On 06/23/2010 06:27 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
there are multiple ways to install nvidias drivers. Its really not simple
to
cover them all. some ways like using the installer directly from nvidia
replace a bunch of Xorg
At 23:58 on 23 Jun 2010, Steve Searle wrote:
Around 11:50pm on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 (UK time), Marcel Rieux
scrawled:
Once again, and this is bound to be the last answer I give. (Michael
And then 3 minutes later
Around 11:53pm on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 (UK time), Marcel Rieux
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 05:34:05 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
As a simple user, I'm not in a position to fight RPMFusion. So, if the
Nouveau developers don't want to provide instructions on how to install
Nouveau when
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
there are multiple ways to install nvidias drivers. Its really not simple
to
cover them all. some ways like using the installer directly from nvidia
replace a bunch of Xorg bits
It's most likely that people who have
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
I'm not attacking you, I'm stating a very plain fact. If RPMfusion says
Sure, we'll help you move from Nouveau to NIVDIA and, when people want to
come back to Nouveau, Nouveau developers answer Ah, you fucked up your
system? Good luck! the
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:39:16 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
reverse whatever it was you did to enable the nvidia driver, then you
get
Nouveau
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
One way is to back up your data and reinstall Fedora. That's simple to
explain and reliable. It's an annoying amount of work, but it might have
taken less of your time as things turned out.
Reinstalling to install a
Around 11:50pm on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 (UK time), Marcel Rieux scrawled:
Once again, and this is bound to be the last answer I give. (Michael
And then 3 minutes later
Around 11:53pm on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 (UK time), Marcel Rieux scrawled:
Reinstalling to install a driver? Are you
On 06/23/2010 05:53 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Reinstalling to install a driver? Are you serious! That's worst than
being back to the Windows days!
Do you get the feeling that people have stopped taking you seriously?
--
Registered Linux User #16148 (http://counter.li.org/)
signature.asc
On Jun 24, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
One way is to back up your data and reinstall Fedora. That's simple to
explain and reliable. It's an annoying amount of work, but it might
have
taken less of your
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 23:30:24 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 15:17:14 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a
On Monday, June 21, 2010 10:30:24 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 15:17:14 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a corresponding
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
That makes no sense. If you ask them for information about why this
particular kmod package was delayed, I doubt that they would give you
an answer anything like you suggest.
Oops, sorry! I read too fast and thought,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll check.
The question has been asked here on the 17th:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/2010-June/000682.html
There's one reply to the message, it's somebody explaining Fedora 12 has the
same
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 15:55:32 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
And RPMfusion provides instructions on how to get Nouveau out of the way to
do a clean install. Why, as I was explaining to Dennis Gilmore, shouldn't
the Nouveau developers provide instructions to do the
On 06/22/2010 12:47 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
mailto:den...@ausil.us wrote:
We have developers working really hard to make things just work in a
completely free and open way. they are fight a tough battle that
is part
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 15:55:32 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
And RPMfusion provides instructions on how to get Nouveau out of the way
to
do a clean install. Why, as I was explaining to Dennis
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 02:47:24 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
We have developers working really hard to make things just work in a
completely free and open way. they are fight a tough battle that is part
of
what defines
Marcel Rieux wrote:
[snip]
Once again, I wonder why Fedora is doing so poorly on the desktop...
Please stop posting in this off-topic thread. I've tried to ignore it
and send you off-list emails but 1) you seem to be ignoring my emails
and 2) this thread is now over 70 posts long.
--
users
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 18:34:05 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
As a simple user, I'm not in a position to fight RPMFusion. So, if the
Nouveau developers don't want to provide instructions on how to install
Nouveau when NVIDIA is installed, people like Dennis Gilmore will
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
reverse whatever it was you did to enable the nvidia driver, then you get
Nouveau since its the default.
How do you, for instance, reverse:
su -
mv /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r)-nouveau.img
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 05:34:05 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
As a simple user, I'm not in a position to fight RPMFusion. So, if the
Nouveau developers don't want to provide instructions on how to install
Nouveau when NVIDIA is installed, people like Dennis Gilmore will find the
hard way what
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 23:39:16 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
The day you provide instructions on a page belonging to Fedora/Nouveau
on how to install Nouveau the same way RPMFusion does for the NVIDIA module,
I'll give some thought to Nouveau. For now, I must say that I'm
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:39:16 -0400
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you, for instance, reverse:
su -
mv /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img /boot/initramfs-$(uname
-r)-nouveau.img dracut /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img $(uname -r)
YOU probably know. I don't. Many Fedora users
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 16:25:38 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing that would be nice is an howto on disinstalling nvidia
drivers
made available on Fedora's or rpmfusion's site. Last time
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 15:17:14 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a corresponding nvidia
kernel module was provided. Not a word anywhere as to why the module wasn't
provided with the kernel as usual.
Did you ask on the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 15:17:14 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snip) So, finally, 4 days after the kernel update, a corresponding
nvidia
kernel module was provided. Not a word anywhere as to why the
Marcel Rieux wrote:
Did you ask on the RPMFusion lists?
No, but I have a pretty good idea of what I'd be told there. They'd
say that their business is to teach how to install kmod-nvidia
correctly and that if I want to install Nouveau, I should ask
Fedora. Wouldn't it make sense?
The Magic
On 06/18/2010 09:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 21:22:59 -0700,
Suvayu Alifatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruno,
On Friday 18 June 2010 09:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
You can also set your system so that the default boot kernel doesn't change
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a repository not supported by Red
Hat/Fedora, could block a kernel update.
They can using
On 06/19/2010 02:02 PM, Marcel Rieux was caught red-handed while writing::
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
mailto:br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com mailto:m.z.ri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 17:02:58 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:10:47 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote to a certain Dan at rpmfusion, but I dougt I'll get an answer. I'm
sure rpmfusion is fully aware that they don't offer teh nvidia module for
the present kernel. and I would make a bet that people at
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
If you think that getting an updated
kernel installed without the corresponding nVidia kmod being installed is
a problem, you could suggest that they use conflicts to block those
updates.
As I said, I don't believe
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 22:02:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, I don't believe rpmfusion, a repository not supported by Red
Hat/Fedora, could block a kernel update.
They can using 'conflicts' in the spec file. If the kmod is installed first,
this can block
Hi Bruno,
On Friday 18 June 2010 09:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
You can also set your system so that the default boot kernel doesn't change
when there is a kernel update. This protects you from the kmod being released
late problem at the cost of having to manually switch boot kernels after
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 21:22:59 -0700,
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruno,
On Friday 18 June 2010 09:16 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
You can also set your system so that the default boot kernel doesn't change
when there is a kernel update. This protects you from the
On Friday 18 June 2010 09:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't know if there is a GUI way to do the following, but you can do it
with an editor.
To change whether or not the new kernel is the default for the next boot
after an install edit /etc/sysconfig/kernel and change
UPDATEDEFAULT=yes
On 06/16/2010 07:51 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:27 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net
wrote:
This has nothing to do with who broke what. This has
everything to
On 06/16/2010 08:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion has a nice working
module for
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion has a
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
the way it works is that rpmfusion cannot build their kmod's until
Fedora ships a new kernel. So there is a lag of time between the kernel
update and the packages from rpmfusion
No. Usually, the kernel and the module
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not expecting because
the one in testing -- posted yesterday -- is an earlier kernel? This
seems to me like an important post and everybody ignores it.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net
wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 18:22:21 -0500,
Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
approved and included packages) and there should be an effort made to
make sure that the tool is smart enough to handle the dependencies
system-wide. If not, then take Apples approach and close the door on
The
On 06/15/2010 10:24 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net
wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On 06/16/2010 01:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 10:24 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martinkevi...@ameritech.net
wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On
On 06/17/2010 02:03 AM, JD wrote:
Seems to me this is a moot point.
Each distro, and in fact each repo, builds it's packages which end up in
some or many cases with different required dependencies from same
package built on some other repo or distro - depending on what was
installed on
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
This has nothing to do with who broke what. This has everything to do
with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux variants, mainstream
enough for the common person to use.
Have you seen Taxi Driver? There's a
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not expecting
because
the one in testing -- posted yesterday -- is an
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:52 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
How can rpmfusion provide the module
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:27 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net
wrote:
This has nothing to do with who broke what. This has
everything to do
with attempting to make Fedora, and
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion has a nice working
module for kernel 2.6.32.10-92.fc12. Since Fedora decided instead
On Monday, 14 June, 2010 @ 23:13 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
[snip]
kernel x86_64 2.6.32.14-127.fc12
Most of the other replies have focused on RPMFusion... but
what's funny to me is the version that went into
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 13:20:28 -0500,
Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
snip
Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that a new
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Darr d...@core.com wrote:
On Monday, 14 June, 2010 @ 23:13 zulu, Marcel Rieux scribed:
Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
[snip]
kernel x86_64 2.6.32.14-127.fc12
Most of the other replies have focused on
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.comwrote:
the way it works is that rpmfusion cannot build their kmod's until
Fedora ships a new kernel. So there is a lag of time between the kernel
update and the packages from rpmfusion because they need the kernel
source to
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
snip
Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that a new
kernel update is *not* offered if the corresponding kmod package that
uses it is
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 16:25:38 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing that would be nice is an howto on disinstalling nvidia drivers
made available on Fedora's or rpmfusion's site. Last time I looked there
were none, if I remember well.
This page has some of what
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 13:20:28 -0500,
Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
snip
Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
On 6/15/2010 4:25 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net
mailto:kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
snip
Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the
interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was:
yum check-update
Then if there was a kernel but no kmod update listed
On 06/14/2010 05:13 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Here's the last update suggestion I received today:
==
PackageArch
Version
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fedora provides you, free of charge, a perfectly good, working,
operating system. And they maintain that system. As provided.
You modified it by adding a package, or packages, from a non Fedora
site(s). Fedora provided
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was:
On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was:
yum check-update
On 6/15/2010 7:18 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles dgbo...@gmail.com
mailto:dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 18:22 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I used to use
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the oldest kernel and it will
still be possible to boot with the present kernel. .. but not with the new
kernel because the new kmod-nvidia is not installed. Which
On 06/14/2010 06:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
For this issue you are really complaining to the wrong people. kmod-nvidia
is from their repository. If lack of an updated kmod-nvidia update needs
to block a
On 06/15/2010 04:43 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
=
So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the oldest kernel and it
will still be possible to boot with the present kernel. .. but not
with the new kernel because the new kmod-nvidia is not
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 18:32 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
On 06/14/2010 06:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
For this issue you are really complaining to the wrong people.
kmod-nvidia
is from their
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Dale J. Chatham d...@chatham.org wrote:
On 06/14/2010 06:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
For this issue you are really complaining to the wrong people.
kmod-nvidia
is from
Marcel Rieux wrote:
Some might argue that those who might be blamed by the unenlightened
should do something to keep people from crashing their new systems and
not knowing why or how to work around it.
While you are correct in what you say, at the end of the day, really
Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Dale J. Chatham d...@chatham.org
wrote:
[...]
While you are correct in what you say, at the end of the day,
really doesn't matter. Gonna have a lot of people angry and
blaming Fedora.
Exactly. It's no use trying to find culprits: it must
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:43 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
=
So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the oldest kernel and it
will still be possible to boot with the present
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 23:03 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:13:59 -0400,
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
So, the oldest kmod-nvidia is removed with the
77 matches
Mail list logo
