Well, the high-scoring workstation choices cost too much for me, and/or
did not have a version for Linux. Server choices are not appropriate
for my situation. So I'll stick with rkhunter, chkrootkit, NoScript,
uBlock Origin, Better Privacy, what's built into Firefox and
Thunderbird, and
Good morning,
(replying to a few messages at once)
> Linux has no viruses.
There are actually *two* reasons for starting this thread. First, to get
advice needed to choose the right "anti-virus" for my home workstation.
Second, I believe that the article that I referenced would be of real
On 11 July 2017 at 21:33, William wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> A few years ago, I found a web site "https://www.av-test.org; when trying
> to find comparisons of windows-7 anti-virus software. I more recently
> re-visited that site, and found an article on Linux and
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Doug wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:55:01AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> > > > It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using
> > > > Nmap:
> > > That's
On 07/13/17 08:39, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/12/2017 05:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/13/17 08:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2017 05:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
And if you're running selinux in enforcing mode you'll need to generate a
policy to
allow sshd to bind to the
On 07/12/2017 05:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/13/17 08:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 07/12/2017 05:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> And if you're running selinux in enforcing mode you'll need to generate a
>>> policy to
>>> allow sshd to bind to the chosen port.
>>
>> You don't have to generate a
On 07/13/17 08:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/12/2017 05:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> And if you're running selinux in enforcing mode you'll need to generate a
>> policy to
>> allow sshd to bind to the chosen port.
>
> You don't have to generate a policy, it's really easy. Assuming port 222,
>
On 07/12/2017 05:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I'm not sure what the original poster was meaning by the last part of
that command. You should use either a single host(name) or an IP range,
not both. In your case use either "linux1" or "192.168.1.11", but I'm
not sure how effective it is to scan
On 07/12/2017 05:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
And if you're running selinux in enforcing mode you'll need to generate a
policy to
allow sshd to bind to the chosen port.
You don't have to generate a policy, it's really easy. Assuming port
222, just do:
semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp 222
On 07/12/2017 05:10 PM, Doug wrote:
On 07/12/2017 06:42 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/12/2017 04:39 PM, Doug wrote:
[root@linux1 doug]# nmap -p -sV linux1 1.192.168.1/24
It's the difference between "-p" and "-p-".
Still doing something wrong:
(this PC is static named 192.168.1.11 and is
On 07/12/2017 05:10 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2017 06:42 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 07/12/2017 04:39 PM, Doug wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2017 09:55 AM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using
Nmap:
i.e. nmap -p- -sV
On 07/13/17 06:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/12/2017 03:39 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Doug wrote:
>>> How do you move SSH off port 22? Please supply konsole code.
>> Dunno about konsole code; it's a single-line change in
>> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config", from
>>
On 07/12/2017 06:42 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/12/2017 04:39 PM, Doug wrote:
On 07/12/2017 09:55 AM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using
Nmap:
i.e. nmap -p- -sV
running PCLOS. Command fails:
[doug@linux1 ~]$ su
Password:
On 07/12/2017 04:42 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/12/2017 04:39 PM, Doug wrote:
>> On 07/12/2017 09:55 AM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
>>> It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using
>>> Nmap:
>>>
>>> i.e. nmap -p- -sV
>>>
>> running PCLOS. Command fails:
>>
>>
On 07/12/2017 04:39 PM, Doug wrote:
On 07/12/2017 09:55 AM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
i.e. nmap -p- -sV
running PCLOS. Command fails:
[doug@linux1 ~]$ su
Password:
[root@linux1 doug]# nmap -p -sV linux1
On 07/12/2017 09:55 AM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
Fred,
It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
i.e. nmap -p- -sV
running PCLOS. Command fails:
[doug@linux1 ~]$ su
Password:
[root@linux1 doug]# nmap -p -sV linux1 1.192.168.1/24
Starting Nmap 7.40 (
On 07/12/2017 03:39 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Doug wrote:
>> How do you move SSH off port 22? Please supply konsole code.
>
> Dunno about konsole code; it's a single-line change in
> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config", from
>
> Port 22
>
> to some unused port.
To
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2017 02:10 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:55:01AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
It is not complicated finding
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2017 02:10 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:55:01AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
It is not complicated finding
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Doug wrote:
> How do you move SSH off port 22? Please supply konsole code.
Dunno about konsole code; it's a single-line change in
"/etc/ssh/sshd_config", from
Port 22
to some unused port.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih...@dminet.com
On 07/12/2017 02:10 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:55:01AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
That's true. It's also true that the vast majority
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> > It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
>>
>> That's true. It's also true that the vast majority of scriptkiddies don't
>> do that. Quite seriously, moving SSH off port 22 *will* and
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:55:01AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> > It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
>
> That's true. It's also true that the vast majority of scriptkiddies don't
> do that.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>> It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
>
> That's true. It's also true that the vast majority of scriptkiddies don't
> do that. Quite seriously, moving SSH off port 22 *will* and *does*
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:55:01AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
That's true. It's also true that the vast majority of scriptkiddies don't
do that. Quite seriously, moving SSH off port 22 *will* and *does* drop
the vast
Fred,
It is not complicated finding SSH running on a different port using Nmap:
i.e. nmap -p- -sV
Suggest adding something like Fail2Ban to slow down the password guess
attempts against SSH.
Cheers,
Frank Pikelner
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:49 AM, fred roller
On 11 July 2017 at 21:33, William wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> A few years ago, I found a web site "https://www.av-test.org; when trying
> to find comparisons of windows-7 anti-virus software. I more recently
> re-visited that site, and found an article on Linux and
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> Linux has no viruses. Why would anyone want an anti-virus then?
I would like to point out, in the gentlest of manners, that is absolutely
untrue. In fact, one of the earliest known bits of effective malware, the
Morris worm,
On 12/07/17 14:19, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
Good morning,
Linux has no viruses. Why would anyone want an anti-virus then? It is
possible to install security tools of course, but those come with your
distribution, you don't need to look up for external stuff.
As stated elsewhere, Linux
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> Linux has no viruses. Why would anyone want an anti-virus then? It is
> possible to install security tools of course, but those come with your
> distribution, you don't need to look up for external
On 07/12/17 14:19, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> Linux has no viruses. Why would anyone want an anti-virus then? It is
> possible to
> install security tools of course, but those come with your distribution, you
> don't
> need to look up for external stuff.
>
Some people run Windows along side Linux
Good morning,
Linux has no viruses. Why would anyone want an anti-virus then? It is
possible to install security tools of course, but those come with your
distribution, you don't need to look up for external stuff.
Hope this helps,
Sylvia
On 12 July 2017 at 02:33, William
Good evening,
A few years ago, I found a web site "https://www.av-test.org; when
trying to find comparisons of windows-7 anti-virus software. I more
recently re-visited that site, and found an article on Linux and
anti-virus software for Linux. It's here:
33 matches
Mail list logo