News:
upgrade to fedora 13 and using ext4 filesystem = ~26MB/s
[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles
2010/4/29 Luigi Castro Cardeles luigi.carde...@gmail.com
Hi list,
just to update:
since kernel 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64, the usb speed with that device has
improved to 8~6,5MB/s...
[]'s
Luigi
On 08/03/2010 07:04 PM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
News:
upgrade to fedora 13 and using ext4 filesystem = ~26MB/s
[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles
2010/4/29 Luigi Castro Cardeles luigi.carde...@gmail.com
mailto:luigi.carde...@gmail.com
Hi list,
just to update:
since
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:12 PM, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want even better performance, reiserfs4 was benchmarked to
exceed ALL other
Linux filesystems, including xfs, ext2/3/4
See http://kerneltrap.org/node/6776
How do you get that from your link? The article has nothing to do
On 08/03/2010 09:31 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:12 PM, JDjd1...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want even better performance, reiserfs4 was benchmarked to
exceed ALL other
Linux filesystems, including xfs, ext2/3/4
See http://kerneltrap.org/node/6776
How do you get
Hi list,
just to update:
since kernel 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64, the usb speed with that device has
improved to 8~6,5MB/s...
[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 03:36 -0800, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
It's likely that the disk came with a special driver for Windows,
whereas the Linux version is using a generic driver. I'd guess the
answer
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 10:28 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
2010/3/9 Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it:
Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
2010/3/9 Mikkel mik...@infinity-ltd.com:
slow speed
high speed
full speed
so:
low-speed - uhci
full-speed - ohci
high-speed - ehci
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
[...]
It's likely that the disk came with a special driver for Windows,
whereas the Linux version is using a generic driver. I'd guess the
answer is probably in the Windows driver code, but of course it will be
binary and proprietary so it's of no use to anyone.
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
[...]
It's likely that the disk came with a special driver for Windows,
whereas the Linux version is using a generic driver. I'd guess the
answer is probably in the Windows driver code, but of course it
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Clearly it's of _some_ use to _someone_. It just isn't of use to _you_.
No, it's of no use to anyone using a non-Windows system. Isn't that what
we're talking about on this list?
There are those who install
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
[...]
It's likely that the disk came with a special driver for Windows,
whereas the Linux version is using a generic driver. I'd guess the
answer is probably in the Windows driver
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 19:24 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 18:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
[...]
It's likely that the disk came with a special driver for Windows,
whereas the Linux version is using a generic
2010/3/9 Mikkel mik...@infinity-ltd.com:
On 03/08/2010 08:17 PM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
Hi Mikkel,
cat /var/log/messages
usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd
That is another reason your drive is slow. You are connected at USB
1.1 speeds, instead of USB 2.0 speeds.
Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
2010/3/9 Mikkel mik...@infinity-ltd.com:
slow speed
high speed
full speed
so:
low-speed - uhci
full-speed - ohci
high-speed - ehci
When the USB group created the 2.0 specifications it made
a good effort to confuse good speed (480Mbit/s) with
awful speed
Hi list and Patrick,
the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said but the
problem continue.
If i try the speed:
time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
i get that speed: 972 MB/s
but if i run rsync, the upload transfer rate is very slow ( begins at 4MB/s
and goes
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 12:16 -0300 schrieb Luigi Castro Cardeles:
the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said
but the problem continue.
time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
i get that speed: 972 MB/s
but if i run rsync, the upload transfer rate is very
Hi,
ntfs.
Nothing strange on dmesg or /var/log/messages.
There is something strange:
i set a line on fstab with some options (rw,async) but when i mount (mount
-a), i get this:
type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,blksize=4096)
I found a bug about this:
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:16 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
Hi list and Patrick,
the default max_sectors is 240. I change this to 1024 like you said
but the problem continue.
If i try the speed:
time dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=5
i get that speed: 972 MB/s
2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
[Please don't top-post on this list]
First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?
Hi,
sorry for top post and sorry about the poor english.
It is not a flash
On 03/08/2010 11:53 AM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
[Please don't top-post on this list]
First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
rotating magnetic surface, or is it some kind of Flash drive?
Hi,
sorry
On 03/08/2010 05:53 PM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
well, ntfs filesystem doesn't accept async/sync param... Tom show that
to me (man mount.ntfs-3g).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571508
i will try that Patrick and post the results.
Start to look for another solution :)
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:26 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
On 03/08/2010 11:53 AM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
[Please don't top-post on this list]
First of all, is this device a real hard disk, i.e. a mechanically
rotating magnetic
2010/3/8 Mikkel mik...@infinity-ltd.com:
I know you posted it, but I must have deleted the message. Is the
drive connecting at full speed, or hi speed?
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
--
users mailing list
On 03/08/2010 08:17 PM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
Hi Mikkel,
cat /var/log/messages
usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd
That is another reason your drive is slow. You are connected at USB
1.1 speeds, instead of USB 2.0 speeds.
new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd
On 03/08/2010 06:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:26 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
On 03/08/2010 11:53 AM, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
2010/3/8 Patrick O'Callaghanpocallag...@gmail.com
[Please don't top-post on this list]
First of all, is this
Hi list,
I use fedora 12 on a dell inspiron 1545 laptop.
(2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64).
i have a external usb hd and i can't make it connect like a usb 2.0 device.
this device is ntfs format
I check if the device is using ehci (dmesg after i plug the device)
[r...@localhost ~]# dmesg | grep
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:05 -0300, Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
Hi list,
I use fedora 12 on a dell inspiron 1545 laptop.
(2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64).
i have a external usb hd and i can't make it connect like a usb 2.0
device.
this device is ntfs format
I check if the device is
27 matches
Mail list logo
