On 01/28/16 18:46, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> I still have to rid off of one of these two tmpfs
>
> tmpfs 1633640 0 1633640 0% /run/user/989
> tmpfs 1633640 20 1633620 1% /run/user/526
>
> I think I have to keep one of them since it is associated to my id (526)
> but I can't imagine what the
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I still have to rid off of one of these two tmpfs
tmpfs 1633640 0 1633640 0% /run/user/989
tmpfs 1633640 20 1633620 1% /run/user/526
I think I have to keep one of them since it is associated to my id (526)
but I can't imagine what the other
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:46:49AM +0100, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Ok I dropped the idea of using my current /tmp partition for a tmpfs and
> followed your suggestion
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> >If you'd like to use tmpfs now, you can "systemctl enable tmp.mount" and
>
Ok I dropped the idea of using my current /tmp partition for a tmpfs and
followed your suggestion
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote:
If you'd like to use tmpfs now, you can "systemctl enable tmp.mount" and
comment out the /tmp item you currently have in fstab. When you reboot, you
On 01/28/2016 02:46 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote:
If you'd like to use tmpfs now, you can "systemctl enable tmp.mount"
and comment out the /tmp item you currently have in fstab.
unfortunately this didn't work
> systemctl enable tmp.mount
The unit
On 28 January 2016 at 16:19, Walter Cazzola wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
>>> I still have to rid off of one of these two tmpfs
>
>
>>> tmpfs 1633640 0 1633640 0% /run/user/989
>>> tmpfs 1633640 20 1633620 1% /run/user/526
>
>
>>> I think I have