Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
improve the transfer speed.
Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
the network is fast (gigabit); you
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
improve the transfer speed.
Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
the network is fast (gigabit); you just spend CPU time.
john wendel wrote:
Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
improve the transfer speed.
Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
the network is fast (gigabit); you just spend CPU time.
Then there is encryption. That can't be turned
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Looks like I'll spend a little time poking at F13 scp and see if I can
improve the transfer speed.
Maybe you are using compression? Compression is a disadvantage when
the network is fast (gigabit); you just spend CPU time.
Then there is
There actually is a patch to provide encryption none to improve speed and
reduce CPU for trusted connections.
That would be cool, but you can avoid this by rsyncing over an alternative
transport, like rsh to a remote rsync daemon which you can instantiate off
the cmd line trivially...
jlc
--
john wendel wrote:
I've got a couple of boxes connected with wire and a gigabit ethernet
switch. With F11 on the sending and receiving sides, I see a transfer
speed of ~ 40 MB/s transfering large files. With F13 on the sending box
(same box, just new software), I get a transfer speed of ~
On 08/21/2010 12:52 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
john wendel wrote:
I've got a couple of boxes connected with wire and a gigabit ethernet
switch. With F11 on the sending and receiving sides, I see a transfer
speed of ~ 40 MB/s transfering large files. With F13 on the sending box
(same box, just
john wendel jwende...@comcast.net writes:
I've got a couple of boxes connected with wire and a gigabit ethernet
switch. With F11 on the sending and receiving sides, I see a transfer
speed of ~ 40 MB/s transfering large files. With F13 on the sending box
(same box, just new software), I
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 03/30/2010 12:06 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
Since two or three days, my network connection seems to have become
much slower. Loading websites with Firefox now takes a mutliple of the
time,
On 03/31/2010 09:07 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Rick Stevensri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 03/30/2010 12:06 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
Since two or three days, my network connection seems to have become
much slower. Loading
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 03/31/2010 09:07 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Rick Stevensri...@nerd.com wrote:
On 03/30/2010 12:06 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
Since two
you might look at wireshark. its a very powerful tool.
as a beginning, you can do a trace on your lan and then use the exert
mode to zero in on big issues...
just a wag, ...
On 03/30/2010 12:06 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
Since two or three days, my network connection
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:06 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Since two or three days, my network connection seems to have become
much slower. Loading websites with Firefox now takes a mutliple of the
time, and I am having sporadic no mirrors found errors with yum. I
am running F12 on a Dell
On 03/30/2010 12:06 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello,
Since two or three days, my network connection seems to have become
much slower. Loading websites with Firefox now takes a mutliple of the
time, and I am having sporadic no mirrors found errors with yum. I
am running F12 on a
14 matches
Mail list logo
