Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:08:53 +1030, Tim wrote: However, if I look through it for packages with tzdata in their name, I find the following: joda-time-1.6.2-2.tzdata2010l.fc14.noarch.rpm joda-time-javadoc-1.6.2-2.tzdata2010l.fc14.noarch.rpm tzdata-2010k-1.fc14.noarch.rpm

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:39:20 + (UTC), Andre wrote: At present it's not too uncommon for packages to have newer versions in older releases, unfortunately. I think the upcoming AutoQA is supposed to prevent this automatically, but for now it depends on maintainers doing it manually. Which

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-06 Thread Eric Tanguy
Le 06/11/2010 00:13, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : On 11/05/2010 06:27 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote: ** Found 4 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: mlt-python-0.5.10-1.fc13.i686 has missing requires of python(abi) = ('0', '2.6', None) openshot-1.2.2-1.fc13.noarch has missing

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-06 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/06/2010 12:41 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote: I remove their and all is fine now. system-config-display seems to be no longer available ? Yes mlt-python seems to be not using python 2.7 but 2.6 rpmfusion problem ? Correct. Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
I upgraded a Fedora 13 system to Fedora 14 using the full boot from DVD (not preupgrade). The upgrade itself went smoothly. After the reboot into F14 I then attempted to do a yum update (it is all defaults, I don't have any custom yum repositories set up). The update initially failed because of a

Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread J B
Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes: ... So what may be going on here? I have lots of packages from seemingly different releases. But do note that this system started from a fresh install of Fedora 13 ... I never had an earlier version installed. # rpm -qa | grep fc11 | wc -l

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM, J B jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote: Some of the earlier packages (F11, etc) may come from e.g. rpmfusion-* repos, if you have them enabled, that are required by current F14 packages, e.g. vlc. I'm not familiar with the rpmfusion repos, what are they? Start with

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:30 -0400, Deron Meranda wrote: So what may be going on here? I have lots of packages from seemingly different releases. But do note that this system started from a fresh install of Fedora 13 ... I never had an earlier version installed. That is normal. For any

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Deron Meranda deron.mera...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM, J B jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote: Some of the earlier packages (F11, etc) may come from e.g. rpmfusion-* repos, if you have them enabled, that are required by current F14 packages, e.g.

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
You could try package-cleanup --dupes or packages-cleanup --problems to look for problems in the RPM database. What happens if you do yum reinstall tzdata or yum distro-sync tzdata? If the latter works, you could try yum distro-sync to try to get the current version of all packages. -- users

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:45 AM, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote: Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes: ... That dependency makes no sense to me. Why would gnome depend on an Apache module? Try to understand: $ gnome-user-share $ mod_dnssd Perhaps you do not want to have/need

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
JB jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes: ... Try to understand: $ gnome-user-share $ mod_dnssd Perhaps you do not want to have/need gnome-user-share package ? I meant: $ yum info gnome-user-share $ yum info mod_dnssd :-) JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes: ... So, now for a good measure: # yum clean all # yum check-update # yum update JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... What I have installed: * tzdata-2010n-1.fc13.noarch (version 2010n) What is on the Fedora 14 DVD: * tzdata-2010k-1.fc14.noarch (version 2010k) and there don't appear to be any F14 updates for tzdata yet (using yum list available).

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... snip yum distribution-synchronization This will leave you with what is in the F14 repos -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing list

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes: # yum clean all Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit, verify Cleaning repos: fedora updates Cleaning up Everything 0 delta-package files removed, by presto Well, watch your steps :-) Loaded plugins: downloadonly,

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... snip yum distribution-synchronization This will leave you with what is in the F14 repos That looks like it wants to

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On 05/11/10 08:40, Deron Meranda wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... snip yum distribution-synchronization This will leave you with what is in

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: F14 was done without a mass rebuild to rename fc13 to fc14. If you find something breaks because of a newer fc13, you may need to downgrade, otherwise if not broken. Maybe let them play together. I understand now, thanks.

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Frank Murphy frankly3d at gmail.com wrote: On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... snip yum distribution-synchronization This will leave

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On my cleanly installed and updated F14 x86_64 box, the correct versions of the above packages are And I've included what I have afterward in [brackets]... apr-util-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes: apr-util-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64 apr-util-devel-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64 apr-util-ldap-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64 info-4.13a-10.fc14.x86_64 orc-0.4.6-1.fc14.x86_64 orc-0.4.6-1.fc14.i686 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.14-7.fc14.noarch texinfo-4.13a-10.fc14.x86_64

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Deron Meranda deron.meranda at gmail.com writes: I guess ideally didn't happen :) Because I definitely have newer packages installed under Fedora 13 than I would get if syncing to Fedora 14. Is this caused by just luck that the same upstream patches made it though to F13 updates before it

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Tanguy
Le 05/11/2010 08:47, Andre Robatino a écrit : You could try package-cleanup --dupes or packages-cleanup --problems to look for problems in the RPM database. What happens if you do yum reinstall tzdata or yum distro-sync tzdata? If the latter works, you could try yum distro-sync to try to

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/05/2010 06:27 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote: ** Found 4 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: mlt-python-0.5.10-1.fc13.i686 has missing requires of python(abi) = ('0', '2.6', None) openshot-1.2.2-1.fc13.noarch has missing requires of python(abi) = ('0', '2.6', None)