On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/2011 11:45 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I guess I did not see it as complicated. But this was before you
said the message was base 64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/2011 11:45 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I guess I did not see it as complicated. But this was before you
said the message was base 64 encoded. But I would use a sed script
file, not the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/2011 11:33 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
For the mail you have, you could probably use sed to remove the
forwarding boiler plate. Exactly how you will want to do it
depends on if the
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I guess I did not see it as complicated. But this was before you
said the message was base 64 encoded. But I would use a sed script
file, not the command line.
Remove the forwarding header by matching the start/finish as an
address range.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/2011 11:45 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
I guess I did not see it as complicated. But this was before you
said the message was base 64 encoded. But I would use a sed script
file, not the
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
Use the following fetchmail configuration as a template. Replace all
USERNAME with your unix user account name, all PASSWORD with the password
for that IMAP account, all IMAPUSER with the IMAP username, all MAILHOST
with the IMAP serverhostname and
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:28 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I couldn't get it to work with exchange.
I'm told Microsoft is holding up IMAP requests.
I did get it to work with cableone.
The relevant account is a thin wrapper on gmail.
I have the mail I want, sort of.
I had to hit forward
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
Use the following fetchmail configuration as a template. Replace all
USERNAME with your unix user account name, all PASSWORD with the password
for that IMAP account, all IMAPUSER with the IMAP username, all MAILHOST
with the IMAP serverhostname and
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Ed Greshko wrote:
The other thingthe web pages at nodak.edu would seem to suggest that
you have to request IMAP access from the IT department before they
enable it. Is that the case? Have you contacted the IT department
On 06/21/2011 02:01 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Ed Greshko wrote:
The other thingthe web pages at nodak.edu would seem to suggest that
you have to request IMAP access from the IT department before they
enable it. Is that
The problem is Linux vs. Microsoft Exchange 5.5 .
The help desk guy tells me that he will try to get IMAP enabled on my account.
He does not guaranty success.
Is there anything Linux that will talk to Microsoft Exchange 5.5?
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
Pessimist: The glass is
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:04 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
The problem is Linux vs. Microsoft Exchange 5.5 .
The help desk guy tells me that he will try to get IMAP enabled on my account.
He does not guaranty success.
Is there anything Linux that will talk to Microsoft Exchange 5.5?
Given the
On 21 June 2011 22:04, Michael Hennebry henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
The problem is Linux vs. Microsoft Exchange 5.5 .
The help desk guy tells me that he will try to get IMAP enabled on my account.
He does not guaranty success.
Is there anything Linux that will talk to Microsoft
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:04:03 -0500 Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
The problem is Linux vs. Microsoft Exchange 5.5 .
I am not very familiar with version numbers, but I doubt this is some
old system. Most likely, the help desk misspoke or made up some
number
My bet
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:04:03 -0500 Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
The problem is Linux vs. Microsoft Exchange 5.5 .
I am not very familiar with version numbers, but I doubt this is some
old system. Most likely, the help
Tim:
But why? One of the main points of scripting is automation.
Joe Zeff:
Well, you might want it to work that way if other people have access to
your account and you don't want them reading your mail.
If other people have access to your account, then your security is
blown, anyway. Do
Tim:
Who else gets to see *your* .fetchmailrc file? In the normal run of
things, these days, your homespace isn't accessible to other users,
neither are the files in it. If it is, then you've got plenty of other
security concerns to worry about.
Ranjan Maitra:
I guess I worry that there is
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:24:12 -0500 Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
wrote:
Tim:
Who else gets to see *your* .fetchmailrc file? In the normal run of
things, these days, your homespace isn't accessible to other users,
neither are the files in it. If it is, then you've got plenty of other
On 06/20/2011 03:13 AM, Tim wrote:
If other people have access to your account, then your security is
blown, anyway. Do you know how to stop them installing something to log
what you're doing?
I'm referring mostly to the guy's kids. You don't want them reading
your work email, but you might
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
Use the following fetchmail configuration as a template. Replace all
It goes in ~/.fetchmailrc ?
The command is just
fetchmail
?
USERNAME with your unix user account name, all PASSWORD with the
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
Use the following fetchmail configuration as a template. Replace all
USERNAME with your unix user account name, all PASSWORD with the password
for that IMAP account, all IMAPUSER with the IMAP username, all MAILHOST
with the IMAP serverhostname and
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
--- BEGIN CONFIG ---
set postmaster USERNAME
set bouncemail
set no spambounce
set softbounce
set properties
set no showdots
poll MAILHOST with proto IMAP
user 'IMAPUSER' there with password 'PASSWORD' is 'USERNAME' here
options keep
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Here is my ~/.fetchmailrc
set postmaster hennebry
set bouncemail
set no spambounce
set softbounce
set properties
set no showdots
poll imap.ndsu.nodak.edu with proto IMAP
user 'Michael.Hennebry' there is 'hennebry' here
options keep
Two questions: are you sure you have an IMAP account set up? Reading
from here, it appears that the settings may be different:
http://www.ndsu.edu/its/help/index/e_mail/ndsu_outlook/non_supported_e_mail_software_setup/imap/
Also, I assume you want to fetch e-mail first and use a mailer
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Two questions: are you sure you have an IMAP account set up? Reading
from here, it appears that the settings may be different:
http://www.ndsu.edu/its/help/index/e_mail/ndsu_outlook/non_supported_e_mail_software_setup/imap/
I noticed that.
There is
On 06/21/2011 07:19 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
poll imap.ndsu.nodak.edu with proto IMAP
user 'Michael.Hennebry' there is 'hennebry' here
options keep fetchall ssl mda formail -c /home/hennebry/inbox
folder INBOX
#poll imap.ndsu.nodak.edu with proto IMAP
# user
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:57:45 -0500 Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Two questions: are you sure you have an IMAP account set up? Reading
from here, it appears that the settings may be different:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/21/2011 07:19 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
poll imap.ndsu.nodak.edu with proto IMAP
user 'Michael.Hennebry' there is 'hennebry' here
options keep fetchall ssl mda formail -c /home/hennebry/inbox
folder INBOX
#poll imap.ndsu.nodak.edu with
993 is for imaps
995 is for pop3s
Since he specified Account type IMAP it is 993
Missed that, you're correct. So, you should be fine with that, fetchmail
will use 993 for secure imap.
Damian Kohlfeld
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:37:00 -0500 Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 11:14 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
If I omit password 'PASSWORD' it will prompt?
As always, with queries like that, you could try it and find out...
But why? One of the main points of
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
Use the following fetchmail configuration as a template. Replace all
It goes in ~/.fetchmailrc ?
The command is just
fetchmail
?
USERNAME with your unix user account name, all PASSWORD with the password
for that IMAP account, all IMAPUSER with the
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 11:14 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
If I omit password 'PASSWORD' it will prompt?
As always, with queries like that, you could try it and find out...
But why? One of the main points of scripting is automation.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
On 06/19/2011 09:37 AM, Tim wrote:
But why? One of the main points of scripting is automation.
Well, you might want it to work that way if other people have access to
your account and you don't want them reading your mail.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
Tim:
But why? One of the main points of scripting is automation.
Ranjan Maitra:
Yes, but then it gets hardcoded in your .fetchmailrc file in plain
text. Is that desirable?
Who else gets to see *your* .fetchmailrc file? In the normal run of
things, these days, your homespace isn't accessible
Could someone translate the following information into a fetchmail command?
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server: imap.ndsu.nodak.edu
* Incoming mail server encryption: SSL on port 993
* Outgoing mail server: smtp.ndsu.nodak.edu
* Outgoing mail server encryption:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Could someone translate the following information into a fetchmail command?
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server: imap.ndsu.nodak.edu
* Incoming mail server encryption: SSL on port 993
* Outgoing mail server:
PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: How do I point a mail client at Microsoft outlook?
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Could someone translate the following information into a fetchmail
command?
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: How do I point a mail client at Microsoft outlook?
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Could someone translate the following information into a fetchmail
command?
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server
for Fedora users
Subject: Re: How do I point a mail client at Microsoft outlook?
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Could someone translate the following information into a fetchmail
command?
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server: imap.ndsu.nodak.edu
* Incoming
On 06/19/2011 01:02 PM, Damian Kohlfeld wrote:
One more thing, I just noticed you had port 993 for SSL, is that correct, it
usually is 995??
993 is for imaps
995 is for pop3s
Since he specified Account type IMAP it is 993
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Mike Williams wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:11 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas still no go.
Now it asks me for a password, but
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
the data from which I am working is here:
http://www.ndsu.edu/its/help/index/mobile_devices/configuration/
Hi Michael,
I followed your link, and managed to find this page by clicking the
FAQ and Help Doc's
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:27 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
You probably have something set wrong on your end. Double check the
server names, ports, and authentication.
The question is what?
The server names I cut and pasted.
The port numbers are right.
The options for authenticationn
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Jayson Rowe wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
the data from which I am working is here:
http://www.ndsu.edu/its/help/index/mobile_devices/configuration/
Hi Michael,
I followed your link, and managed to find
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Fred Erickson wrote:
My Evolution is 2.32.2 on F14. If you email me direct, I will send you
screen shots of my GMail configuration pages. That may be of some help.
I've got 2.30.3 on F13.
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
On 06/17/2011 08:27 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Is there a reason to expect Thunderbird to do better?
I have mmajor difficulties putting much effort
into something I expect not to work.
I use Thunderbird and found it easy to set up. (Of course, I've lots
more experience with this than you
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:56:12 -0700
Joe Zeff wrote:
It's my current understanding that you can use Thunderbird on
Windows to import a pst file and then import from that into Evolution or,
possibly, Sylpheed.
Or, if you have a dual boot, use Thunderbird under Linux, which is what
I
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:47 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server: imap.ndsu.nodak.edu
* Incoming mail server encryption: SSL on port 993
Then you probably need to specify the incoming mail server as
imap.nsdu.nodak.edu:993 . Also make sure
On 06/15/2011 11:43 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
It's my understanding (possibly out-of-date) that Thunderbird requires (or
required) some libraries that exist only on Windows to import pst files.
There's an add-on that improves your import functionality. I had to
install it to import my mailboxes
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Greg Woods wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:47 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
* Account type: IMAP
* Incoming mail server: imap.ndsu.nodak.edu
* Incoming mail server encryption: SSL on port 993
Then you probably need to specify the incoming mail server as
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:11 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas still no go.
Now it asks me for a password, but it won't take it.
The error box says
Unable to authenticate to IMAP server.
IMAP command failed: Could not connect to server
Did you try the check for supported authentication
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:11 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas still no go.
Now it asks me for a password, but it won't take it.
The error box says
Unable to authenticate to IMAP server.
IMAP command failed: Could not connect to server
Did
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:11 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas still no go.
Now it asks me for a password, but it won't take it.
You probably have
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without success.
That I've never used a mail client before probably doesn't help.
With KMail I'm stuck when I get to
On 06/15/2011 03:16 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
With KMail I'm stuck when I get to
Server Innformation
Incoming server:
Outgoing server:
Use local delivery
There was a time when I could easily have talked you through finding the
information in Outlook, but I happily recycled those neurons
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:58 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without success.
That I've never used a mail client
Michael Hennebry writes:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without success.
That I've never used a mail client before probably doesn't help.
With KMail
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:16 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
With KMail I'm stuck when I get to
Server Innformation
Incoming server:
Outgoing server:
Use local delivery
There was a time when I could easily have talked you through finding the
information in
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:58 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:16 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without success.
That I've never used a mail client before
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 18:39 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Michael Hennebry writes:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without success.
That I've
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:16 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
With KMail I'm stuck when I get to
Server Innformation
Incoming server:
Outgoing server:
Use local delivery
There was a time when I
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:44 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:58 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:44 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:58 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:16 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
For work, I have had to use Microsoft outlook for e-mail.
I'd like to be able to get at it through either
KMail or evolution on my home F13 machine.
I've tried to set up both without success.
That I've never used a mail client before
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 18:24 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
That leaves the blanks I need to fill in.
From migration information given to Mac users,
I gather at least part of one answer is red001.mail.microsoftonline.com .
If so, is that incoming server, outgoing server or something else.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 18:24 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
That leaves the blanks I need to fill in.
From migration information given to Mac users,
I gather at least part of one answer is red001.mail.microsoftonline.com .
If so, is that incoming
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas, I expect not. We are rapidly becoming a Windows-only shop.
I have my doubts they actually know.
I'm pretty sure Microsoft has the actual mail.
Supposing they do know, neither
On 06/15/2011 03:32 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
It's my current understanding that you can use Thunderbird on
Windows to import a pst file and then import from that into Evolution or,
possibly, Sylpheed.
Or, if you have a dual boot, use Thunderbird under Linux, which is what
I use.
--
users
On 06/15/2011 03:39 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas, I expect not. We are rapidly becoming a Windows-only shop.
I have my doubts they actually know.
I'm pretty sure Microsoft has the actual mail.
Supposing they do know, neither evolution nor
KMail is on their list of approved clients.
How
On 06/15/2011 03:44 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Ouch. I'm pretty sure it's POP.
POP (or to be more accurate, POP3) just means that you download the mail
to your client instead of having it live on the server. If you expect
to need any emails you get to be available at work, just be sure to
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:47 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas, I expect not. We are rapidly becoming a Windows-only shop.
I have my doubts they actually know.
I'm pretty sure
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:47 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:39 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Alas, I expect not. We are rapidly
73 matches
Mail list logo
