Re: [Fedora] Re: how to automatically clean /tmp

2016-01-28 Thread Ed Greshko
On 01/28/16 18:46, Walter Cazzola wrote: > I still have to rid off of one of these two tmpfs > > tmpfs 1633640 0 1633640 0% /run/user/989 > tmpfs 1633640 20 1633620 1% /run/user/526 > > I think I have to keep one of them since it is associated to my id (526) > but I can't imagine what the

Re: [Fedora] Re: [Fedora] Re: how to automatically clean /tmp

2016-01-28 Thread Walter Cazzola
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: I still have to rid off of one of these two tmpfs tmpfs 1633640 0 1633640 0% /run/user/989 tmpfs 1633640 20 1633620 1% /run/user/526 I think I have to keep one of them since it is associated to my id (526) but I can't imagine what the other

Re: [Fedora] Re: how to automatically clean /tmp

2016-01-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:46:49AM +0100, Walter Cazzola wrote: > Ok I dropped the idea of using my current /tmp partition for a tmpfs and > followed your suggestion > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > >If you'd like to use tmpfs now, you can "systemctl enable tmp.mount" and >

Re: [Fedora] Re: how to automatically clean /tmp

2016-01-28 Thread Walter Cazzola
Ok I dropped the idea of using my current /tmp partition for a tmpfs and followed your suggestion On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote: If you'd like to use tmpfs now, you can "systemctl enable tmp.mount" and comment out the /tmp item you currently have in fstab. When you reboot, you

Re: [Fedora] Re: how to automatically clean /tmp

2016-01-28 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 01/28/2016 02:46 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote: If you'd like to use tmpfs now, you can "systemctl enable tmp.mount" and comment out the /tmp item you currently have in fstab. unfortunately this didn't work > systemctl enable tmp.mount The unit

Re: [Fedora] Re: [Fedora] Re: how to automatically clean /tmp

2016-01-28 Thread James Hogarth
On 28 January 2016 at 16:19, Walter Cazzola wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > >>> I still have to rid off of one of these two tmpfs > > >>> tmpfs 1633640 0 1633640 0% /run/user/989 >>> tmpfs 1633640 20 1633620 1% /run/user/526 > > >>> I think I have