On 01/09/2013 10:26 AM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
Never hurts to look at it.
I understood that quite some steps were taken (now at 0.53)
Some people regards the stuff from Microsoft not even beta-grade ;-)
Same discussion was for reiserfs and currently for btrfs.
By trying out, you can get
On 01/09/2013 09:15 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
I am currently considering some less expensive storage arrays using 4TB
SAS disks in 5+1 RAID 5 configurations (each array would be responsible
for 10 such volumes). This will give me one level of protection. Then
I'm going to propose a DR
Hi,
I'm looking to build a 1PB (usable) volume on a Fedora or
Redhat platform. The volume (has to be a single volume) will be
shared out by NFS. My considerations in the order of importance
are:
Data loss
Cost
Speed
I am currently
considering some less expensive storage arrays using 4TB
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of arag...@dcsnow.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:09 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Building a 1pb volume
Hi,
I'm looking to build a 1PB (usable) volume on a Fedora
On 01/09/2013 05:09 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to build a 1PB (usable) volume on a Fedora or Redhat
platform. The volume (has to be a single volume) will be shared out by
NFS. My considerations in the order of importance are:
at this size i imagine that you need some speed
Hi there,
some thoughts on that:
On 09.01.2013 17:09, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
Data loss
this is a matter of backup strategy, you mean availability here?
Cost
Speed
I am currently considering some less expensive storage arrays using
4TB SAS disks in 5+1 RAID 5 configurations (each array
Hi there,
some thoughts on that:
On
09.01.2013 17:09, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
Data
loss
this is a matter of backup strategy, you mean availability
here?
This is a long term archive and this data will only
reside here.
afaik the biggest SAS disks are 900GB, you
mean NL-SAS? Even
You might want to take a look at ceph:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/
http://ceph.com/ceph-storage/block-storage/
Ceph/Rados appear
to still be in the beta stage. Is that not true? The 0.48
version number doesn't leave me with a lot of confidence.
--
This message has been scanned for
scalable.
Hans
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of arag...@dcsnow.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:08 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: RE: Building a 1pb volume
You might want to take a look at ceph
Never hurts to look at it.
I understood that quite some
steps were taken (now at 0.53)
Some people regards
the stuff from Microsoft not even beta-grade ;-)
Same discussion was for reiserfs and currently for btrfs.
By trying out, you can get confidence, and from the description it
looks
On 01/09/2013 06:04 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
I calculated we would need 3 racks for the arrays, servers and
switches. We have the space in our datacenter so that won't be an issue.
Why 3 racks? in a 42U racks you can have 2 X :
1 X 2U server with 2 X RAID HCA and 1 X 10 Gbit NIC (2 ports)
11 matches
Mail list logo