Re: Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

do you mean to change the location (the directory) of the script ? On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:57 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > I updated Firefox to version 49, and now I can

Re: Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 18:57 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I updated Firefox to version 49, and now I can run it clicking on the > program name from a "nautilus" window. > > But It is difficult for me, now, to create a symbolic link in order to run > firefox using

Create a symbolic link to run firefox 49 ..

Hi, I updated Firefox to version 49, and now I can run it clicking on the program name from a "nautilus" window. But It is difficult for me, now, to create a symbolic link in order to run firefox using the graphical environment of gnome. This is because it *(already) **exists **a f

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

I found somethig interesting to this link : https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/update-firefox-latest-version Update Firefox to the latest version By default, Firefox is set to automatically update itself but you can always do a manual update. Here's how: *Note:* If you use your Linux

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

Hi Francois, I also thought something like what you said..., but I took a look to the unpacked files ... there I found some files that look to be able to work good in order to configure firefox...: - updater.ini - updater - precomplete - removed-files - platform.ini

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

Le 29/09/2016 16:30, Angelo Moreschini a écrit : > thank you to answering me, > > I re installed firefox because it didn't work for all the graphic > plugins that was required > > (before that with the .tar file) I tried also with yum to get the file > from repository,

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 17:30 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I use Fedora 21, and I wouldn't TRY to re install fedora in order to change > only firefox... You should. F21 was EOLed over a year ago so it has significant security bugs that will not be fixed. You really ought to upgrade to at

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

wering me, > > I re installed firefox because it didn't work for all the graphic plugins > that was required > > (before that with the .tar file) I tried also with yum to get the file > from repository, but I get only a old version that didn't solve my > problem... And usi

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

thank you to answering me, I re installed firefox because it didn't work for all the graphic plugins that was required (before that with the .tar file) I tried also with yum to get the file from repository, but I get only a old version that didn't solve my problem... And using .tar file I

Re: Installing programs in fedora - firefox

On 09/29/16 21:49, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > recently I re installed firefox (in order to have the new firefox 49). > > Till now, to install programs, I always used yum or rpm, and never I used the > .tar file. > You seem to be getting firefox directly from Mozilla? Why

Installing programs in fedora - firefox

Hi, recently I re installed firefox (in order to have the new firefox 49). Till now, to install programs, I always used yum or rpm, and never I used the .tar file. After I unpacked the .tar file, I was immediately able to run the new version of firefox simply creating a new symbolic link point

Re: Firefox slow to recognize inputs after screen unlock

On 09/24/2016 09:28 AM, Javier Perez wrote: After I unolock the screen, firefox seem slow to recognize mouse or keyboard input. There is a period of about three minutes where no matter what I do it will not register with firefox (switch tabs, try to click on link, etc.). Try running top

Re: Firefox slow to recognize inputs after screen unlock

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:05 AM, George N. White III <gnw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Javier Perez <pepeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Has anyone had this problem? >> >> After I unolock the screen, firefox s

Re: Firefox slow to recognize inputs after screen unlock

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Javier Perez <pepeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Has anyone had this problem? > > After I unolock the screen, firefox seem slow to recognize mouse or > keyboard input. There is a period of about three minutes where no matter > wha

Re: Firefox slow to recognize inputs after screen unlock

en. > > > I am using Fedora 24, XFCE ( but I think something similar happened > > also with KDE. > > Linux 4.7.4-200 > > Firefox 48.01 > > > > How can I start troubleshooting this? > > You could search for the problem or open a bug at > > https://bug

Re: Firefox slow to recognize inputs after screen unlock

On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:28:48 -0500 Javier Perez <pepeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone had this problem? I haven't, but I don't lock my screen. > I am using Fedora 24, XFCE ( but I think something similar happened > also with KDE. > Linux 4.7.4-200 > Firefox 48.01

Firefox slow to recognize inputs after screen unlock

Hi Has anyone had this problem? After I unolock the screen, firefox seem slow to recognize mouse or keyboard input. There is a period of about three minutes where no matter what I do it will not register with firefox (switch tabs, try to click on link, etc.). I can switch and move windows

Re: firefox huge json files block syncing

formation about this topic. Most of it might be useless to you, but maybe not. They mention that there are plugins for firefox and chrome to edit json. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12063626 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription

firefox huge json files block syncing

Hello I am sure I am not alone w/ this issue, I have a very huge logins.json file, it's not absolutely huge, it's 1,3 MBytes, but it's huge enough to hang firefox when I try to purge old used (last used sort column) password. I could survive with it, of course, but the side effect is that my

Re: bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?

On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:22 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Getting rid of the problem by deactivating "Use Tracking Protection in > Private Windows" in the firefox "Privacy" section. Hmm, sounds like a mis-use of the do-not-track flag by bugzilla. I've always c

Re: bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?

On 08/15/16 10:47, Ntlworld wrote: Have you disabled cookies? Getting rid of the problem by deactivating "Use Tracking Protection in Private Windows" in the firefox "Privacy" section. Kind regards Joachim Backes On 15 Aug 2016, at 09:30, Sylvia Sánchez

Re: bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?

Have you disabled cookies? > On 15 Aug 2016, at 09:30, Sylvia Sánchez <lailah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > That's weird... Maybe a setting on your side? I just opened the page and I'm > still logged in despite Firefox was closed since yesterday. > > > Cheers, &g

Re: bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?

That's weird... Maybe a setting on your side? I just opened the page and I'm still logged in despite Firefox was closed since yesterday. Cheers, Sylvia On 15 August 2016 at 09:07, Joachim Backes <joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > since some weeks I have the fo

bugzilla always logs out as of late if leaving a BZ session in firefox?

Hi all, since some weeks I have the following problem with bugzilla page: each time I open a BZ page, I'm prompted to login in BZ again. This happens since some weeks. Does BZ logout automatically if closing the browser (firefox for example)? I never had to re-login to BZ in earlier times

Re: Java Access in Firefox

On 18/05/16 12:06, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 05/17/2016 06:26 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 09/05/16 17:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 05/08/2016 05:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and on both systems Firefox will not activate Java

Re: Java Access in Firefox

On 05/17/2016 06:26 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 09/05/16 17:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 05/08/2016 05:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and on both systems Firefox will not activate Java, this has been the case for several versions

Re: Java Access in Firefox

On 09/05/16 17:58, Fernando Cassia wrote: On 5/8/16, Stephen Morris <samor...@netspace.net.au> wrote: Hi, I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and on both systems Firefox will not activate Java, this has been the case for several versions of Firefox.

Re: Java Access in Firefox

On 09/05/16 17:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 05/08/2016 05:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and on both systems Firefox will not activate Java, this has been the case for several versions of Firefox. I have to java plugin

Re: firefox javascript

at 6:43 PM From: jd1008 <jd1...@gmail.com> To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: firefox javascript On 05/08/2016 05:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, gmx.com fails: Please enable JavaScript to experience the full functionali

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/11/2016 08:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Virtually every security measure is a partial solution. There are no magic bullets. However just because a given measure is weak on its own doesn't mean it isn't useful in combination with others. Using a non- root user for remote login means

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 10:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:30:48 -0700, >   Joe Zeff wrote: > > > > > > Excellent advice.  Linux never tells you if the username you're > > trying  > > to log in with is right, just that the combination of username and  >

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:30:48 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: Excellent advice. Linux never tells you if the username you're trying to log in with is right, just that the combination of username and password was wrong. The only username that a potential cracker knows exists is

Re: firefox javascript

On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 01:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > gmx.com fails: > Please enable JavaScript to experience the full functionality of GMX. > dogpile.com fails: > http://www.ledauphine.com/ fails I can't comment on those particular sites, but with some other sites the error messages are

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

Allegedly, on or about 10 May 2016, Patrick O'Callaghan sent: > Much more important is to keep tight control of logins > from outside your network. Only allow SSH, don't allow it to the root > account, only allow it using token (not password) access, and run > fail2ban. If you run externally

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/10/2016 01:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Much more important is to keep tight control of logins from outside your network. Only allow SSH, don't allow it to the root account, only allow it using token (not password) access, and run fail2ban. Excellent advice. Linux never tells you

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 16:11 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Linux is a bit more impervious to the nefarious actions of the evil > > hackers out there than MacOS and a lot more so that Winblows, but > it > > isn't perfect. If you're surfing the web, wear a full-body condom > or > > two. And always

Re: firefox javascript

ng it. And if you go to news sites, there's a mass of external services that want to be allowed, because the page has incorporated external content from twitter (& other social media), instead of quoting from it. You also find that those pages rapidly become stale, because the incorporated content

Re: firefox javascript

Allegedly, on or about 09 May 2016, Doug sent: > I have seen "complaints" about javascript in Firefox for quite some > time now. I also see that there are very few if any malware exploits > in Linux. So what is the problem? To summarise it in a nutshell: You don't have to

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/09/2016 03:52 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote: 1) If I want to use the plugin package: you must turn off SELinux controls on the Firefox plugins. # setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0 I wouldn't go so far as to reinstall. SELinux has blocked

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/09/2016 03:30 PM, CS DBA wrote: On 05/09/2016 01:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote: Hi All; I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts: The source process

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/09/2016 04:36 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote: Thoughts? Is this a bug? Should I run the setsebool command to allow access? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230052 What plugins do you have installed? Flash? -- users mailing list

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote: Thoughts? Is this a bug? Should I run the setsebool command to allow access? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230052 What plugins do you have installed? Flash? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/09/2016 01:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote: Hi All; I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts: The source process: 57656220436F6E74656E74 Attempted this access

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/09/2016 01:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 20:59:30 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: If I want to access to gmx.com, I did not find any other option than to have javascript enabled. Some web sites are broken. They may be too lazy to make sure their

Re: firefox javascript

Why would anyone buy free software? These guys take free firefox and do some simple tweaks, and sell it??? How lame is that??? The FSF should rightly be outraged. On 05/09/2016 11:24 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: https://www.cyscape.com/showbrow.asp?bhcp=1

Re: SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

On 05/09/2016 12:19 PM, CS DBA wrote: Hi All; I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts: The source process: 57656220436F6E74656E74 Attempted this access: create On this rawip_socket: The alert gives me

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/09/2016 01:59 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: If I want to access to gmx.com, I did not find any other option than to have javascript enabled. I have seen "complaints" about javascript in Firefox for quite some time now. I also see that there are very few if any malware exploits

SELINUX Problem (Firefox Create access on rawip_socket)

Hi All; I'm running Fedora 23 KDE Spin, After a recent firefox update (I'm now at Firefox 46.0.1) I've been getting these SELINUX alerts: The source process: 57656220436F6E74656E74 Attempted this access: create On this rawip_socket: The alert gives me 2 choices: 1) If I want to use

Re: firefox javascript

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 20:59:30 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: If I want to access to gmx.com, I did not find any other option than to have javascript enabled. Some web sites are broken. They may be too lazy to make sure their interface is usable to work without javascipt.

Re: firefox javascript

09, 2016 at 8:33 PM > From: "Bruno Wolff III" <br...@wolff.to> > To: "Patrick Dupre" <pdu...@gmx.com> > Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > >Is there a way to activate the javascripts only for spec

Re: firefox javascript

Is there a way to activate the javascripts only for specific website ? There is an add on that sort of does that. But it turns out, that it needs javascript to do this and there was at least one compromize that worked if javascript was enabled, but blocked by the add on. -- users mailing

Re: firefox javascript

Patrick Dupre" <pdu...@gmx.com> > Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > >> javascript.enabled is in about:config . I set it to false most of the time. > > > >Why ? > > Because javascript is way too powerful to leave o

Re: firefox javascript

javascript.enabled is in about:config . I set it to false most of the time. Why ? Because javascript is way too powerful to leave on when visiting random web sites or sites with third party ads. It greatly increases the attack surface of a web browser both for compromizes and for privacy

Re: firefox javascript

8 <jd1...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:43:22 -0600, > jd1008 <jd1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >I do not see in my FF any settings fo

Re: firefox javascript

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:43:22 -0600, jd1008 wrote: I do not see in my FF any settings for enabling or disabling java, nor javascript. So, where are these 2 settings? JavaScript True JavaScriptEnabled True javascript.enabled is in about:config . I set it to false most

Re: firefox javascript

gmail.com> > To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > > > On 05/08/2016 05:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > gmx.com fails: > > Please enable JavaScript to exp

Re: firefox javascript

; To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: firefox javascript On 05/09/16 06:18, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, No, it is not solved, It looks like that the javascript are not lauched! This happens on 50% of the sites that I used to visi

Re: Java Access in Firefox

On 5/8/16, Stephen Morris <samor...@netspace.net.au> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and > on both systems Firefox will not activate Java, this has been the case > for several versions of Firefox. I have to java plugin

Re: Java Access in Firefox

On 05/08/2016 05:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and on both systems Firefox will not activate Java, this has been the case for several versions of Firefox. I have to java plugin in the appropriate mozilla directories, but Firefox

Java Access in Firefox

Hi, I am currently using Firefox 49.0a1 on both Linux and Windows and on both systems Firefox will not activate Java, this has been the case for several versions of Firefox. I have to java plugin in the appropriate mozilla directories, but Firefox will still not use it. I have also

Re: firefox javascript

=== > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 at 1:05 AM > From: "Ed Greshko" <ed.gres...@greshko.com> > To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > On 05/09/16 06:18, Patrick Dupre wrote: > &

Re: firefox javascript

On May 9, 2016 07:25, "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > > Hello, > > gmx.com fails: > Please enable JavaScript to experience the full functionality of GMX. > dogpile.com fails: > http://www.ledauphine.com/ fails I don't see that message at gmx.com or dogpile. Can't check the other site

Re: firefox javascript

=== > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 at 1:05 AM > From: "Ed Greshko" <ed.gres...@greshko.com> > To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > On

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/09/16 06:18, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > No, it is not solved, It looks like that the javascript are not lauched! > This happens on 50% of the sites that I used to visit ! > That is why I put resolved in quotes What I'm saying is that it is resolved in that you've gone from

Re: firefox javascript

=== > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 at 11:58 PM > From: "Ed Greshko" <ed.gres...@greshko.com> > To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > On 05/09/16 04:04, Patrick Du

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/09/16 04:04, Patrick Dupre wrote: > It did not help, but, now I have: > > JavaScriptEnabled True So, you now have JavaScript True JavaScriptEnabled True Meaning that problem is "resolved". I don't see anything wrong with http://www.gmx.com/ but I also don't have an account so

Re: firefox javascript

m: "Ed Greshko" <ed.gres...@greshko.com> > To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > > > On 05/09/16 03:07, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > http

Re: firefox javascript

t;Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > > > On 05/09/16 03:07, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > https://www.cyscape.com/showbrow.asp > > provides: > > > >

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/09/16 03:07, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > https://www.cyscape.com/showbrow.asp > provides: > > JavaScript True > JavaScriptEnabled false > > Noscript is disabled > The aonly addons that I am using are: > ADblock plus > and > RequestPolicy continued > > about:config >

Re: firefox javascript

pport for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > 2016-05-08 16:34 GMT+02:00, Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com>: > > Hello, > > > > I just update my firefox to 46. > > When I try to connect to dogpile, the jav

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/08/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: I guess that I should wait for a version with fixed bugs. How do I step back to the previous version ? Thank. Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 at 8:31 PM From: jd1008 <jd1...@gmail.com> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: firefox java

Re: firefox javascript

2016-05-08 16:34 GMT+02:00, Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com>: > Hello, > > I just update my firefox to 46. > When I try to connect to dogpile, the javascript does not seem to > be working any more. > I use the option "activate", but it is not enough. Have you chec

Re: firefox javascript

ent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 at 8:31 PM > From: jd1008 <jd1...@gmail.com> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > > > On 05/08/2016 12:18 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > wher

Re: firefox javascript

, May 08, 2016 at 5:33 PM From: jd1008 <jd1...@gmail.com> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: firefox javascript On 05/08/2016 08:34 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I just update my firefox to 46. When I try to connect to dogpile, the javascript does not seem to be working an

Re: firefox javascript

8 <jd1...@gmail.com> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: firefox javascript > > > > On 05/08/2016 08:34 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just update my firefox to 46. > > When I try to connect to dogpile, the javascript does not

Re: firefox javascript

On 05/08/2016 08:34 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I just update my firefox to 46. When I try to connect to dogpile, the javascript does not seem to be working any more. I use the option "activate", but it is not enough. I am the same issue with gmx.com What you I do ? Thank.

firefox javascript

Hello, I just update my firefox to 46. When I try to connect to dogpile, the javascript does not seem to be working any more. I use the option "activate", but it is not enough. I am the same issue with gmx.com What you I d

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Yes, I remember that thread. And I don't really think this is a valid > answer. If Gnome wants to change decades-old UI paradigms, the proper way to > do that was to add a setting that must be explicitly adjusted in

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

Ahmad Samir writes: From an older thread in this ML, that behaviour can be reverted to the old way by adding this line to ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini: gtk-primary-button-warps-slider=false Yes, I remember that thread. And I don't really think this is a valid answer. If Gnome wants to

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 1 May 2016 at 23:59, Sam Varshavchik <mr...@courier-mta.com> wrote: > Ed Greshko writes: > > On 05/01/16 19:03, Frederic Muller wrote: >> >> > Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to >> > have vertical scroll bars on mo

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/02/2016 09:17 AM, Doug wrote: > > On 05/01/2016 08:07 AM, Frederic Muller wrote: >> On 05/01/2016 08:00 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: >>> On 2016-05-01 at 18:03:02 Frederic Muller wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Firefox just go

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/2016 08:07 AM, Frederic Muller wrote: On 05/01/2016 08:00 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: On 2016-05-01 at 18:03:02 Frederic Muller wrote: Hi! Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few exception

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

Ed Greshko writes: On 05/01/16 19:03, Frederic Muller wrote: > Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to > have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few exception). > Is this a new option and is there a way to set it back to showing those

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

per: 1; -GtkRange-slider-width: 15; -GtkRange-stepper-size: 20; } Scrollbar wide enough to see and arrows to click on to move a small amount instead of having long lists go zooming off the top or bottom when you try to move the thumb. Thanks Tom, this is brilliant. I am on Firefox 49.0a1 and Thunderb

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/2016 08:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/01/16 21:07, Frederic Muller wrote: > >> Sure. I've found more sites with vertical scroll bars after posting the >> message. :-/ One for example would be https://slashdot.org/ > > No problem for me on this site. > > I don't normally use FF, so

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/16 21:07, Frederic Muller wrote: > Sure. I've found more sites with vertical scroll bars after posting the > message. :-/ One for example would be https://slashdot.org/ No problem for me on this site. I don't normally use FF, so I don't have very many extensions installed. Have you

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/16 21:19, Frederic Muller wrote: > On 05/01/2016 08:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 05/01/16 19:03, Frederic Muller wrote: >> >>> Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to >>> have vertical scroll bars on most web

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

Perhaps it is there, but just so thin you don't see it? I found this somewhere a while back and it helps greatly with gtk scrollbars: zooty> cat .config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css .scrollbar { -GtkScrollbar-has-backward-stepper: 1; -GtkScrollbar-has-forward-stepper: 1; -GtkRange-slider-width: 15;

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/2016 08:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/01/16 19:03, Frederic Muller wrote: > >> Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to >> have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few exception). >> Is this a new option and is th

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/16 19:03, Frederic Muller wrote: > Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to > have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few exception). > Is this a new option and is there a way to set it back to showing those > scroll b

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 05/01/2016 08:00 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > On 2016-05-01 at 18:03:02 Frederic Muller wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way >> to have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few >&

Re: no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

On 2016-05-01 at 18:03:02 Frederic Muller wrote: > Hi! > > Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way > to have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few > exception). Is this a new option and is there a way to set it back to > showing

no more vertical scroll bar on Firefox (46)?

Hi! Firefox just got upgraded to version 46 and it seems there is no way to have vertical scroll bars on most websites (I've found a few exception). Is this a new option and is there a way to set it back to showing those scroll bars? Thank you. Fred -- users mailing list users

Re: firefox plugins in fedora 21

On 04/04/16 23:22, François Patte wrote: > I am wondering why firefox is unable to use the plugins (flash, icedtea) > unless I put an symlink in ~/.mozilla/plugins ? > > Everything ok for the install of icedted-web: > > /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so ->

firefox plugins in fedora 21

Bonjour, I am wondering why firefox is unable to use the plugins (flash, icedtea) unless I put an symlink in ~/.mozilla/plugins ? Everything ok for the install of icedted-web: /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so -> /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 and /etc/alternati

Re: running firefox over X tunneling (was Re: export of programs via ssh)

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:19:52AM +0300, Todor Petkov wrote: > I will try from another Linux workstation today. Ah. Try LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 See this thread:

Re: running firefox over X tunneling (was Re: export of programs via ssh)

"localhost:10.0". If you don't then you aren't > forwarding the display and firefox won't work. > > On the remote machine (the one you're using ssh to contact), check the > /etc/ssh/sshd_conf file and verify you have > > X11Forwarding yes > > set in that file.

Re: running firefox over X tunneling (was Re: export of programs via ssh)

On 03/29/2016 08:15 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 05:59:00PM +0300, Todor Petkov wrote: My workstation is Fedora 23, with the latest updates. I have also several virtual machines with Fedora23 and Centos 5/6/7. When I log in Fedora via ssh and try to run firefox from Fedora

running firefox over X tunneling (was Re: export of programs via ssh)

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 05:59:00PM +0300, Todor Petkov wrote: > My workstation is Fedora 23, with the latest updates. > I have also several virtual machines with Fedora23 and Centos 5/6/7. > When I log in Fedora via ssh and try to run firefox from Fedora, there > is no activity, i

Re: FW: Firefox 44 on Fedora 23 won't start

; Web Developer > Error Console or press keys; <alt+t>, , "catch 22", you have to have firefox running to access. ;-) step 1: check your firefox profile. you did not mention what desktop you are using. i am using kde4, you can make adjustments for your dte. to see wher

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >