passed up an opportunity to bully.
--
*From:* Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
*To:* Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: criminal use of linux
snip
Legal fights with companies
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Roger are...@bigpond.com wrote:
Is it Criminal use of Linux, or more like criminal use of the world's
worst copyright and patent.
My take on this is that as Microsoft owns C++ anything written in C++ like
code falls under copyright.
Er... nobody can take
On 2 August 2012 07:01, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Roger are...@bigpond.com wrote:
Is it Criminal use of Linux, or more like criminal use of the world's
worst copyright and patent.
My take on this is that as Microsoft owns C++ anything
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 08:13:33 AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
licensing of compiled binaries can be interesting depending on your
compiler license
Ian,
could you provide some concrete example of this?
Thanks,
M. Fioretti
--
http://mfioretti.com
--
users mailing list
:* Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
*To:* Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: criminal use of linux
snip
Legal fights with companies sitting on the kind of cash MS has is a
nearly impossible battle to win, unless
, Joe Wulf joe_w...@yahoo.com wrote:
Correct... Micro$loth has never passed up an opportunity to bully.
From: Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: criminal use of
linux
snip
Legal
On 2 August 2012 11:36, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 08:13:33 AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
licensing of compiled binaries can be interesting depending on your
compiler license
Ian,
could you provide some concrete example of this?
This is the from the Visual
to bully.
--
*From:* Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
*To:* Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: criminal use of linux
snip
Legal fights with companies sitting on the kind of cash MS
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 12:27:25 PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
On 2 August 2012 11:36, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 08:13:33 AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
licensing of compiled binaries can be interesting depending on your
compiler license
Ian,
could you
.
*From:* Digimer li...@alteeve.ca mailto:li...@alteeve.ca
*To:* Community support for Fedora users
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: criminal use of linux
On 08/01/2012 12:02 AM, Skunk Worx wrote:
Uh oh...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/25/microsoft_patent_deal_amdocs/
Microsoft has claimed since 2007 that more than 235 of its patents
are violated by the open source operating system Linux, while critics
claim Redmond has a cynical eye
Typical M$ thinking, and within recent history, SCO!!
Litigation, a sure death trap...
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Skunk Worx skunkw...@verizon.net wrote:
Uh oh...
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jack Craig jack.craig.ap...@gmail.comwrote:
Typical M$ thinking, and within recent history, SCO!!
Thing did not go very well for SCO in the end.
Why is this not being brought into a courtroom, rather than companies just
paying
Microsoft put a lot of money into that legal fight. SCO lost, so
apparently they decided to take another kick at the can, but more
directly this time.
They're using classic FUD to scare people into paying royalties on
software when there is no legal precedent backing MS' claims. They
simply
-Original message-
From: Christopher Svanefalk christopher.svanef...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed 01-08-2012 10:48
Subject:Re: criminal use of linux
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org;
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:49:01 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Why is this not being brought into a courtroom, rather than companies just
paying licenses?
Cost.
License Fee: $1
Legal cost to fight it in court: $2
Chance of winning in court: 100% (Note: 99.% is still 100%)
What
On 08/01/2012 01:10 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:49:01 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Why is this not being brought into a courtroom, rather than companies just
paying licenses?
Cost.
License Fee: $1
Legal cost to fight it in court: $2
Chance of winning in court: 100%
Correct... Micro$loth has never passed up an opportunity to bully.
From: Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: criminal use of linux
snip
Legal
Is it Criminal use of Linux, or more like criminal use of the world's
worst copyright and patent.
My take on this is that as Microsoft owns C++ anything written in C++
like code falls under copyright. I'm probably way of centre here but it
certainly seems that way.
Maybe this needs to be
, August 1, 2012 12:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: criminal use of linux
snip
Legal fights with companies sitting on the kind of cash MS has is a
nearly impossible battle to win, unless you can match them. So this has
nothing to do with facts and more to do with bullying.
Digimer
--
users mailing
AKA Extortion, Racketeering.
On 1/08/2012, at 4:02 PM, Skunk Worx skunkw...@verizon.net wrote:
Uh oh...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/25/microsoft_patent_deal_amdocs/
Microsoft has claimed since 2007 that more than 235 of its patents are
violated by the open source operating
21 matches
Mail list logo
