Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/15/2010 12:56 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
[snip]
Would you mind sharing which networks your attacks came from?
I hesitate to answer, but will.
The people who own 67.222.1.124 and 184.106.213.202
were very cooperative and interested.
The Chinese IP address was
On 15 October 2010 02:31, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Try to use www.arin.net
You will see that arin.net will not tell you to which
network (such as APNIC ) it belongs. Very mysterious :)
s...@samlap:~$ whois 218.14.146.200
% [whois.apnic.net node-2]
% Whois data copyright terms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is off topic, but I thought I should tell people.
This past weekend, I suffered a DOS attack launched against VOIP SIP
Clients. The attack came, at different times, from 3 separate IP addresses.
I blocked the IP addresses using IP Tables when
On 10/14/2010 09:29 PM, Rick Sewill wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is off topic, but I thought I should tell people.
This past weekend, I suffered a DOS attack launched against VOIP SIP
Clients. The attack came, at different times, from 3 separate IP addresses.
Rick Sewill rsew...@gmail.com wrote:
This is off topic, but I thought I should tell people.
Can these clients be run on Fedora?
Also this attack may target more than just VOIP SIP clients.
Thank you for the warning.
James McKenzie
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 10/14/2010 10:03 PM, James Mckenzie wrote:
Rick Sewillrsew...@gmail.com wrote:
This is off topic, but I thought I should tell people.
Can these clients be run on Fedora?
Well twinkle is available on F13:
$ yum info twinkle
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Available Packages
Rick Sewill rsew...@gmail.com writes:
This past weekend, I suffered a DOS attack launched against VOIP SIP
Clients. The attack came, at different times, from 3 separate IP addresses.
I'm seeing a vast increase in attemted SIP registers too. Asterisk (f13
more or less stock via yum) seems to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2010 02:58 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/14/2010 09:29 PM, Rick Sewill wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is off topic, but I thought I should tell people.
This past weekend, I suffered a DOS attack launched
On 10/14/2010 03:56 PM, Rick Sewill wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2010 02:58 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/14/2010 09:29 PM, Rick Sewill wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is off topic, but I thought I should tell people.
This
On 10/15/2010 12:56 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
[snip]
Would you mind sharing which networks your attacks came from?
I hesitate to answer, but will.
The people who own 67.222.1.124 and 184.106.213.202
were very cooperative and interested.
The Chinese IP address was 218.14.146.200.
I could
On 10/14/2010 06:21 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/15/2010 12:56 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
[snip]
Would you mind sharing which networks your attacks came from?
I hesitate to answer, but will.
The people who own 67.222.1.124 and 184.106.213.202
were very cooperative and interested.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
