[389-users] Re: IMPORTANT - Fedorahosted trac ticket system is being replaced by Pagure

I guess you didn't like redmine, gitlab, mattermost, the Atlassian stack, or some others out there :)? It looks neat. So the question is why this and not anything else :)? Maybe not the question you expected, but I am just curious. Greetings, Vincent On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Mark

[389-users] Re: ldapsearch doesn't return the userpassword field

anks for the link! It's much appreciated. I'm afraid my PHP skills > leave a lot to be desired did I mention I > hate PHP? ;-) > > > > On 2/23/16 1:14 AM, Vincent Gerris wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a script I used with 389 that worked fine for me a while back: &

[389-users] Re: ldapsearch doesn't return the userpassword field

Hi, Here is a script I used with 389 that worked fine for me a while back: http://ltb-project.org/wiki/documentation/self-service-password Greetings, Vincent On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:25 AM, William Brown wrote: > Ignore the blank message. Email fail. > > On Mon,

Re: [389-users] Automating a 389 DS Build

there is also one here: https://github.com/rs-services/cookbooks_internal/tree/master/cookbooks/DS389 I modified one of them to completely setup and install 389-DS in a clustered setup, but can't find the recipe :). I will post it if I find it. Good luck! On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:02 PM, David

Re: [389-users] Point-in-time Recovery

Replication of accounts is always a challenge :). What I have seen being used is the Retro changelog mechanism. A script will poll for changes and keep track of what has been processed and synced to the other side. Where are the accounts originally created? I get the idea the source is your Oracle

Re: [389-users] Comnsole admin on Windows

there is a windows installer included? Or you can use X for windows and connect to the admin server with an X forward and start it. check: http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/ or for a nice ssh with intgrted X : http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/ good luck On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:55 PM,

Re: [389-users] Header menu display issue in DSGW

If you mean that the layout is messed up, you are right. It is terrible and looks different on about any browser. I filed a bug for the ubuntu package where I found it too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/389-dsgw/+bug/1286035 There has been no reaction yet, it actually should have been

Re: [389-users] Header menu display issue in DSGW

Thank you for help and your work! I might send a mail to this list again when the time comes and I need some guidance :). On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/07/2014 08:37 AM, Vincent Gerris wrote: I would love to patch it, but like I tried

Re: [389-users] 389 -- Client Console to Remote 389 Server -- StatusPing Connection Refused

then please share how you fixed it or what the issue was, so other people that encounter this can solve it. There is not much more frustrating then thinking you find a solution, only to read someone fixed it. thank you On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:25 PM, g.fer.or...@unicyber.co.uk wrote: Hi

Re: [389-users] Password too similar to old one

Well I just like to note that you SHOULD NOT want to use a password like that. It's completely insecure and thus a very BAD idea from a security perspective. As far as I know, you can override a directory wide password policy per account, so if the restrictions come from there, just change them

Re: [389-users] LAN vs WAN

well it is mounted on the WAN so it is accessible there right? NFS is by the way not the best way for a secure file share. But what has this to do with 389? Seems like a general networking question to me and it depends mostly on what is done in terms of firewalling. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at

Re: [389-users] Sun One 5.2 to 389 DS

and boom, looks like it works now. On 03/17/2014 04:08 PM, Vincent Gerris wrote: yes, I did before. You need to copy some legacy schema stuff, for the rest it is pretty straight forward. Just make an ldif dump, setup the new directory server and try an import. You will encounter any

Re: [389-users] Sun One 5.2 to 389 DS

yes, I did before. You need to copy some legacy schema stuff, for the rest it is pretty straight forward. Just make an ldif dump, setup the new directory server and try an import. You will encounter any missing stuff by trial and error. check the log files and see how you go :). On Mon, Mar 17,

Re: [389-users] error log showing Detected Disorderly Shutdown on startup

I encountered a similar issue. I got it when creating an index with the vlvindex command, which was apparently not correct. The index creation failed with a segfault and after that I could not start the server anymore. I was also unable to do deletion of the index, since ldap was not up. The error

Re: [389-users] dual change log entry with retro changelog plugin

I verified this behaviour is still present in Fedora 389 Directory Server 1.2.6. On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Vincent Gerris vger...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I think I found it, it seems a bug to me. With audit logging enabled, I noticed a difference in output in the output log when

Re: [389-users] dual change log entry with retro changelog plugin

Hi Thierry, Agreed that it might be handy, but we have no password policy enabled. Thus, these actions should not be enabled imho. Any way to disable it? Thanks, Kind regards, Vincent On 24 May 2013 19:04, thierry bordaz tbor...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/24/2013 04:16 PM, Vincent Gerris wrote

Re: [389-users] dual change log entry with retro changelog plugin

password policy. Googling did not help either. Any help is greatly appreciated! On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Vincent Gerris vger...@gmail.com wrote: I verified this behaviour is still present in Fedora 389 Directory Server 1.2.6. On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Vincent Gerris vger

Re: [389-users] Backup Directory Server by db2bak.pl script

hi, I noticed this entry when trying to use the db2bak.pl script. I found out that the -a option only works when for example the /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-server/bak or a subdir is used (effectively) the same dir as without the -a option. I was using a root dir, which I also modded with nobody:nobody

Re: [389-users] Backup Directory Server by db2bak.pl script

it helps others too :). Greetings Vincent On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/13/2013 09:09 AM, Vincent Gerris wrote: hi, I noticed this entry when trying to use the db2bak.pl script. I found out that the -a option only works when for example