On 12/17/2011 8:42 PM, g wrote:
ok, to deal with bios upgrade.
does you bios boot show screens or a graphic banner?
does bios have ability to show 'detail' screens during boot?
if so, boot in that mode to see what is there. some will give an option
of 'other' or something to that effect.
inline
On 12/17/2011 10:02 PM, g wrote:
-=-
it is a sham/shame that stores do not have techs with more knowledge
than what they do. even tho most all systems are sold with oos, there
are still some that sell with linux.
therefore, give thought to set up a user home for tech to use and remove
On 12/17/2011 10:41 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
A couple of notes for this thread.
Some BIOS's will not show the option for booting from a USB
device if the device isn't plugged in when first booted. I have 2005
ASUS motherboards in my classroom that do this.
I've also seen some newer
On 12/17/2011 11:10 PM, g wrote:
On 12/18/2011 06:31 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
They'll get thunderbird, but no email (if they want it, I'll have to
have a reason).
-=-
thunderbird is email. firefox is web browser. tho, if they are savvy,
linux file browsers can be used for web browser
On 12/14/2011 6:31 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
Mail clients differ. It's quite possible that yours would filter out
duplicate addresses and somebody else's would not. (It's also possible
that the list server would filter duplicates.)
As another test, I'm also putting the Fedora list into both the
On 12/14/2011 9:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/15/2011 12:58 PM, Linux Guy wrote:
Long story short.
I have several thousand maildir emails in about 10 directories in
Evolution. I need to get them into existing directories in
Thunderbird which uses mbox format.
How ?
I thankfully haven't
On 12/14/2011 9:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/15/2011 01:16 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I use mb2md in conjunction with clamav, so I am presuming there is a
reverse?
It there is, it goes by a more obscure name
[egreshko@meimei Processed]$ yum whatprovides *bin/mb2md
Loaded plugins
On 12/12/2011 11:13 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Perhaps the best option to look at it.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/#screenshots
Michael:
Much better, thanks for the additional info
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 12/13/2011 5:22 AM, John Aldrich wrote:
Quoting Michael D. Setzer II mi...@kuentos.guam.net:
Perhaps the best option to look at it.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/#screenshots
Let me say I have used G4L at a previous employer to do backups of
On 12/13/2011 5:42 AM, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
Paul,
My advice is to keep it simple. Burn the Clonezilla Live¹ ISO to a
CD/DVD and use it to save an image of the current hard drive to the
USB drive. Step-by-step directions for saving and restoring the
image² are provided.
I've been following
On 12/13/2011 9:27 AM, g wrote:
back to the begining. thread has gotten so long, this is easier than
finding my post that i know caused you more confusion.
in that post, i stated to install 'partedmagic' on a usb stick;
http://partedmagic.com/doku.php?id=creating_the_liveusb
and add
[NOTE: there is a question at the end if you want to skip my reply to
all the emails posted]
To all who have responded, many thanks. There were alot of queries to go
through and I am only now at a point that I can take first look at them
as a collective suggestion.
I wanted to clarify a
On 12/12/2011 9:11 AM, g wrote:
On 12/12/2011 02:27 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
hello michael,
i am glad you follow this list.
As the current maintainer of G4L since about 2004, I'm not sure
which version is included with partedmagic, but the latest release
version on sourceforge has
On 12/12/2011 8:13 PM, g wrote:
On 12/13/2011 03:37 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
My two questions are ... am I correct in assuming that after I create
the stick that I can boot off it to test that it is a working copy?
-=-
correct.
if you use a 32 gb memory stick, you can put 'partedmagic
On 12/12/2011 9:15 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 12 Dec 2011 at 19:41, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:41:21 -0800
From: Paul Allen Newellpnew...@cs.cmu.edu
To: Community support for Fedora users
users
On 12/12/2011 9:40 PM, g wrote:
[...]
-=-
apoligies for confusing you.
if michael advises against pulling g4l files out of iso image, partition
usb stick. 1 for partedmagic, 1 for g4l, 1 for clone backup.
G:
Let me reply tomorrow, thanks in advance
Paul
--
users mailing list
I have been following the fedora causes laptop to overheat as my HP
dv6500 is showing signs of malfunctioning, potentially an overheating
issue. Display flickers, part of it get dim, and then it goes black.
Computer is still up and running as I can ssh into it.
I've looked into the BIOS
On 12/11/2011 10:18 PM, g wrote:
On 12/12/2011 05:54 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Before I consider actually doing it, I wanted to ask if there is the
equivalent of a recovery disk that I can create with k3b so,
-=-
not a 'recovery disk', but i will suggest getting 'parted magic
On 12/11/2011 10:24 PM, g wrote:
*oops*
Appreciate the catch on the typo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On 12/11/2011 10:25 PM, jarmo wrote:
sunnuntai, 11. joulukuuta 2011 21:54:28 Paul Allen Newell kirjoitti:
I have been following the fedora causes laptop to overheat as my HP
dv6500 is showing signs of malfunctioning, potentially an overheating
I think, this is not Fedora issue. It is computer
On 12/11/2011 10:29 PM, g wrote:
On 12/12/2011 06:27 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 12/11/2011 10:24 PM, g wrote:
*oops*
Appreciate the catch on the typo
lol.
welcome.
G:
I went through the clonezilla page and liked what I saw until I hit:
+++
Recovery Clonezilla live with multiple
On 12/02/2011 03:29 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
I have a test machine with Fedora 15 x86_64 and ran preupgrade
and all seemed to go fine. But after reboot, it comes up with the
grub menu and option to upgrade to 16, but then selecting it just
results in a blinking cursor in the upper left.
On 12/03/2011 10:38 PM, david walcroft wrote:
On 12/04/2011 02:33 PM, Craig White wrote:
Places to check for errors...
[...]
Craig
I have looked in 'dmesg' and '/var/log/messages',there are no error
messages.
I tried the remove and reinstall trick but nothing changed.
Thanks
On 12/03/2011 11:17 PM, david walcroft wrote:
I have just upgraded from FC12 where it worked reasonably.
david
David:
Thanks for the info. Through this list, I learned about k3b and
installed it on F14. I haven't had any problems. I am offering this info
if there does prove to be a problem
On 12/1/2011 12:44 PM, g wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
Also, I'm a tad curious if anybody else
had the same reaction before reading it.
---
no. including fact that he posted html.
linuxisone aka linux tyro.
I've been on other lists where it is courtesy to say hello
Community:
I am trying to run gdb on a program that is crashing and I am getting
messages of:
+++
Missing separate debuginfos, use debug-install glibc-2.13.2.x86_64
libgcc-4.5.1.fc14.x86_64 libg++-4.5.1.fc14.x86_64
libstdc++-4.5.1.fc14.x86_64
---
Googling is not giving me anything that I
On 11/28/2011 12:46 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
It's telling you to install the debug pkgs,
which are not already installed.
as the line says use debug-install glibc-2.13.2.x86_64 etc..
Frank:
Thanks for the reply. That is what I thought as well, but I couldn't see
anything with yum -list. I am
On 11/28/2011 1:09 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
at the prompt
~$ debuginfo-install pkgname
Aside: With F14 eol in 2 weeks is it worth it?
Maybe see if F15 has the same crash?
Frank:
Well, since I was looking for debuginfo-install as something yum would
list, I would have never gotten close to
Fedora-list:
Since fc5, I have always downloaded an iso of the full image of Fedora
w/ Gnome. Given the emails on f15 and now f16, I am interested in
looking at alternatives to Gnome. After much clicking through the Fedora
site, it appears to me that only f16 w/ Gnome has a direct download
On 11/26/2011 11:14 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Paul Allen Newellpnew...@cs.cmu.edu
wrote:
Fedora-list:
Since fc5, I have always downloaded an iso of the full image of Fedora
w/ Gnome. Given the emails on f15 and now f16, I am interested in
looking at
On 11/26/2011 11:27 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Paul Allen Newellpnew...@cs.cmu.edu
wrote:
If the one install DVD has all of the DEs (gnome, kde, xfce, and
lxde), how does one tell the installation process which one to use? This
may be pure newbie on my
I have submitted a bug on k3b regarding crashing on simulate write
when an actual burn works. Aside from that, it works great (in my
opinion, better than brasero and/or gnomebaker). I'm still playing to
make sure I am 100% certain, but I think I've got another item checked
off on the list of
, Paul Allen Newellpnew...@cs.cmu.edu wrote:
On 11/4/2011 8:26 PM, fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:24:39PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote:
You CAN do yum install k3b and it'll install the necessary KDE
bits along with k3b. that's the way I
On 11/5/2011 5:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
No problem. yum will take care of dependencies when you install it, and
it should run fine. For example, I'm writing this in Evolution, even
though I run KDE as my desktop (i.e. the other way round).
poc
Poc:
I would agree but as I've got a
On 11/5/2011 4:19 AM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
The find command will easily determine the longest path in your directory
tree.
If ~/foo is the root of the tree that you want to burn, try:
$ cd ~/foo
$ find . -print ../paths.txt
Awhile back I'd written a python script to
On 11/4/2011 4:53 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I normally use GnomeBreaker to burn CD/DVDs. The windows
compatibility mode (Juliet file system) is enabled by default. So is
the Rockridge file system for Linux name support. You can still read
CD/DVDs without the Rockridge file system. Linux
On 11/4/2011 3:18 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 11/4/2011 4:53 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I normally use GnomeBreaker to burn CD/DVDs.
[...]
Mikkel
- --
Mikkel:
Thanks for advice. I am presuming you meant Gnomebaker, not Gnomebreaker?
[...]
Paul
Gnomebaker is not going
On 11/4/2011 6:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I've not been following this thread, but is try k3b too obvious?
(apart from pointing out that it's Brasero, not Brassero).
poc
Poc:
My bad on spelling of Brasero ... thank you for correction.
As for k3b, its for KDE if I am correct? I'm on
On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote:
You CAN do yum install k3b and it'll install the necessary KDE
bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it.
Fred:
I was unaware that kde packages could operate under gnome and vice
versa? No conflicts in doing such?
Thanks,
Paul
--
users
On 11/4/2011 8:26 PM, fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:24:39PM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 11/4/2011 8:22 PM, fred smith wrote:
You CAN do yum install k3b and it'll install the necessary KDE
bits along with k3b. that's the way I always do it.
Fred:
I was unaware that kde
I am trying out burning DVDs on F14 and I am seeing some weirdness that
I would like to understand before I call it a bug.
I burn a directory on F14. The directory structure is deep (as in
greater than the pop-up notice of 7) and the names should be within 60
characters. Brassero asks me about
On 11/1/2011 3:59 PM, Alex wrote:
Yes, I've implemented iptables to drop the attempts. I was really just
curious if it was a specific attack with a known pattern so I could
investigate further. fail2ban is great for things like this.
Thanks,
Alex
Alex:
Do you have an example of the
On 11/1/2011 5:07 PM, Alex wrote:
Yes, quite easy. Just doing it manually for now:
# Create the LOGDROP chain
iptables -N LOGDROP
iptables -F LOGDROP
iptables -A LOGDROP -j LOG --log-prefix LOGDROP
iptables -A LOGDROP -j DROP
iptables -j LOGDROP -I INPUT -soffending_ip -dmy_ip -p tcp
On 11/1/2011 5:42 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. If you bear with a couple hopefully-not-too-naive questions ...
I seems to me that you are saying the actions you wish to stop are from
soffending_ip using -p tcp ... why the need to specify the
destination of -dmy_ip (since if this iptables
On 11/1/2011 6:23 PM, Alex wrote:
[...]
Best,
Alex
Alex:
Many thanks for the help as it does make all this iptable stuff clearer
... I never would have known to search for CIDR notation and it sures
makes alot more sense when I read those sites
Paul
--
users mailing list
Dave:
inline comments
On 10/14/2011 06:29 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
The important thing to me is that they are on WPA2 and have both a rich
key and admin password.
Now that's a totally different can'o'worms--you're talking wireless
requirements, which is layered on top of the network
On 10/15/2011 04:11 AM, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 18:06 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
All I have to do is convince them to do MAC access filter list and
I'll be happy.
MAC filtering is utterly pointless. [...]
Tim:
Thanks for the comments. I have let my niece and roommates know
On 10/15/2011 08:14 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 21:41 +1030, Tim wrote:
MAC filtering is utterly pointless.
We use it on *wired* networks, primarily to prevent visitors whose
laptops have not been properly vetted (and may be crawling with malware)
from connecting to our
On 10/15/2011 12:48 PM, Craig White wrote:
sure - buy a layer 3 managed switch (an unlikely candidate for home
implementations)
Craig:
Thanks, I was just curious why it was only wireless and not both
wireless and wired. Understand the limitations of MAC addresses ... as
I mentioned earlier
Hello to all:
A long time ago when I first struggled and figured out how to set up a
LAN network, I got some advice about how I should alloc the numbers. 1)
start static address at *.*.*.10, 2) put WAPs at *.*.*.245, and 3) for a
gateway of 192.168.1.1, assign your router that connects to the
Tim, Joe, and Dave:
Thanks for the email replies. The take I come away with from your three
emails is 1) assume *.0 and *.255 are reserved, 2) there is no standard,
just personal conventions -- and that a group using a router should have
a convention, and 3) let DHCP handle it if possible. If
On 10/11/2011 12:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Other than a legal check for conflicts with trademarks etc, that is
correct. Any name can get through if someone proposes and enough people
vote for it. Anyone with a Fedora account can vote and getting a
account takes only a few minutes. You
On 10/10/2011 06:58 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I agree
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:40:01 -0500 Chris Kloiber
ckloi...@ckloiber.com wrote:
Wow...
That just sounds wrong on *SO* many levels.
Beefy Miracle
Actually, I have to believe this is a joke email if it is true,
then all I can
On 10/10/2011 09:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 13:44:53 +1000,
Rohan Ferrisro...@rferris.org wrote:
I gave 0 for Beefy Miracle also. Is this a joke?
Sort of. Beefy Miracle has been an inside joke going back at least
several releases now. A number of people who like
[cut-and-paste from archives]
gary artim wrote:
+++
have a clickpad I can play with at work and tried out the beta of SuSe
and FC16. both have better support but the right click and center
click for does not work -- tools i need. you can set tapping to 2 or 3
fingers to get the right and center
On 10/7/2011 11:25 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/07/2011 02:17 AM, JD wrote:
Thanx.
A good point.
I wish the upgrade process would
actually prompt the user for performing
such steps.
Even better would be for the upgrade process to offer to do this for the
user so that people wouldn't have to
Hello to all:
I have a HP Pavilion dv6-3225dx that was installed with Win7 and I am
trying to dual-boot with F14. I've managed to do that, but I am seeing
totally wacko action out of the mouse (which is a touchpad with a
movement area and two buttons below). The long and short of it is
On 9/19/2011 6:32 AM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
See my other posts about DHCP and address assignments.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih...@dminet.com
Dave:
Given that I got four emails from you which all distill down to try it,
it is easy and you already provided a piece of cake for my
On 9/18/2011 7:20 AM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:53:34AM -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
How can one ssh from a cygwin shell to a Fedora box?
It's a piece of cake--I do it all the time.
Dave:
Incredible ... it was totally a piece of cake. Once you told me where
[inline]
On 9/18/2011 12:04 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
I hope your question has been answered.
Very much so per prior email
A couple of tricks and traps:
3. I use sftp to copy both ways, if all I need to do is to copy.
Looking into this, though it seems like it may be overkill for my needs
On 9/18/2011 4:33 PM, jdow wrote:
Why not just use samba? Works like a champ here for a mixed bag of
about a dozen computers, occasional Macs, several 'ix, and several
MS boxes XP through 7. Why make it harder on yourself than necessary?
{^_^}
Given that all I want to do is scp with the
On 9/18/2011 8:52 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
You can run an sshd daemon under Cygwin so that a windows box can be
ssh'd into just as if it were a linux box. It was enough of a pain to
set up, though, that since I don't really need it, I don't routinely
even set it up.
Robert.
Robert:
The
On 9/1/2011 11:18 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
On 09/02/2011 04:25 AM, Peter G. wrote:
Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I run Fedora in school computer lab. I cannot upgrade to F15 because
of gnome3.
Boo hoo.
He is not alone
+1
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 9/1/2011 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/02/2011 06:44 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I run Fedora in school computer lab. I cannot upgrade to F15 because
of gnome3. In order to help the community stay with Fedora, could
security updates for F14 be provided until F17 is released?
On 9/2/2011 6:06 AM, Mike Wohlgemuth wrote:
On 09/02/2011 02:51 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hum ... I find it a difficult proposition to ask users to step up and
do it when the march of progress indicates that it wasn't the users
that asked for this change. Change may be good, but I think
On 9/2/2011 6:29 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/02/2011 12:21 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Hum ... I find it a difficult proposition to ask users to step up and
do it when the march of progress indicates that it wasn't the users
that asked for this change.
That may well be the case
On 9/2/2011 2:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Robert Arkiletian wrote:
In order to help the community stay with Fedora, could
security updates for F14 be provided until F17 is released?
Fedora is not a democracy. It is a meritocracy.
The only changes that get made to Fedora are by people
On 8/29/2011 11:03 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Aug 29, 2011 3:49 PM, g gel...@bellsouth.net
mailto:gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
SNIP
whats more, because it is graphical, there are ways of removing what is
there. gimp is only one of the great linux graphics programs that can be
used to
On 8/22/2011 9:51 PM, Tim wrote:
Have a look at a virgin hosts file, and it'll be like this:
cat /etc/hosts
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
::1
On 8/24/2011 7:26 PM, Craig White wrote:
Craig:
Thanks for the two emails (one in response to Tim). I am trying to do my
homework but more importantly trying to understand just what I need so I
don't solve a problem that doesn't need to be solved.
Paul
--
users mailing list
On 8/22/2011 9:51 PM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
Thanks for your two emails. I am stepping back, going through all the
email again, and rethinking what I am trying to do and the best way to
do it. This little exercise was much bigger than I thought and I need
to do alot of learning before I come up with
On 8/20/2011 5:52 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
You do have the sendmail-cf package installed and are running
/etc/mail/make when you're done editing your configuration, as explained
at the top of sendmail.mc, correct?
Yup, learned about that one on my first round of dealing with mail
Thanks,
On 8/20/2011 9:17 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I thought the command was 'make /etc/mail' and that it hasn't been
necessary for about the last 10 years when restarting sendmail
via /etc/init.d/sendmail restart (or service sendmail restart) would
automatically
[inline]
On 8/20/2011 3:42 AM, Craig White wrote:
If it looks something like this on your SMTP server
# netstat -an
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto R-Q S-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
Verified this to
, and a closing +++
+++ running mail +++
[paul@chowder ~]$ mail
Heirloom Mail version 12.5 7/5/10. Type ? for help.
/var/spool/mail/paul: 2 messages
1 Paul Allen Newell Sun Aug 21 18:17 24/897 chowder to
chalupa as
2 Mail Delivery Subsys Sun Aug 21 18:17 73/2566 Returned mail:
see tr
1
On 8/21/2011 9:44 PM, Craig White wrote:
I really don't have much interest in ploughing through all of your e-mails
and all of the answers you get which just confuse the whole situation.
All you really need to do is set smarthost on all of the LAN machines -
all machines smarthost
On 8/19/2011 1:28 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
In all three cases, the return was:
+++
telnet: connect to address 192.168.2.0: Connection refused
Is this a typo? Did it say
telnet: connect to address 192.168.2.10: Connection refused
Rick:
Typo ... the keyboard 1 sometimes fails to connect.
On 8/19/2011 12:15 AM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
Multiple replies received and I am going through them
Thanks,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 8/18/2011 9:49 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Your earlier email indicates that to solve the mail/mailx between
machines, I need comment out that line in sendmail.mc and I will get
the results you indicated. Sure worth a try, let me give it a go.
Craig:
I comment out the 127.0.0.1 line
On 8/16/2011 7:43 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 22:04 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Do you really have:
NTPSERVERARGS=iburst
In the /etc/sysconfig/network file?
Yes, that seems to be part of the factory install or it is something
that I have no idea how I added it when I
To all who have replied to my query/queries:
Someone asked me about whether I could telnet to myself ... I can't find
that email (though I know I have it since I haven't deleted any on this
thread).
That being said, I am not certain what exact test I was asked to run. My
memory is that it had
On 8/18/2011 1:48 AM, Tim wrote:
Well, your original post had two sets of IPs mentioned:
192.168.10.x and 192.168.2.y
Did a typo creep in, so they should have all started with 192.168.2 and
only the last quad was unique for each device?
TYPO !!! My apologies, I did a proof read and
On 8/18/2011 1:32 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 08/18/2011 07:33 AM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Paul Allen Newellpnew...@cs.cmu.edu
wrote:
On 8/17/2011 12:49 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
I would have just duplicated the ssh rule, which works, for port 23.
-A INPUT
On 8/17/2011 11:55 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
Based on the above you have one subnet of 192.168.2.0/24
http://192.168.2.0/24 with 192.168.2.3 as the gateway.
Yes
I think there was some confusion when you mentioned firewall rules on
your router. Traffic between hosts on the same subnet do
On 8/17/2011 10:42 PM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
An additional thing to check is if you are listening on port 23 (or 25).
Try netstat -tnlp and search :23 (or :25). You will find the
name of the process listening. Check if it is listening on 0:0:0.0 or
just on 127.0.0.1. The 127.0.0.1 would be
On 8/18/2011 8:59 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 20:15 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
of course - you have it right.
Whew, that's good to know (smile)
Of course a telnet server would generally use the well-known TCP port 23
but generally usage of this is discouraged
On 8/18/2011 9:07 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 20:47 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
[root@yoyo ~]# netstat -anp | grep :25
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 1510/sendmail: acce
[root@yoyo ~]# netstat -anp | grep :23
[root@yoyo
On 8/18/2011 9:23 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 8/18/2011 9:07 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 20:47 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I am not certain how the word {Disarmed} got into the subject ???
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 8/17/2011 10:33 PM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
Two things:
First, try without any firewall (service iptables stop), or enter a
first line like: iptables -I INPUT -j ACCEPT, just so we can isolate
the problem.
If that fails, look what actually gets send on the server (tcpdump -i
eth0 -nnl
On 8/18/2011 9:33 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 21:31 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
telnet chalupa 23
telnet chalupa 25
telnet chalupa
first and third are essentially the same
second one because chalupa isn't listening on port 25 - at least not on
any 192.168.2.x
To all those who have replied to my questions and wanted to know the
why/what of my set-up as an aid to figuring out what I am trying to do:
Though familiar with Unix/Linux for a long time, it has always been as a
software developer with good sysAdmins to deal with all that stuff.
When I first
On 8/16/2011 10:51 PM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
I have been going through all the responses I got so far and am now in
process of going through this. I can't test the 127.0.0.1 as I've got my
systems somewhat horked trying to sort things out ... after this email I
am backing everything up to
On 8/16/2011 7:52 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1440 /mnt/floppy
See URL:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/fedora-35/fedora-13-mounting-floppy-813466/
Worked for me on F13. Cannot speak for later versions.
I am off floppys at this point, but I'd be curious to
partial answers to two replies ...
On 8/17/2011 6:07 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
May I suggest inserting an entry, at this spot, for mail, something like the
following.
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT
The goal of the previous line is to jump to ACCEPT for any mail
On 8/17/2011 6:07 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
iptables entries are processed in the order found...
[...]
I apologize for not reading your original message and going off on a
telnet/ssh
tangent in a previous email.
Rick:
Thanks for the explanation. Though I had gotten a good 70% of it, the
On 8/17/2011 12:49 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 08/17/2011 08:25 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
One of the interesting things is I am now getting
connection refused rather than no route to host and I need to see
what change I made caused that (which is also interesting as I would
have expected
inline and at bottom ...
On 8/17/2011 6:36 AM, Tim wrote:
The original poster isn't trying to telnet, they're using the the
telnet client as a diagnostic tool for other services.
correct
Ping works great between all of the machines for bothotherX and
otherX.localdomain, lists the
On 8/17/2011 10:42 PM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
You just pinpointed why you can not telnet (port 23) or reach port 25.
Andre:
I just got your two email replies and am going through them. There is
one earlier test regarding 127.0.0.1 that someone requested that I want
to get the results out
[no content from sender in this message?]
On 8/15/2011 11:09 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
Sent from Android mobile
On Aug 16, 2011 6:04 AM, Paul Allen Newell pnew...@cs.cmu.edu
mailto:pnew...@cs.cmu.edu wrote:
Greetings
I am trying to figure out how to get communication between my F14 boxes
On 8/15/2011 11:13 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
It seems that the telnet problem is a simpler one than the mail/mailx
and if I can at least get telnet working, then I am closer to getting
mail/mailx working.
Any suggestions?
1) Why telnet? SSH is much more secure and should work out the
301 - 400 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
