Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-17 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2019-11-17 at 20:36 +0100, Andras Simon wrote: > 2019-11-17 20:02 GMT+01:00, sixpack13 : > > > Anyway, if the OP used a thread-aware client, he wouldn't have been > > > overwhelmed by 300 messages a day. > > > > like TB ? > > I'm not using TB, but I guess so. > > > I wonder why would a

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-17 Thread Andras Simon
2019-11-17 20:02 GMT+01:00, sixpack13 : >> >> Anyway, if the OP used a thread-aware client, he wouldn't have been >> overwhelmed by 300 messages a day. > > like TB ? I'm not using TB, but I guess so. > I wonder why would a thread-aware client reduce the numbers of messages. > If I'm subscribed

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-17 Thread sixpack13
> > Anyway, if the OP used a thread-aware client, he wouldn't have been > overwhelmed by 300 messages a day. like TB ? I wonder why would a thread-aware client reduce the numbers of messages. If I'm subscribed to a list I get them all, don't I ? do I have a lack of knowledge here ? Anyway: it

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 17:23 +0100, Andras Simon wrote: > 2019-11-16 14:29 GMT+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan : > > On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, Andras Simon wrote: > > > 2019-11-16 12:54 GMT+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan : > [...] > > > > > did that years ago and getting a head full of steam. > > >

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-16 Thread Andras Simon
2019-11-16 14:29 GMT+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan : > On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, Andras Simon wrote: >> 2019-11-16 12:54 GMT+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan : [...] >> > > did that years ago and getting a head full of steam. >> > > - Okay, it was the time where daily ~300 and more messages run

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, Andras Simon wrote: > 2019-11-16 12:54 GMT+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan : > > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 23:54 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > > > I would encourage you do that. Any half-decent MUA will do. I use > > > > Evolution, others people use Thunderbird, Claws,

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-16 Thread Andras Simon
2019-11-16 12:54 GMT+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan : > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 23:54 +, sixpack13 wrote: >> > I would encourage you do that. Any half-decent MUA will do. I use >> > Evolution, others people use Thunderbird, Claws, Mutt etc. It doesn't >> > greatly matter. >> > >> >> did that years

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 23:54 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > I would encourage you do that. Any half-decent MUA will do. I use > > Evolution, others people use Thunderbird, Claws, Mutt etc. It doesn't > > greatly matter. > > > > did that years ago and getting a head full of steam. > - Okay, it was

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-15 Thread sixpack13
> On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 19:48 +, sixpack13 wrote: ... > I was much less annoyed by the > old archive format, which was easier to search and had the advantage of > *not* letting you post directly. > I full agree. > > I would encourage you do that. Any half-decent MUA will do. I

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-15 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 19:48 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 23:31 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > > > Knew what? If you don't quote what you're talking about, don't expect > > people to understand you. Most of us don't use HyperKitty and not many > > will be bothered checking

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-15 Thread sixpack13
> On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 23:31 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > Knew what? If you don't quote what you're talking about, don't expect > people to understand you. Most of us don't use HyperKitty and not many > will be bothered checking the archives for the previous message. > > > > WHY does HK not

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-15 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 23:31 +, sixpack13 wrote: > thanks, knew it. Knew what? If you don't quote what you're talking about, don't expect people to understand you. Most of us don't use HyperKitty and not many will be bothered checking the archives for the previous message. WHY does HK not

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-14 Thread sixpack13
Thanks. played yesterday with restic: it seems quick. tests on i7-6700, 16GB, SSD (target backup medium will be an HDD) read about borgbackup, indeed they seem very similar. (some) differences: other programming language and - IIRC- bb. can do backup's without encryption. all I need is

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-14 Thread sixpack13
thanks, knew it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-13 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 13.11.19 um 07:58 schrieb sixpack13: > currently I'm doing backup's with rsync. > Today "restic" got my attention and I'm thinking to move to it, cause of it's > ability to verify the backup (somehow). > > https://github.com/restic/restic/ > > Is someone here who is using it and can share

Re: Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 06:58 +, sixpack13 wrote: > hallo > currently I'm doing backup's with rsync. > Today "restic" got my attention and I'm thinking to move to it, cause of it's > ability to verify the backup (somehow). > > https://github.com/restic/restic/ > > Is someone here who is

Someone here using restic (Backup)

2019-11-12 Thread sixpack13
hallo currently I'm doing backup's with rsync. Today "restic" got my attention and I'm thinking to move to it, cause of it's ability to verify the backup (somehow). https://github.com/restic/restic/ Is someone here who is using it and can share some experiences ?