able, so sudo is needed:
/usr/bin
/usr/share/gems
/usr/share/gems/build_info
/usr/share/gems/cache
/usr/share/gems/doc
/usr/share/gems/extensions
/usr/share/gems/gems
/usr/share/gems/specifications
Using addressable 2.6.0
Using bundler 2.0.2
Using colorator 1.1.0
Using concurrent-ruby 1
Allegedly, on or about 05 March 2014, Roger sent:
and Uber security protocol is world class which is why they are so
strict about the original problem of not allowing Web frameworks and
other stuff
Which doesn't quite gel with them allowing an old version of Ruby, but
not allowing a newer
Allegedly, on or about 05 March 2014, Roger sent:
They have the domain and are using it with the current ISP.
When you own a domain, you can point it to anywhere. You don't *have*
to use it with any particular ISP. Your domain records can point your
website address, your email servers, and any
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Roger wrote:
Thanks billo. They are on UberGlobal shared server virtual machine, don't
know how many static IP addresses, stacks of email addresses heaps of
database allowance and plenty of disk space for $300 a year and get the
greatest 24 hr email and phone support
On 03/06/2014 02:33 AM, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Roger wrote:
Thanks billo. They are on UberGlobal shared server virtual machine,
don't know how many static IP addresses, stacks of email addresses
heaps of database allowance and plenty of disk space for $300 a year
and get the
of Ruby, but
not allowing a newer version.
Absolutely agree, and have questioned why the allow use of known risk
insecure software.
Answer: Because some clients use it.
They provide CentOS 6.n or windows server. I thought CentOS auto
installed the latest Ruby, it did on my machine! Go figure!
I
On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent:
Changing ISP is not an option.
You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise
against it. When you have an independent service, you can have your own
domain, and without the
On 03/04/2014 10:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent:
Changing ISP is not an option.
You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise
against it. When you have an independent service, you can have
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Roger wrote:
On 03/04/2014 10:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent:
Changing ISP is not an option.
You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise
against it. When you
On 03/04/2014 05:30 PM, Roger wrote:
How does one have an independent service? Where can I get comprehensive
info on this or even running without an ISP.
How do I server a CMS web site from another ISP while using the current
one that they will not change from?
On 03/05/2014 12:45 PM, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Roger wrote:
On 03/04/2014 10:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 03/04/14 01:58, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent:
Changing ISP is not an option.
You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact,
The ISP will not permit any web frameworks at all and will not install
Rails, or Laravel for php. Will not install Ruby 1.9.3 or Ruby 2.n so am
forced to Ruby 1.8.7.
Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails
without having Rails on the server?, or one generated
On 03/04/2014 11:06 AM, Roger wrote:
The ISP will not permit any web frameworks at all and will not install
Rails, or Laravel for php. Will not install Ruby 1.9.3 or Ruby 2.n so
am forced to Ruby 1.8.7.
Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails
without having Rails
On 03/03/2014 06:06 PM, Roger wrote:
The ISP will not permit any web frameworks at all and will not install
Rails, or Laravel for php. Will not install Ruby 1.9.3 or Ruby 2.n so am
forced to Ruby 1.8.7.
Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails
without having Rails
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent:
Changing ISP is not an option.
You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise
against it. When you have an independent service, you can have your own
domain, and without the extortionate charges that some ISPs demand for
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:06:20 +1100
Roger are...@bigpond.com wrote:
Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails
without having Rails on the server?, or one generated in Laravel for
PHP without Laravel installed. If so how?
Don't know how relevant:
http
On 14/10/12 03:38, Roger wrote:
Using fully updated ruby and Rails on Fedora 16. Trying to learn rails.
I have
Is there a Rails forum or group in Melbourne or Australia to whom I can
ask questions.
I had a look at github but it is very confuzzling, looks like it's for
highly skilled devs. I
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 19:53 -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
I'm testing out some Ruby packages on F17 and I'm finding that all the
gems installed via rubygems are being installed to /usr/local,
instead of /usr, as it was under F16. Any idea where I might find this
configuration knob, and any
I'm testing out some Ruby packages on F17 and I'm finding that all the
gems installed via rubygems are being installed to /usr/local,
instead of /usr, as it was under F16. Any idea where I might find this
configuration knob, and any ideas as to why it changed?
- Julian
--
users mailing list
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:06 +1100, Roger wrote:
I installed ruby, rails, gem, rvm in ubuntu 11.10 and tried to update
Perhaps you should ask on a Ubuntu list. This list is for Fedora.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
I installed ruby, rails, gem, rvm in ubuntu 11.10 and tried to update
ruby from 1.8.7 to the recommended 1.9.2 and it fails.
No matter what I do rails reports /usr/bin/ruby1.8: bad interpreter:
ls -l /usr/bin/ruby*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2011-11-24 14:02 /usr/bin/ruby -
/etc/alternatives
I installed ruby, rails, gem, rvm in ubuntu 11.10 and tried to update
ruby from 1.8.7 to the recommended 1.9.2 and it fails.
No matter what I do rails reports /usr/bin/ruby1.8: bad interpreter:
ls -l /usr/bin/ruby*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2011-11-24 14:02 /usr/bin/ruby -
/etc/alternatives
In Fedora 15, whenever trying to run Ruby gem I am getting an error
message, apparently caused by the rubygem-yard package.
$ gem -v
Error loading RubyGems plugin
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/yard-0.5.3/lib/rubygems_plugin.rb:
undefined method `overwrite_accessor' for Gem::Specification:Class
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Deron Meranda deron.mera...@gmail.com wrote:
In Fedora 15, whenever trying to run Ruby gem I am getting an error
message, apparently caused by the rubygem-yard package.
...
rubygems-1.7.2-2.fc15.noarch
rubygem-yard-0.5.3-3.fc14.noarch
Update Apparently
Deron Meranda wrote, at 07/12/2011 05:32 AM +9:00:
In Fedora 15, whenever trying to run Ruby gem I am getting an error
message, apparently caused by the rubygem-yard package.
$ gem -v
Error loading RubyGems plugin
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/yard-0.5.3/lib/rubygems_plugin.rb:
undefined
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:48 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
mtas...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Please file a bug against rubygem-yard, thank you.
Done. Bug 720520.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720520
Deron
--
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
--
users mailing list
2011/6/22 Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:04 PM, admin lewis adminle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need of ruby 1.9 while f15 has only ruby 1.8.. is there any repo
where I can do the upgrade ?
thanks for any helpfull hint..
lewis
Many of my friends doing Ruby
Hi,
I need of ruby 1.9 while f15 has only ruby 1.8.. is there any repo
where I can do the upgrade ?
thanks for any helpfull hint..
lewis
--
my blog - http://predellino.blogspot.com/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
On 05/19/2011 04:37 AM, Stanley Finch wrote:
I have downloaded a Ruby script file that has line numbers in it,
and it
does not Run like that.
You may also try the following:
perl -pi -e 's/^\s*\d+//' your_script.rb
-Stan
I did ,but what was it suppose to do ?
--
users mailing
On 05/18/2011 07:40 PM, Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus wrote:
Well, the script isn't too long so you can open it easily with
gedit, kate or your favorite editor and remove the repeated number
of line and that's all. You don't need to complicate your life.
Good Luck:
Aradnix
You like
the spaces after the number until it hits a non-space
character. That would probably mess up any indentation in the script.
Mikkel
Well !! If I knew anything about Ruby, I wouldn't have done it the hard
way.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
character. That would probably mess up any indentation in the script.
Mikkel
Well !! If I knew anything about Ruby, I wouldn't have done it the hard
way.
Maybe one of these days I will have to learn something about Ruby. I
just know a little bit about changing the format of a file. You may
want
the spaces after the number until it hits a non-space
character. That would probably mess up any indentation in the script.
Mikkel
Well !! If I knew anything about Ruby, I wouldn't have done it the hard
way.
Maybe one of these days I will have to learn something about Ruby. I
just know a little
I have downloaded a Ruby script file that has line numbers in it, and it
does not Run like that.
Are the line numbers supposed to be removed before running ?
the start of the script; This is just the first 25 lines of the script.
1 1 #!/usr/bin/ruby -w
2
3 # Try to find
On 2011/5/19 7:06, james tate wrote:
I have downloaded a Ruby script file that has line numbers in it, and it
does not Run like that.
Are the line numbers supposed to be removed before running ?
You should remove them.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Well, the script isn't too long so you can open it easily with gedit, kate
or your favorite editor and remove the repeated number of line and that's
all. You don't need to complicate your life.
Good Luck:
Aradnix
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
All:
I have a question concerning how to download a workable version of Ruby.
When I YUM INSTALL RUBY i get ruby 1.8.6 which is great no issue but I want
to do some Rails development work and
the Rails requirement is 1.8.7 or 1.9.2 so how do i point YUM to the correct
Ruby.
Thanks in advance
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Scott Ford
scott.f...@identityforge.comwrote:
All:
I have a question concerning how to download a workable version of Ruby.
When I YUM INSTALL RUBY i get ruby 1.8.6 which is great no issue but I want
to do some Rails development work and
the Rails
I tried: 'yum install ruby-devel' and received this:
ruby-devel.x86-64 0:1.8.6.399-6.fc13
So i assume its 1.8.6 am i correct if so , 1.8.7 must be hiding out
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
[mobile] 609-346-0399
[direct] 678-266-3399 x304
identityforge.com http://identityforge.com
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Scott Ford
scott.f...@identityforge.comwrote:
I tried: 'yum install ruby-devel' and received this:
ruby-devel.x86-64 0:1.8.6.399-6.fc13
So i assume its 1.8.6 am i correct if so , 1.8.7 must be hiding out
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
*[mobile
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Scott Ford
scott.f...@identityforge.comwrote:
All:
I have a question concerning how to download a workable version of Ruby.
When I YUM INSTALL RUBY i get ruby 1.8.6 which is great no issue but I want
to do some Rails development work and
the Rails
41 matches
Mail list logo
