
users mailing
On 21.05.2014, Mickey wrote:
I have had problems of Firefox freezes while playing streaming video and
locking up computer.
Ok.
If this is not what you already did: uninstall the flash plugin,
download the .tar.gz archive of the appropriate plugin here:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
On 16.05.2014, Justin Brown wrote:
Has anyone else been able to enable SNA in Fedora 20 and were any
special steps needed?
Yes, has been working for me quite some time.
20-intel.conf:
Section Device
Identifier Card0
Driver intel
Option AccelMethod SNA
EndSection
Are you sure that
On 17.05.2014, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Section Device
Identifier Card0
Driver intel
Option AccelMethod SNA
EndSection
[htd@kiera ~]$ grep -ie uxa -ie sna /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 4.564] (**) intel(0): Option AccelMethod SNA
[ 4.565] (II) intel(0): SNA initialized with Ironlake
On 10.05.2014, Alan E. Davis wrote:
The biggest question for me is this: is it a kernel issue that I am only
seeing two governors, when other OSs see 4?
First: I do not run Fedora kernels, and therefore I don't know how
they are configured.
The problem you describe is most probably caused
On 28.04.2014, Javier Perez wrote:
My plan is to put the OS on a USB stick
In my experience, that's a bad idea. USB-sticks are not reliable over
a longer period, and you can expect data loss.
and use the whole 2TB for Data. I'd rather not have a
PATA SDD, and I do not want to lose one of
On 26.04.2014, Garry T. Williams wrote:
That's not true. Swap will come into play and unreferenced data in
the /tmp files will be paged out in favor of claiming that memory for
other uses.
Did you actually try?
[htd@kiera ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/bigfile bs=1M count=3000
dd: error
On 22.04.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Okular
lets you read, alter and add comments (I think, in the English version they
are called Reviews)
I receive quite often .pdf files containing comments. Evince reads
them properly. Okular can be very slow sometimes, even stuck in the
middle of a
On 17.04.2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Received: from localhost (alfred.gayleard.eu [127.0.0.1]) by
alfred.gayleard.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4C622D57 for
t...@localhost.gayleard.eu; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:15:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from alfred.gayleard.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
On 16.04.2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The two config files (master.cf and main.cf) are difficult to follow,
and the documentation is poor.
For a homeserver or single use MTA:
1. leave master.cf alone
2. Define these in main.cf
- myhostname
- mydomain
- myorigin
- mydestination
On 15.04.2014, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
Finally, I got msmtp working but I'm still not really happy
(it doesn't rewrite destination addresses for aliased forwards,
and that's a big problem with today's spam filters), so I will
revert to sendmail in F21.
yum install postfix
It's easy to
On 18.03.2014, CS_DBA wrote:
In the meantime, does Fedora play well with USB wireless
cards/devices?
It does. I have similar problems as you describe in this thread (F19),
and using an external USB network adapter solved it. I don't have the
time to debug the problem.
--
users mailing
On 18.03.2014, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 18.03.2014, CS_DBA wrote:
In the meantime, does Fedora play well with USB wireless
cards/devices?
It does. I have similar problems as you describe in this thread (F19),
and using an external USB network adapter solved it. I don't have the
time
On 18.03.2014, Ed Greshko wrote:
I hope someone would have bugzilla'd the issue :-)
I know, you're absolutely right. But the problem seems to be quite
complex, and in my case, F20 is already out, so nobody will listen to
me anyway without having updated to F20 first :-)
--
users
On 16.03.2014, CS DBA wrote:
Here's my question: If I simply backup all directories (including ones like
/proc /media, etc) will the following work, or do I need to care about
specifically excluding the virtual directories?
I would run any backup/restore of the root filesystem only when
On 05.03.2014, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well The article pointed to by poc states
Yes, you're right. Sorry for the noise!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of
On 05.03.2014, Matthew Miller wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3413/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19
Do they fix the bug?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 10.02.2014, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
uh, no. if that's all you specify, you get *way* more packages than
just kernel and kernel-devel -- when my build worked earlier today, i
think i counted 11. so that claim is a massive underestimate, but i'll
You can do it another way:
1. Take the
On 12.02.2014, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
well, sure, but that's definitely not equivalent to building from
the official fedora source rpm, which comes with red hat-supplied
patches.
Unless you're using something very special which depends on those
patches, you'll be fine with a vanilla
On 09.02.2014, Chris Murphy wrote:
- reduce swappiness: /etc/sysctl.conf
vm.swappiness=1
vm.vfs_cache_pressure=50
I wouldn't do this. If swap is needed, then swap is needed.
While vfs_cache_pressure = 50 is the standard, swappiness set to 1
does not mean that the kernel
On 21.01.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
cat d1.letter |procmail
You can also re-run existing mails through the whole system, e.g. by
piping the mail into formail -ds | procmail. You can do that in mutt
by pressing the | and writing the command in the field which opened
up.
So what is
On 02.01.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Hibernate takes all the current state and copies it to swap. Thus you need
a large swap to handle this. I always create my swap twice my memory size.
This is not neccessary. A swapspace equal the amount of RAM is enough
to hibernate.
--
users mailing
On 02.01.2014, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
[Hibernation]
Note however that Linux support for this is pretty limited/ buggy and I
would recommend you don't do it.
My whole family uses Linux and has used hibernation regularly. None of
us has encountered problems so far...
--
users mailing list
On 01.01.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am looking at going with the flow that a notebook should not need
an MTA
Any MTA for just one user will do. You won't even notice that it's
there. System load and the ability to handle a lot of connections is
not relevant in this case.
I will
On 30.12.2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But which is the kindest to the system resources, sendmail or postfix?
Postfix, definitely.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora
On 31.12.2013, Suvayu Ali wrote:
[Journal]
#SystemMaxUse=1.0G
SystemMaxFileSize=1.0G
I guess you'll have to activate SystemMaxUse=1.0G to see the effect you're
expecting..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
average. A quick look into my spam-folder is enough to check if any
serious email
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
[CRM-114..]
But you don't trust it enough, not to check...
No. Because email loss is strictly not acceptable. I always check back
manually. CRM-114, once trained, is pretty good, and it takes no more
than 10-15 secs to see if there's real email amongst all the spam.
On 24.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
Right now I am FINALLY going to remember to reboot into the offending
kernel and see if this happens again.
This one came up on LKML today, maybe it's related:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/27/255
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 25.12.2013, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I run fetchmail with option mda /usr/bin/procmail -t -f -
to deliver (and filter) via procmail.
hmmm ... i may try that. i assume that, with this approach, i
won't need to install sendmail, correct?
Correct.
Using MUAs like Alpine,
On 24.12.2013, Rolf Turner wrote:
WTF do I have to do?
1. Download the latest Flash plugin
2. Copy libflashplayer.so to ~/.mozilla/plugins
3. Restart Firefox
You're done.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 25.12.2013, Heinz Diehl wrote:
1. Download the latest Flash plugin
http://get.adobe.com/de/flashplayer/
You choose the .tar.gz archive.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 26.12.2013, Rolf Turner wrote:
Yes It worked. Thank you hugely.
You're welcome!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3
stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
Dec 22 20:11:50 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4154.123765] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1
stuck for 22s! [httpd:1793]
It's the kernel watchdog bailing out. Do you run
On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
No. All non-virtual on this issue...
Ok. How high is the load when this happens?
Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 24.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups?
Yes:
kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
Right now I am FINALLY going to remember to reboot into the offending
kernel and see if this happens again.
If you can reproduce this with a vanilla
On 22.12.2013, Tom Horsley wrote:
Is there no loop device in the new 3.12.5 kernel by
default?
In 3.12.6 vanilla, it definitely is.
[htd@kiera ~]$ uname -a
Linux kiera.fritha.org 3.12.6-rc1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 19 16:55:38 CET 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
users mailing list
On 20.12.2013, Tom Horsley wrote:
I see the partitioning interface still hasn't improved in f20.
You still simply must go on faith that you might be allowed
to make the changes you want sometime after you press a
button labeled Done.
Yes, that's f*cking annoying...
--
users mailing list
On 08.12.2013, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just from the above, what is the purpose of running isohybrid
in step 1 when you just do a raw copy of the ISO image to the
USB drive in step 2?
Isohybrid makes the image a hybrid, being bootable from both CD and
a USB-drive.
--
users mailing list
On 08.12.2013, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
ah, so it modifies the ISO image in place, does it?
Yes, it does.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 08.12.2013, Greg Woods wrote:
I am trying to find a way to get a service to restart when the system is
resumed from suspend or hibernation.
You can place a script in /usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep like
this. Replace placeholder with your own script you want to have
executed when the system
On 07.12.2013, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I've installed another hard drive in this computer and would like to be able
to install Fedora-20 on it from an exiting F-20-beta iso file already on
this same computer. I can't seem to find any instructions for doing
this.
You could
On 27.11.2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
is \Phi.
The document shows up correctly for me, in both evince and okular.
--
users mailing
On 21.11.2013, AP wrote:
Well I just heard a couple of guys saying rpm hell.
Now a days, when rpm works very well, still does it lag behind apt in
some ways...?
What precisely are you asking for?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 21.11.2013, AP wrote:
Just wanted to know if rpm is better than apt or vice-versa or both
are equal
Better/equal in precisely what?
...or why did this bifurcation took place if the Linux is only the kernel...?
Because there are different distributions which all think that their
own
On 08.11.2013, EGO.II-1 wrote:
Hello, I'm backI've been through the wasteland of distros...but I
couldn't find anything that aided my workflow as well as Fedora. But I have
a problem, I have just gone ahead and done a fedup upgrade to Fedora
20..
F20 is currently in alpha-state, as far
On 06.11.2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
People I find offensive I simply filter out and never
see them. It would seem others would do the same
I have never understood this problem here on the list. You don't
like to read somebodies email? Write a killfile, put
him/her in it,
On 31.10.2013, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Failed to load module nv (module does not exist, 0)
Take a look into /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, most probably the uninstaller
didn't restore the kernel boot parameters which has been placed in
order to get the nv driver to work. Looks like you'll have to
On 25.10.2013, Andre Robatino wrote:
I have an old i686 machine with a Cyrix M II CPU which is (barely) capable
of running Fedora. The latest version of openssl
(openssl-1.0.1e-28.fc19.i686) breaks incoming and outgoing ssh.
There's an update to openssl-1.0.1e-29.fc19, maybe it fixes your
On 14.10.2013, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I wonder what is the current status with regards to Samsung F2FS boot
support. When I first heard about F2FS I thought it'd be a nice solution to
finally be able to get a full R/W Linux installed on a pen drive, without
tricks like ram drives...
To
On 30.09.2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I did close (after umount and using root)
/dev/mapper/luks-61967fe7-9143-45ea-aaf5-2e2697dbfeed
but again, when I plug the key back, it mounts the vol without
askig the passphrase.
So something is caching your passphrase. Now you have to find out what
On 28.09.2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I would like that it ask me the paraphrase every time that the key
in replugged. How can I get this behavior?
You have to check if there's something which caches your passphrase,
and in this case you should prevent your passphrase from being
cached. If this
On 20.09.2013, ppq wrote:
Everything works fine on my ThinkPad Edge E135 with F19, so this is how it
should look like: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/40764/
Using a live system (F19, too) on my PC, the HDD works a little (i.e. very
slow), while dmesg looks like this:
On 20.09.2013, ppq wrote:
I also don't think it is a hardware problem because the hard drive works on
USB2.0 ports, just not on USB3.0.
I think the problem lies somewhere in the kernel xhci-driver. I'm
actually compiling the latest git after the merge window closed, and
if my problem persist,
On 18.09.2013, poma wrote:
[1] https://patrick-nagel.net/blog/archives/337
Discard takes time, of course. I run two OCZ Vertex 4 drives, and
deleting a complete kernel sourcetree doesn't take 40s with blocked
I/O on my systems (XFS filesystem, mounted with discard). I guess
this is mainly
On 17.09.2013, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Is that the stock 3.10.11?
It's 3.11.1 vanilla (from kernel.org), with some minor modifications
(which are all not relevant to mdraid).
A search via git reveals that discard has been introduced to raid1 by
commit 2ff8cc2c6d4e323de71a42affeb3041fa17d5b10 in
On 16.09.2013, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Does the mdraid subsystem relays this command to the actual SSD?
What I've found so far is that some patches were submitted upstream
(mdraid) for this but don't know if it made to Fedora 19.
I don't run a Fedora kernel, but took a short look into
On 16.09.2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
Does fstrim work with md-raid devices these days with Fedora 19 out of
the box? I would like to use 2 SSDs (in RAID-1) wondered about trim
support.
Do you have any objections against the use of discard?
Just asking..
which *is* trim
Yes.
On 15.09.2013, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Does fstrim work with md-raid devices these days with Fedora 19 out of
the box? I would like to use 2 SSDs (in RAID-1) wondered about trim
support.
Do you have any objections against the use of discard?
Just asking..
--
users mailing list
On 09.09.2013, Powell, Michael wrote:
If you're one of the lucky few that bought an Optimus laptop after they
started adding a BIOS option to select the nVidia hardware, you're quite
fortunate, but I wasn't so lucky. I will try native nVidia support in the
future, but most likely not
On 09.09.2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
[bcache]
how could this feature turned on at default?
if you think about it you know it's impossible
why? because that would mean using a *random??* SSD as cache for *what*
devices?
Compiling in bcache support *doesn't do anything*. You have to set up
On 07.09.2013, Fernando Cassia wrote:
1. Is there a kernel spec file for Fedora 19 that could be used to compile
a 3.11 kernel with the same build parameters as the F19 one?
I don't know. You could use the Fedora .config which usually resides
in /boot after installing a Fedora kernel.
2.
On 07.09.2013, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Im specially interested in that feature of 3.11 I read about last week
-whose name I now forget, it wasnt 'lazy writes'' but close to it-
that would minimize writes to SSDs and extend their life.
I'm not aware of such a feature added to 3.11. In case you
On 07.09.2013, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Btw, what is the default for this option in Fedora, on or off? If the
default is on, how to turn it off in the cleanest possible way?
Enabling CONFIG_BCACHE alone doesn't do anything to your SSD. You have
to set up and register the devices you want to use
On 06.09.2013, Javier Perez wrote:
My beef is given the NSA origin of this software, It could very well have a
backdoor to turn itself off under the appropriate circumstances like an
NSA-sponsored breach an allow unrestricted access to my system..
Every person contributing to free open
On 06.09.2013, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
It used to be that LibreOffice was acceptable, although way from perfect.
But recently, it is causing severe headaches. I'm importing and exporting
as DOCX in Writer, and I get cases where it crashes persistently when I
want to open a document, or in
On 31.08.2013, agraham wrote:
Right now I'm looking for answers and a forum in which to discuss this.
If you have *proof* for your statements, go to the Linux Kernel
Mailinglist and let them show what you have. You could even send a
mail to Linus directly.
Here's what I consider to be proof
On 26.08.2013, Alchemist wrote:
Very good discussion. This is an important issue. OpenSSL with Elliptic
Curve was added to the http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist, but the question
remains open
Is the crypto the real problem (=weakest link), or is it something else? I
guess that would be the
On 21.08.2013, ergodic wrote:
The UUIDs of the newly partitioned drive will most probably
be different from those of the original drive
They *are* different, with 100% certainty. Great you mentioned it,
this will help to avoid mount problems (and save some time using a
rescue disk to fix that
Hi Mihai,
On 20.08.2013, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. I add to the mix my test results for
F19 with kernel 3.10.7 on an ASUS UX31E with its factory 256GB
SSD-only mass storage.
CFQ scheduler run1:
[]
All these numbers are pointless, because when I see your
On 20.08.2013, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Then, open another one and run fsync-tester. The numbers that count to
compare different elevators on your system is the output fsync-tester
generates while your machine is generating the bigfile.
And while your're at it, you could also consider doing some
On 20.08.2013, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
Here are the program numbers while running the script:
CFQ:
[]
Seems that cfq performs better on your machine, under this workload.
Gave it a quick test (using the original fsync-tester from Ted Tso):
cfq:
htd@kiera test]$ ./fst1
fsync time:
On 20.08.2013, Heinz Diehl wrote:
[]
And the kernel is vanilla from kernel.org:
[htd@kiera ~]$ uname -a
Linux kiera.fritha.org 3.10.8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Aug 20 19:53:31 CEST 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 19.08.2013, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
I plan to swap the HD on my laptop with an SSD of same size. Will it work OK
if I dd the HD to an external HD, swap the HD with the SSD and dd the
contents back to the SSD?
Technically it would work, but you'll most probably encounter a huge
performance
On 19.08.2013, Richard Vickery wrote:
In considering a new computer, one of those under consideration is an
AMD chip with Windoze; the salesman suggested that other customers
have said that Linux has issues with AMD. Do we have issues with this
chip?
There are some issues with all chips,
On 19.08.2013, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
It appears that CFQ can sense and adapt to SSD and has little
if any loss to other I/O schedulers:
http://www.velobit.com/storage-performance-blog/bid/126135/Effects-Of-Linux-IO-Scheduler-On-SSD-Performance
They only tested bandwidth, not latency. On
On 18.08.2013, Peter Gueckel wrote:
In KDE settings, you can set the spellcheck language to Canadian and
the keyboard to English(US). Libreoffice and Firefox have a Canadian
English option. I don't think these are dedicated dictionaries for
Canadian spelling
As far as I know, Libreoffice
On 12.08.2013, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
I upgraded to a new kernel yesterday and today had another hard freeze.
Aren't there any tools to investigate what happened?
If you are shure that your problem isn't related to a hardware
failure, you should first compile a vanilla 3.10.6 kernel
On 12.08.2013, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Skimming through /var/log/messages, it seems to me that my freezes
coincide with the following messages repeated many (hundreds?
thousands?) times:
Aug 12 11:25:59 localhost kernel: [13380.541175] mei_me :00:16.0:
reset: unexpected enumeration
On 12.08.2013, Heinz Diehl wrote:
You should report this via the Fedora/Redhat bugzilla, it's a kernel
driver bug. In the meantime, you can fix it by recompiling
your kernel with these two deactivated (set to no):
CONFIG_INTEL_MEI
CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_ME
You can, of course, simply blacklist
On 10.08.2013, Ahmad Samir wrote:
Personally, I am not with or against this change, but here's their
rationale http://limi.net/checkboxes-that-kill
To me, the argumentation presented on this site seems somehow grounded,
but is *not* relevant. Javascript and showing pictures could simply be
On 09.08.2013, David wrote:
Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular
Fedora Community users', sucjh as you, and not for myself? And that I
was asking because so many other Linux distributions already have them.
I already have the latest releases.
Updates usually
On 07.08.2013, Richard Shaw wrote:
$ rpm -qa kernel
kernel-3.9.9-201.fc18.x86_64
kernel-3.9.11-200.fc18.x86_64
kernel-3.9.10-200.fc18.x86_64
Try with 3.10.5 vanilla.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 07.08.2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
why should someone compile his own kernel?
Because the problem(s) could be related to one of the Fedora patches.
It's quite common for me that different people report kernel related
problems here on the list which doesn't occur on my systems. I rarely
use a
On 08.08.2013, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
I have already appended 'blacklist i915' to
/lib/modprobe.d/dist-blacklist.conf but it is still being loaded. What else
can I do?
On the long run, you could disable all CONFIG_DRM_i915 options in your
kernel .config and
Replying to myself, just to drop a note about an old and long time
ongoing problem which maybe affects some others here on the list:
On 28.07.2013, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Yes, I am. Because I own 2 totally different machines and are
occasionally using another one at work with integrated Intel
301 - 400 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
