Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 01/06/10 23:24, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: --snip-- I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who *is* responsible for this? you filed the bug they will get it. But there might be nothing they can do

RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or missing release IDs. For example: evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64 which is in fact intended for evolution-2.28, and not for evolution-2.30, which is included in FC13. (And so it doesn't work) There are

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or missing release IDs. For example: evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64 which is in fact intended for evolution-2.28, and not for evolution-2.30,

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Frank Murphy
On 01/06/10 21:05, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: --snip-- Is this harmful? Should it be reported to the Fedora Bugzilla? Thanks - jon Perfectly fine, as there was no mass rebuild for F13. Nothing to panic about. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:24 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or missing release IDs. For example: evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64 which is in fact

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who*is* responsible for this? Package maintenance (read the RPM itself) is the distribution's responsibility (read Fedora). Software

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 15:24 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:24 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or missing release IDs. For example:

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 17:31 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who*is* responsible for this? Package maintenance (read the RPM

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 06/01/2010 06:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Once again: this package is not part of the standard Gnome plugin set for Evolution. It's a third-party add-on. In fact it installs in the wrong place in F13, under /usr/lib64/evolution/2.28/plugins instead of

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 15:24 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:24 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or missing release IDs. For example:

Re: RPMs in FC13 with wrong or missing release

2010-06-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 19:55 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: No need to pull out the elitest card. Elitist? Moi? poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: