Hopefully this will solve your problems. :)
probably but to be honest, I haven't been tracking
this problem but
generally, you can just nuke the file,
~/.mozilla/firefox/YOUR_SALTED_PROFILE/pluginreg.dat and it
will be
rebuilt on the next Firefox startup.
and more to the
Hi Don,
2010/4/5 Don Vogt dn...@yahoo.com:
Hopefully this will solve your problems. :)
probably but to be honest, I haven't been tracking
this problem but
generally, you can just nuke the file,
~/.mozilla/firefox/YOUR_SALTED_PROFILE/pluginreg.dat and it
will be
rebuilt on the
On Monday 05 April 2010 08:44 AM, David García Granda wrote:
Did you remove nspluginwrapper?
Yes, please try this before we can say we give up. :)
I tried to clean things up a bit using package-cleanup but didn't do much.
I did clean out old kernels and kernel-devel files. That didn't
--
Message: 12
Did you remove nspluginwrapper?
Yes, but firefox still doesn't run
What about removing packages from fc10 and fc11?
goffice04-0.4.3-5.fc11.i586
libdhcp4client-4.0.0-37.fc10.i386
libdvdcss-1.2.10-1.i386
libvolume_id-141-7.fc11.i586
Livna
On Saturday 03 April 2010 10:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Don,
That actually helps a lot. :)
On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
xulrunner, but maybe as last
2010/4/4 Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 03 April 2010 10:28 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Don,
That actually helps a lot. :)
On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
I would like to avoid removing and
Hi Don,
I finally got straight on what you wanted for strace.
I have attached a gzipped copy, but I don't know if it will go through the
list, and I lost track of who wanted it. If it doesen't go through let me
know and I will send it direct.
It makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
Hi Don,
I finally got straight on what you wanted for strace.
I have attached a gzipped copy, but I don't know if it
will go through the list, and I lost track of who wanted it.
If it doesen't go through let me know and I will send it
direct.
It makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
--
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:30:31 +0200
From: David Garc?a Granda dgra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Firefox not running : unable to load XPCOM
(was Re:)
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID
I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
xulrunner, but maybe as last option it would work :-?
Regards,
David
After removing and re-installing xulrunner (which removed and re-installed
firefox again ), I ran firefox from a terminal and got back a little bit more
On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 22:20 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Don,
That actually helps a lot. :)
On Saturday 03 April 2010 09:49 PM, Don Vogt wrote:
I would like to avoid removing and installing again firefox and
xulrunner, but maybe as last option it would work :-?
Regards,
David
Hi Don,
Yesterday I updated to kernel 2.6.32.9.70 fc12 and to
firefox-3.5.9-1.fc12 and now firefox won't start. I get a
notice in the bottom bar for a few seconds and then it goes
blank.
Strange, I have the same package versions and firefox runs
fine...
I tried starting firefox in a
Hi Don,
Please have proper a subject and trim the replies appropriately, I
missed your earlier reply because of a missing subject and it was quite
difficult to pick out your responses.
On Friday 02 April 2010 12:48 AM, David García Granda wrote:
Hi Don,
I tried starting firefox in a
Hi Don,
or advice would be appreciated.
Is it possible for you to check if XPCOM
files related
from VirtualBox
conflict with Firefox/xulrunner ones?.
Maybe something
not compatible
from VirtualBox is loaded instead of the
right one.
The OP should first try
1.
Hello Don,
On Friday 02 April 2010 07:38 AM, David García Granda wrote:
1.- Did you try strace (strace -o strace.log firefox)?. If
not, please
do it and post trace output file (strace.log in the example
mentioned)
for inspection.
2.- Which architecture are you running (i686, x86_64)?. Do
I finally got straight on what you wanted for strace.
I have attached a gzipped copy, but I don't know if it will go through the
list, and I lost track of who wanted it. If it doesen't go through let me know
and I will send it direct.
It makes absolutely no sense to me at all.
16 matches
Mail list logo
