Kevin Fenzi writes:
> We don't currently have any ARC setup.
Well, I can't promise it will have great effect, although I know from
the design and implementation discussions that Google takes it
seriously, and Microsoft implements it. So it's just a suggestion for
"your copious free time".
>
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> I can't force the list to do this. Your domain would need to enable
> DMARC and set reject or quarantine
Pretty sure it's not "his" domain. I believe GMX is a major internet
provider (and email provider) in Germany, which already has an
explicit DMARC policy of 'none' on
Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes:
> Here we are again: because shortly after sending the message at the
> very end of this forwarded message I got the message attached
> below.
>
> One thing that y.antoniowat...@gmail.com (see below)
I think y.antoniowatson is possibly a victim as well, because of
Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:12:21PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> >You''ll notice that my messages don't come from my address, but the
> >list server has changed them to:
> >
> > Tim via users
> >
> >And I see the same for some other people.
> >
> >I think
Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
> People who interact with the forum via email will still have their own
> copies. And current email archives can be altered just as easily
> (though I don't know of any that do so).
I don't know anybody who regularly retro-mods their archives for
reasons of taste,
Patrick Dupre writes:
> 1 warning generated.
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/test-52cb2b.o: in function `main':
> test.c:(.text+0x1b): undefined reference to `CMPLX'
> clang-14: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
> invocation)
Since the compiler produces a .o but the linker
Thomas Cameron writes:
> But my point is, setting up spf works as expected. I've verified it via
> my emails to known correctly configured mail servers like GMail. What I
> don't understand is why, when it is apparently set up correctly, are
> there mail servers which throw errors when I
Thomas Cameron writes:
> But then, when I do something like send email to this list, I suddenly
> get a TON of error messages saying that the email failed spf tests
> because it's coming from the server of the mailing list instead of my
> email server. Is that normal?
I would guess the
Jonathan Billings writes:
> There are several features in systemd that directly benefit the
> desktop.
Sure, but the ones you mention don't benefit me and people like me. I
can't imagine why I would even notice them on my personal desktop.
The odd man out (and thank you for mentioning
Michael Hennebry writes:
> The point seems to have been missed.
The same could be said here, but it would be valid.
> The primary salutary effect of a *collective*
> decision would be on prospective smokers,
> e.g. children.
You make me curious what experience in open source maintenance
Michael Hennebry writes:
> I also know of no technical argument on the
> fedora forum that persuaded fedora's authors.
As far as I know there isn't really a technical argument for systemd
or any particular systemd.* on Fedora workstations. The various
traditional inits and daemons work fine
Cameron Simpson writes:
> >How does one get the bash environment reloaded without logging out and
> >logging in ? $source ? $exec bash ? ./bash ?
>
> If your terminals run login shells, opening a new terminal will do. For
> that terminal, of course.
>
> Or you can source your
D writes:
> env shows :0.0. I have tried several variations:
> export DISPLAY=:0
> export DISPLAY=:0.0
> export DISPLAY=:0.1
The first two should work, not sure about the second. I would check
the following:
1. Is there actually a firefox executable where the script expects
it? (Note
Tim writes:
> I reckon the default thought of most people who're suddenly faced with
> a computer failing a security test is not going to be that something
> has changed on them without authority, but that something has gone
> wrong. They're going to try and reset something, rather than work
Samuel Sieb writes:
> On 2021-07-03 8:02 p.m., dwoody5...@gmail.com wrote:
> > the url I am trying to download does not have an extension ie. no
> > '.htm' such as:
> > https://my.acbl.org/club-results/details/338288
The extension doesn't matter to any of the utilities mentioned as far
as I
Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
> In the case of Windows 11 under a VM, as you say the software TPM can do
> what it likes. In effect, there is no more guarantee than with a system
> without a TPM and the message that Windows 11 can only be used where a TPM
> provides a trust base might give a
Mike Flannigan writes:
> Thanks for the reply. I tried that but it won't let
> me in. I tried my normal passwords, but I'm thinking
> I did not selected a password when I signed up.
In a stock Mailman you can do a password reset from the login screen
(use the "forgot password" link). Of
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
> A reboot ALWAYS fixes the issue.
That's probably because it reinitializes *all* the data structures, in
the kernel, in system processes, and in user processes. Evidently
clearing state is what fixes your problem.
> I am trying to get around the reboot thing.
Alex Regan writes:
> I'm familiar with how remote ssh tunnels work, but can't quite get
> systemctl to create a proper service, presumably because ssh
> expects to be tied to a terminal.
I did this a long time ago, so visualize me waving my hands
frantically. You presumably want the "-n"
Ranjan Maitra writes:
> So, I use in my .procmailrc:
>
> :0:
> *^From.*u...@outlook.com
> $HOME/Mail/sent/.
>
> And it used to work fine. However, recently I have also started
> forwarding my e-mail from the address: u...@outlook.com and what is
> happening is that the e-mail envelope
Ranjan Maitra writes:
> So, I use in my .procmailrc:
>
> :0:
> *^From.*u...@outlook.com
> $HOME/Mail/sent/.
>
> And it used to work fine. However, recently I have also started
> forwarding my e-mail from the address: u...@outlook.com and what is
> happening is that the e-mail envelope
Tom Horsley writes:
> The most reproducible one is claws-mail which always
> takes 25 seconds to start, and the delay seems to be
> something to do with dbus messages. Here's some
> debug-monitor output that shows the delay:
30s is a common timeout for Internet functions, such as DNS. I
Tom Horsley writes:
> Some of the messages show the international characters,
In this thread, those are Ed's.
> and some do not.
Tim's.
> It would be interesting to examine the detailed headers of the
> message where the characters disappeared,
I looked in my local folder, and there's
Ed Greshko writes:
> Yes. For some reason I can't fathom it seems the mailing list
> software turns every Content-Transfer-Encoding to base64
It's just "old fashioned stupidity" far beyond the ken of today's
users inexperienced with the details of the global mail system. Let
me explain.
Please do not reply to this mail; join mailman3-users instead.
Tim writes:
> It's likely due to Google's anti-spam technique falling afoul of how
> this list forwards our messages (written addressed "from" us but coming
> from the list server). While detecting that kind of thing may pick up
25 matches
Mail list logo
