Hi, all.
Could anybody tell me where Fedora's Backup program writes its logs to?
Any help appreciated.
Cheers,
Phil...
--
currently (ab)using
Arch Linux, CentOS 6.5, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora 19 20, OS X
Snow Leopard, RHEL 7, Ubuntu Saucy
GnuGPG Key :
Hi, all.
I know this has been discussed on here before but I'm struggling to stop
'yumBackend.py' hogging the CPU sending the load averages over 2.00.
I've disabled it via the GUI in Software rebooted but it's still
running every five minutes.
Is there a way of dealing with this via the
On 23/01/14 18:49, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all.
I know this has been discussed on here before but I'm struggling to stop
'yumBackend.py' hogging the CPU sending the load averages over 2.00.
I've disabled it via
On 15/12/13 09:16, Bob Goodwin wrote:
This is an error message I have not had before:
[root@box10 bobg]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00:00
fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 18 kB 00:00:00
fedora | 3.8 kB 00:00:00
rpmfusion-free-rawhide
On 13/12/13 09:54, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:45:30 -0800
Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Asked and answered
Read the previous threads which also mention yum groups.
I too have this problem despite searching for 'yum groups' on list, I
cannot find
On 13/12/13 19:43, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 13/12/13 09:54, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:45:30 -0800
Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Asked and answered
Read the previous threads which also mention yum groups.
I too have this problem despite searching
On 10/11/13 01:53, Javier Perez wrote:
Hi
Could somebody recommend a program to view logs like Xorg.0.log, dmesg,
boot.log, messages and others
I use lnav:
https://github.com/tstack/lnav
Recommended.
Cheers,
Phil...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 26/05/13 02:00, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've got several machines on a LAN behind a NAT with DHCP assigning
always the same addresses from a dynamic IP.
A couple of days ago the IP changed since then, one of the machines
running Fedora 17 always fails first time to connect
Hi,
I've been using Fedora 19 quite happily for a while now but today when I
booted her I got an error message along the lines of '62: No operating
system found' she refused to boot.
I'm guessing it's a Grub problem but I've no clue as to go about doing
requisite repair work, even after
On 25/09/13 18:40, Jan Litwiński wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-25, o godz. 18:19:06
Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.com napisał(a):
Hi,
I've been using Fedora 19 quite happily for a while now but today
when I booted her I got an error message along the lines of '62: No
operating system found' she
Hi, all.
I've just tried to install Fedora 19 over the top of CentOS I.(e.
erasing Centos) I can't figure out how to do it. There's no option for
erase install as with other distros.
Could anybody point me in the right direction?
Cheers, Phil...
--
users mailing list
On 09/21/2013 03:35 PM, poma wrote:
On 21.09.2013 15:57, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've just tried to install Fedora 19 over the top of CentOS I.(e.
erasing Centos) I can't figure out how to do it. There's no option for
erase install as with other distros.
Could anybody point me
I'm trying to upgrade 17 - 18 I keep getting this message:
' $ sudo fedup-cli --network 18
setting up repos...
default-installrepo/metalink | 34 kB 00:00:00
fedora/18/i386/metalink | 34 kB 00:00:00
No upgrade available for the following repos: fedora updates
Error: can't get boot
On 21/09/13 23:13, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade 17 - 18 I keep getting this message:
' $ sudo fedup-cli --network 18
setting up repos...
default-installrepo/metalink | 34 kB 00:00:00
fedora/18/i386/metalink | 34 kB 00:00:00
No upgrade available for the following repos
On 05/27/2013 04:51 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 May 2013, Timothy Murphy sent:
As a matter of interest, how do you configure DHCP
to work with a dynamic IP?
Um, generally you don't... It does that by default. Your DHCP client
(your usual personal computer) asks a DHCP
On 05/26/2013 02:21 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/25/2013 06:00 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I've got several machines on a LAN behind a NAT with DHCP assigning
always the same addresses from a dynamic IP.
A couple of days ago the IP changed since then, one of the machines
running Fedora 17 always
On 05/26/2013 11:54 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On 05/25/2013 08:00 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've got several machines on a LAN behind a NAT with DHCP assigning
always the same addresses from a dynamic IP.
A couple of days ago the IP changed since then, one of the machines
On 05/26/2013 02:54 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On 05/26/2013 07:18 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 05/26/2013 11:54 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On 05/25/2013 08:00 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've got several machines on a LAN behind a NAT with DHCP assigning
always the same addresses
On 05/26/2013 02:54 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
[...]
Dumb question - have you checked the network connection? See if
changing the cable or the port on the switch helps. It seams strange
that the external IP address changing would cause this, but for some
strange reason hardware problems
Hi, all.
I've got several machines on a LAN behind a NAT with DHCP assigning
always the same addresses from a dynamic IP.
A couple of days ago the IP changed since then, one of the machines
running Fedora 17 always fails first time to connect to the network:
launch Thunderbird, no start screen,
On 04/24/2013 05:55 PM, poma wrote:
On 24.04.2013 16:17, Regina Anger wrote:
Hello Ed,
Yes, it has been mentioned on the test list several times.
It has been suggested to try adding 'slub_debug=-' to the kernel parameters.
Thx a lot, works now like a charme :)
On 04/24/2013 10:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 23:21, schrieb Phil Dobbin:
On 04/24/2013 05:55 PM, poma wrote:
On 24.04.2013 16:17, Regina Anger wrote:
Hello Ed,
Yes, it has been mentioned on the test list several times.
It has been suggested to try adding 'slub_debug
on a minimal/server though on the Dell.
Cheers,
Phil...
On 4/8/2013 9:09 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
As a coda to this, I installed 17 in a VM via the network install then
grabbed FedUp from Testing ran it.
Three hours later it completed, rebooted all was well. This was, of
course
On 04/09/2013 11:08 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Apr 9, 2013 6:54 AM, Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.com
mailto:bukowskis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/2013 05:39 AM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
What brand of VM???
KVM running on Fedora 17 64-bit on a Lenovo ThinkCentre. I also used KVM
As a coda to this, I installed 17 in a VM via the network install then
grabbed FedUp from Testing ran it.
Three hours later it completed, rebooted all was well. This was, of
course, a completely clean distro (I only installed git grabbed my
dotfiles off of GitHub before running FedUp).
Hi, all.
I've been away for some weeks am now back so I'm looking at
possibilities for upgrading 17 - 18 seeing as 17 will be EOL in around
eight to ten weeks.
After the initial problems with FedUp, I read last night over on
Bugzilla about its progress the latest testing (which looks like it's
On 04/06/2013 03:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/06/2013 03:05 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've been away for some weeks am now back so I'm looking at
possibilities for upgrading 17 - 18 seeing as 17 will be EOL in around
eight to ten weeks.
After the initial problems with FedUp
On 04/06/2013 09:28 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 04/06/2013 03:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/06/2013 03:05 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've been away for some weeks am now back so I'm looking at
possibilities for upgrading 17 - 18 seeing
On 01/28/2013 10:35 PM, Roger wrote:
I have run into a gotcha with the ISP which will not provide Rails 3 on
a shared server.
Can someone please enlighten me as to why not. What are the problems?
Apologies for OT but google so far doesn't help.
I had a similar situation I just started
Hi, all.
I've been watching the developments regarding everybody trying to
upgrade via FedUp can anyone advise me whether issuing:
'sudo fedup-cli —network 18 —debuglog fedupdebug.log'
is still the recommended way to approach the upgrade?
I'm running a rock solid Fedora 17 with all updates
On 01/17/2013 01:59 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:41:41AM +, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I've been watching the developments regarding everybody trying to
upgrade via FedUp can anyone advise me whether issuing:
'sudo fedup-cli —network 18 —debuglog fedupdebug.log
On 01/15/2013 04:09 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I have two different F-18 installs to deal with.
F-18 beta upgraded almost daily, once more just now, do I need to do
any more than that?
and
This F-17 XFCE Live install which is configured the way I want
On 01/15/2013 04:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:27 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
How do I use fedup to update f17-f18 (via net)?
I tried:
sudo fedup --network 18
setting up repos...
default-installrepo/metalink | 26 kB 00:00
On 01/12/2013 07:50 PM, William Brown wrote:
Anyone has a clue please?
As I'm suspecting it's using the BIOS emulation (how to check??), I'd
like to try booting it as a real EFI OS but I have no clue of how
that would work, and couldn't find much literature on this subject, at
least not
Hi, all.
Would I be right in thinking that tonight (at 20:00 UTC) is the Go/NoGo
Meeting to determine whether Fedora 18 is released next Tuesday the Eight?
Cheers,
Phil...
--
currently (ab)using
CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical,
Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow
On 01/01/2013 11:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 23:40:28 +
Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all.
Would I be right in thinking that tonight (at 20:00 UTC) is the
Go/NoGo Meeting to determine whether Fedora 18 is released next
Tuesday the Eight?
Nope
On 12/27/2012 11:20 AM, Mark Klein wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am Mark Klein, a 14-year-old high school student from Honolulu,
Hawaii. (UTC-10)
I am participating in the Google Code-In contest and for my task[0], I
designed an android application[1] for Planet Fedora[2], which is a
website
On 12/19/2012 01:42 AM, Jim wrote:
Fedora 17
Compiling failed, could someone give me a ideal what caused the failure.
#sh run.sh
running install
running build
cc -I/usr/include/ffmpeg -c
/home/mickey/Downloads/Miro-5/miro-5.0/linux/miro-segmenter.c -o
On 12/17/2012 03:30 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/16/2012 07:12 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
OMG!...incredible!
Why? Granted, it was back in 1968, but the computer I was working on
(IBM 1620, MOD 2) was already outdated, and nearly obsolete.
My brother (he's eleven years older than I
On 12/17/2012 11:02 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 12/17/2012 05:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/17/2012 04:11 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 12/16/2012 10:30 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/16/2012 07:12 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
OMG!...incredible!
Why? Granted, it was
On 12/16/2012 08:47 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 11:18 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Unless you think you have a chance of being singled out by a goverment
or if you don't trust some of the people/machines on your local
network, this isn't a significant risk.
You don't think some
On 12/16/2012 10:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/16/2012 02:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
http://ohjeezlinux.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/fedup-a-little-background/
(this link is referenced on the Fedup Wiki page).
Thanx. Alas, the first paragraph contains a gross error that tells me
just
On 12/15/2012 05:18 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 09:53 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 12/15/2012 09:07 AM, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 13:08 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
preupgrade is going away in f18.
It's being replaced by fedup.
On 12/10/2012 12:59 PM, Henrik Frisk wrote:
Hi,
I have now migrated to Fedora 17 (clean install) and configured and
installed most of what I need. Though I think everything looks very
good my computer is considerably less responsive than under fedora 13.
I haven't worked that much yet but
On 12/06/2012 06:04 PM, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I just completed an F-17 install. I choosed the customize now option
and ask to not install texlive, but texlive is installed.
Is it possible to have an install without texlive?
I use texlive, but fedora package for texlive is
On 12/03/2012 07:58 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
How does one set a mail. filter in thunderbird? I want mail from the
users list, for example tp gp into the users folder.
I find the easiest method is to create your mailbox folder that you wish
to filter messages into first (or use an existing
On 12/01/2012 06:37 AM, Brian West wrote:
Hello everyone I'd like to hear any suggestions you may have when it
comes to a good book to learn the features of fedora. while there are
countless books that teach you how to use linux in the general way.
each distribution has its own unique set
On 11/26/2012 04:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I did the minimal install on my ee701. At least the first attempt.
I set my swap at 768Mb, and left /boot at 500Mb (probably could shrink
this next time). This left 2.7Gb for /
That swap will be too small for hibernate
So a minimal
On 11/26/2012 04:54 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 11/26/2012 04:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I did the minimal install on my ee701. At least the first attempt.
I set my swap at 768Mb, and left /boot at 500Mb (probably could shrink
this next
On 11/19/2012 12:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Indeed. Most of the time they are not going to give a crap about a
simple abuse report, let alone do anything to stop spam/bruteforcing.
Maybe the American and British ISPs but not the others.
The ISPs are mostly not in the loop, but some of them
On 11/18/2012 11:16 PM, Roger wrote:
Is there any way to trace ip addresses back past the originating ISP.
I've been using whois but it seems limited.
I use nmap http://nmap.org then Google does the rest.
Cheers,
Phil...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Yashar Pezeshki wrote:
Why not try to install it using yum, and then reply if you you got any
problem?!! :D
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Rafnews raf.n...@gmail.com
mailto:raf.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if someone already installed MySQL on Fedora 17
Rafnews wrote:
Hi,
i discovered that i can use fedora 17 on my old laptop IBM T42.
i works great but my wireless adapter doesn't work.
i found several websites (e.g.:
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw2200.shtml) where some steps are
written how to make it works...however in my
Rafnews wrote:
On 28.10.2012 15:03, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Rafnews wrote:
Hi,
i discovered that i can use fedora 17 on my old laptop IBM T42.
i works great but my wireless adapter doesn't work.
i found several websites (e.g.:
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/linux/fc2-ipw2200.shtml) where some
Digimer wrote:
On 10/19/2012 06:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:01:19PM -0400, David wrote:
I had this 'fixed' about two weeks ago and then you Newbies opened the
sluice gate. Can't fix *your* email? At least please don't re-swan it
for those of us that can.
Hey,
Manuel Escudero wrote:
Can someone help me with this question in #AskFedora?:
http://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/2620/zencoding-in-fedora-with-geditgmate
According to the only other hit in Google apart from your question:
$ sudo yum install python-pygments
Untested. HTH.
Cheers,
Phil Dobbin wrote:
After the last kernel upgrade (= 3.5.3-1) notifications in Byobu ceased
to work (amongst other things: an existing kvm machine no longer works
as Nautilus keeps crashing when it's launched so I had to re-install that).
I've tried reverting back to 5.17 with no luck
Hi, all.
After the last kernel upgrade (= 3.5.3-1) notifications in Byobu ceased
to work (amongst other things: an existing kvm machine no longer works
as Nautilus keeps crashing when it's launched so I had to re-install that).
I've tried reverting back to 5.17 with no luck (both via Yum
Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Ok so after scouring this site called DistroWatch.which has a
MILLION different versions of Linux I've decided to go with:
PeppermintOS - laptop
Ubuntu LTS - desktop
Fedora laptop
Linux Mint desktop
PC-BSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:27:22AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I have both Beefy on a desktop machine a laptop. On the desktop
variety, `yum update` works fine but on the laptop it's always throwing
errors (timing out, 401s, etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, all.
I have both Beefy on a desktop machine a laptop. On the desktop
variety, `yum update` works fine but on the laptop it's always throwing
errors (timing out, 401s, etc).
The laptop was upgraded from 12 - 15 - 16 - 17 using preupgrade as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/01/2012 07:27 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I have both Beefy on a desktop machine a laptop. On the desktop
variety, `yum update` works fine but on the laptop it's always
throwing errors (timing out, 401s, etc).
The laptop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Wendel wrote:
On 07/29/2012 10:09 PM, Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor wrote:
Hello all,
Just thought about asking you guys what the actual name is, Linux or
GNU/Linux (In our Bangladeshi community, we're really divided on this
issue).
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:33:34 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
This behaviour is clearly a bug. Not because it takes so long time,
but because the user isn't informed and waits speculating about what
went wrong and when to push
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:42:56 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I started using Fedora starting with Constantine the hang always seems
to happen at 'selinux-policy-targeted' which is understandable when
using preupgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neal Becker wrote:
I'm wondering if I can use nfsv4 idmap so that I can share files between
systems
without syncing uids.
Thing is, I don't want to have to learn kerberos, ldap, etc.
Is it possible to use idmap functionality without any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fedora 18:
`grubby fatal error unable to find a suitable template'
Cheers,
Phil...
- --
currently (ab)using
CentOS 6.2, Debian Squeeze, Fedora Beefy, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Precise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/06/12 07:16, Roger wrote:
After all the hype, problems and dislikes with Fedora 17, I am
interested to know is it worth fresh installing over Fedora 16 or
would it be best to wait a month or so?
I've both upgraded from Verne - Beefy via
On 05/27/2012 08:45 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I've Googled this question quite extensively before I proceed I
thought I'd ask for an opinion. It's quite a common predicament so
apologies in advance if I'm creating noise.
I have a machine running Fedora 16 X86_64 which is a recent addition
now
Hi, all.
I've Googled this question quite extensively before I proceed I
thought I'd ask for an opinion. It's quite a common predicament so
apologies in advance if I'm creating noise.
I have a machine running Fedora 16 X86_64 which is a recent addition
now I need to use some of the unused
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/05/12 21:44, Max Pyziur wrote:
Hoping to at least be on the trailing edge, I've started an
upgrade process on my Dell Laptop Inspiron 600m.
It is currently running F15, and I'd like to upgrade to F16.
However, after going through the
On 06/05/12 22:50, JD wrote:
Hi All,
Without dissing or criticizing gnome3, I must say
I have nothing but problems with using it.
For example, selecting the Gnome, or the Classic Gnome
desktop manager, I can no longer see the desktop in other
workspaces that I created, except workspace 1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*n.b.* I originally sent this as a c.c. to the list but it doesn't seem
to have happened...
On 21/03/2012 21:47, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Mar2012 11:48, Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.com wrote: |
Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au | On 21Mar2012
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au
Date:
21/03/2012 00:24
To:
Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 21Mar2012 00:49, suvayu ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
| Well from my experience when I subscribed to this list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/03/2012 13:02, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:48:29 +,
Phil Dobbin bukowskis...@gmail.com wrote:
Digest mode is perfectly acceptable for use when searching for
relevant topics but a bore when replying. Mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Re: Fedora 14 Gnome 2 to Fedora 16 KDE.emlSubject: Re: Fedora 14 Gnome 2
to Fedora 16 KDEFrom: n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.comDate: 02/03/2012 00:23To:
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/03/12 22:31, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Hi, all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, all.
I've been using Fedora 14 (i686) on an old IBM Think Pad T42 after
swapping from Debian Squeeze am really enjoying the experience.
Fedora 14 having reached EOL, I'm looking to upgrade but at present I'm
running Gnome 2 16 uses Gnome 3.
77 matches
Mail list logo
